12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology

      Submit here before May 31, 2024

      About Digestion: 3.2 Impact Factor I 6.4 CiteScore I 0.914 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Impact of Baseline Characteristics on the Overall Survival of HCC Patients Treated with Sorafenib: Ten Years of Experience

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Sorafenib has been established as the standard of care for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since 2007 on the basis of two landmark trials (SHARP and Asia-Pacific). Ten years have passed since then and, despite much research in the field, still no validated real-life prognostic markers are available for HCC patients treated with this drug. Therefore, going through 10 years of research into sorafenib of several Italian Cancer Centers, we conducted a field-practice study aimed at identifying baseline clinical factors that could be significantly associated with overall survival (OS). Method: Univariate/multivariate analyses were conducted to retrospectively identify the impact of baseline characteristics on the OS of 398 advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib. Results: Based on univariate analysis, α-fetoprotein (AFP), albumin, AST, bilirubin, Child-Pugh, ECOG, systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, and portal vein thrombosis were significantly associated with shorter OS. Following adjustment for clinical covariates positive in univariate analysis, the multivariate analysis including AFP, age, etiology, albumin, aspartate transaminase (AST), bilirubin, Child-Pugh, LDH, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, ECOG, ALBI grade, portal vein thrombosis, SII, and BCLC stage identified increase in LDH, age >70 years, no viral etiologies, ECOG >0, albumin <35, ALBI grade 2, and AST >40 as prognostic factors for poorer OS based on the 5% significance level. Conclusion: Our study highlights that baseline hepatic function, patient-centered variables, and etiology have prognostic value. These findings might have implications in terms of therapeutic decision-making and patient counseling.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Observational registry of sorafenib use in clinical practice across Child-Pugh subgroups: The GIDEON study.

          GIDEON (Global Investigation of therapeutic DEcisions in hepatocellular carcinoma and Of its treatment with sorafeNib) is a prospective, observational registry study evaluating the safety of sorafenib and treatment practices in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. This large global database allowed for assessment of the use and tolerability of sorafenib in patients with liver dysfunction.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            In Hepatocellular Carcinoma miR-221 Modulates Sorafenib Resistance through Inhibition of Caspase-3–Mediated Apoptosis

            Purpose: The aberrant expression of miR-221 is a hallmark of human cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and its involvement in drug resistance, together with a proved in vivo efficacy of anti-miR-221 molecules, strengthen its role as an attractive target candidate in the oncologic field. The discovery of biomarkers predicting the response to treatments represents a clinical challenge in the personalized treatment era. This study aimed to investigate the possible role of miR-221 as a circulating biomarker in HCC patients undergoing sorafenib treatment as well as to evaluate its contribution to sorafenib resistance in advanced HCC.Experimental Design: A chemically induced HCC rat model and a xenograft mouse model, together with HCC-derived cell lines were employed to analyze miR-221 modulation by Sorafenib treatment. Data from the functional analysis were validated in tissue samples from surgically resected HCCs. The variation of circulating miR-221 levels in relation to Sorafenib treatment were assayed in the animal models and in two independent cohorts of patients with advanced HCC.Results: MiR-221 over-expression was associated with Sorafenib resistance in two HCC animal models and caspase-3 was identified as its target gene, driving miR-221 anti-apoptotic activity following Sorafenib administration. Lower pre-treatment miR-221 serum levels were found in patients subsequently experiencing response to Sorafenib and an increase of circulating miR-221 at the two months assessment was observed in responder patients.Conclusions: MiR-221 might represent a candidate biomarker of likelihood of response to Sorafenib in HCC patients to be tested in future studies. Caspase-3 modulation by miR-221 participates to Sorafenib resistance. Clin Cancer Res; 23(14); 3953-65. ©2017 AACR.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Ten years of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: Are there any predictive and/or prognostic markers?

              Sorafenib has been considered the standard of care for patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since 2007 and numerous studies have investigated the role of markers involved in the angiogenesis process at both the expression and genetic level and clinical aspect. What results have ten years of research produced? Several clinical and biological markers are associated with prognosis. The most interesting clinical parameters are adverse events, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, and macroscopic vascular invasion, while several single nucleotide polymorphisms and plasma angiopoietin-2 levels represent the most promising biological biomarkers. A recent pooled analysis of two phase III randomized trials showed that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, etiology and extra-hepatic spread are predictive factors of response to sorafenib, but did not identify any predictive biological markers. After 10 years of research into sorafenib there are still no validated prognostic or predictive factors of response to the drug in HCC. The aim of the present review was to summarize 10 years of research into sorafenib, looking in particular at the potential of associated clinical and biological markers to predict its efficacy in patients with advanced HCC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                GAT
                GAT
                10.1159/issn.2296-3774
                Gastrointestinal Tumors
                S. Karger AG
                2296-3774
                2296-3766
                2019
                October 2019
                12 September 2019
                : 6
                : 3-4
                : 92-107
                Affiliations
                [_a] aDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
                [_b] bDepartment of Medical Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
                [_c] cBiosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
                [_d] dOncology Unit, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
                [_e] eDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faenza Hospital, Faenza, Italy
                [_f] fIRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
                [_g] gMedical Oncology Unit, Hospital of Vicenza, Vicenza, Italy
                [_h] hDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
                [_i] iGeneral Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
                [_j] jDepartment of Oncology, Ospedale Cardinale G. Panico, Tricase, Italy
                [_k] kDivision of Internal and Metabolic Medicine, Baggiovara Hospital, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
                [_l] lUnit of Biology and Genetics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
                [_m] mDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
                [_n] nDepartment of Medical Oncology, Università Vita-Salute, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Milan, Italy
                Author notes
                *A. Casadei-Gardini, Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Modena, Via Del Pozzo 72, IT–41121 Modena (Italy), E-Mail casadeigardini@gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6289-7202
                Article
                502714 PMC6873043 Gastrointest Tumors 2019;6:92–107
                10.1159/000502714
                PMC6873043
                31768353
                493df8dd-8cc5-404f-8998-5a1827400bea
                © 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 05 July 2019
                : 29 July 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, Pages: 16
                Categories
                Research Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy,Gastroenterology & Hepatology,Surgery,Nutrition & Dietetics,Internal medicine
                Real-life conditions,Baseline factors,ALBI grade,Etiologies,Child-Pugh,ECOG,Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio,Lactate dehydrogenase,Prognostic factor,Transaminases

                Comments

                Comment on this article