439
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    25
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Does Recalling Moral Behavior Change the Perception of Brightness? : A Replication and Meta-Analysis of Banerjee, Chatterjee, and Sinha (2012)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Banerjee, Chatterjee, and Sinha (2012) recently reported that recalling unethical behavior led participants to see the room as darker and to desire more light-emitting products (e.g., a flashlight) compared to recalling ethical behavior. We replicated the methods of these two original studies with four high-powered replication studies (two online and two in the laboratory). Our results did not differ significantly from zero, 9 out of 10 of the effects were significantly smaller than the originally reported effects, and the effects were not consistently moderated by individual difference measures of potential discrepancies between the original and the replication samples. A meta-analysis that includes both the original and replication effects of moral recall on perceptions of brightness find a small, marginally significant effect ( d = 0.14 CL 95 −0.002 to 0.28). A meta-analysis that includes both the original and replication effects of moral recall on preferences for light-emitting products finds a small effect that did not differ from zero ( d = 0.13 CL 95 −0.04 to 0.29).

          Related collections

          Most cited references 18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Social evaluation by preverbal infants.

          The capacity to evaluate other people is essential for navigating the social world. Humans must be able to assess the actions and intentions of the people around them, and make accurate decisions about who is friend and who is foe, who is an appropriate social partner and who is not. Indeed, all social animals benefit from the capacity to identify individual conspecifics that may help them, and to distinguish these individuals from others that may harm them. Human adults evaluate people rapidly and automatically on the basis of both behaviour and physical features, but the ontogenetic origins and development of this capacity are not well understood. Here we show that 6- and 10-month-old infants take into account an individual's actions towards others in evaluating that individual as appealing or aversive: infants prefer an individual who helps another to one who hinders another, prefer a helping individual to a neutral individual, and prefer a neutral individual to a hindering individual. These findings constitute evidence that preverbal infants assess individuals on the basis of their behaviour towards others. This capacity may serve as the foundation for moral thought and action, and its early developmental emergence supports the view that social evaluation is a biological adaptation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Matrix product ansatz for Fermi fields in one dimension

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The dark side of self- and social perception: Black uniforms and aggression in professional sports.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                zsp
                Social Psychology
                Hogrefe Publishing
                1864-9335
                2151-2590
                May 2014
                2014
                : 45
                : 3
                : 246-252
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Tilburg University, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Mark J. Brandt, Department of Social Psychology, Room P06, P.O. Box 90153, Tilburg University, 5000 Tilburg, The Netherlands, m.j.brandt@ 123456tilburguniversity.edu
                Article
                zsp_45_3_246
                10.1027/1864-9335/a000191
                Product
                Self URI (journal-page): https://econtent.hogrefe.com/loi/zsp
                Categories
                Replication

                Comments

                Comment on this article