43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prevalence and characteristics of chronic musculoskeletal pain in Japan

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This cross-sectional study was conducted to obtain epidemiologic data on chronic musculoskeletal pain in the Japanese people, and with it a better understanding of the actual conditions and problems involved.

          Methods

          A questionnaire covering basic information, chronic musculoskeletal pain, daily life, quality of life, and social loss was prepared and mailed to 11507 individuals aged 18 years or older. Subjects were selected randomly nationwide in accordance with the demographic composition of Japan.

          Results

          The prevalence of chronic musculoskeletal pain was 15.4%. The prevalence was highest in people in their 30s to 50s. Pain occurred most frequently in the low back, neck, shoulder, and knee. Among symptomatic subjects, 42% sought treatment, by visiting a medical institution (19%), taking folk remedies (20%), or both (3%). Treatment was generally prolonged, with 70% of those treated reporting treatment durations of more than a year. Although 69% reported that their symptoms had improved, 30% reported unchanged or aggravated symptoms and dissatisfaction with treatment. Among symptomatic subjects, a high percentage of both men and women had lost jobs, left school, been absent from work or school, or had changed jobs. Basic activities of daily living (ADL) were disturbed in men, and the instrumental ADL (IADL) score was low in women. SF-36 scale scores were significantly lower in every area for subjects with chronic pain.

          Conclusions

          Chronic musculoskeletal pain does not necessarily improve even with prolonged treatment. It adversely affects daily life and both physical and mental health. Because those suffering pain often increasingly need assistance in daily activities, people around them are also affected. The therapeutic system and treatment procedures for chronic musculoskeletal pain merit prompt review.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Epidemiology of chronic non-malignant pain in Denmark.

          A series of health surveys are conducted every sixth to seventh year in Denmark. In the most recent survey of 2000, a national random sample (>16 years) was drawn from the Danish Central Personal Register. Out of the original sample 12,333 (74%) were interviewed and of these 10,066 returned a completed questionnaire (SF-36). The present study includes only those who both took part in the interview and the postal questionnaire. Cancer patients were excluded. Persons suffering from chronic pain (PG) were identified through the question 'Do you have chronic/long lasting pain lasting 6 months or more'? An overall chronic pain prevalence of 19% was found -16% for men and 21% for women. Prevalence of chronic pain increased with increasing age. Persons >/=67 years had 3.9 higher odds of suffering from chronic pain than persons in the age group 16-24 years. Compared with married persons, divorced or separated persons had 1.5 higher odds of chronic pain. Odds for chronic pain were 1.9 higher among those with an education of less than 10 years compared with individuals with an education of 13 years or more. During a 14-day period reporters of chronic pain had an average of 0.8 days (range 0-10) lost due to illness compared with an average of 0.4 days (range 0-10) for the control group (CG) (Odds Ratio (OR)) 2.0). Persons with a job which required high physical strain were more likely to report chronic pain compared with those with a sedentary job (OR 2.2). The odds of quitting one's job because of ill health were seven times higher among people belonging to the PG. A strong association between chronic pain and poor self-rated health was also demonstrated. The PG had twice as many contacts with various health professionals compared with the CG, and the health care system was, on average, utilised 25% more (overall contacts) by the PG than by the general population. Among the persons in the PG, 33% were not satisfied with the examinations carried out in connection with their pain condition and 40% were not satisfied with the treatment offered. Nearly 130,000 adults, corresponding to 3% of the Danish population, use opioids on a regular basis. Opioids are used by 12% of the PG.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain in the general Norwegian population.

            Population-based studies suggest that prevalence of chronic pain is increasing. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of chronic pain in a sample drawn from the general Norwegian population. In addition, the characteristics of chronic pain, as well as differences in demographic characteristics and health-related variables between persons with and without chronic pain were evaluated. A total of 4000 Norwegian citizens, were randomly drawn from the National Register, by Statistics Norway and were mailed a questionnaire. The response rate was 48.5%. The majority of the sample was female (51%), married (59%), and working for pay (69%) with a mean age of 45.2 years. The prevalence of chronic pain in the total sample was 24.4%, and 65% of the participants with chronic pain indicated that they had experienced chronic pain for over 5 years. The cause of the pain was not specified by 57% of the participants in chronic pain, and 31% reported no pain treatments. Women, older individuals, persons with less education, and those who were pensioned, reported chronic pain more frequently. The results of a logistic regression analysis indicate that the variables that provide unique contributions to predicting pain group memberships were: gender, education, being frequently ill, or having a chronic illness. These findings suggest that chronic pain is a significant problem in the general Norwegian population, and that gender, education, being frequently ill, or having a chronic illness are important variables in predicting pain group membership.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pain prevalence in Singapore.

              The prevalence of chronic pain is well described in various parts of the world; primarily in Western societies such as Europe, America and Australia. Little is known of the prevalence of chronic pain within Asia or Southeast Asia. In view of the cultural and genetic variation in pain causation, manifestation and reporting, the findings of previous studies cannot be translated to Asian countries. Prevalence studies needed to be carried out to quantify the magnitude and impact of chronic pain within Asian countries to properly allocate precious health funds to deal with this important healthcare issue. We report the findings of the prevalence study within one Asian country: Singapore. To determine the prevalence and impact of chronic pain in adult Singaporeans. Two sets of questionnaires were designed. The first, a screening questionnaire, to identify the prevalence of chronic pain, and should there be chronic pain; the second, a detailed questionnaire was administered, to characterise the features and the impact of pain. A cross-sectional sampling of Singapore adults were achieved using a computer-based multi-step random sampling of listed telephones numbers. The questionnaires were administered via telephone by a trained interviewer with the aid of a computer-assisted telephone interview system. A total of 4141 screening and 400 detailed questionnaires were completed. The prevalence of chronic pain, defined as pain of at least 3 months' duration over the last 6 months was 8.7% (n = 359). There was a higher prevalence in females (10.9%) and with increasing age. In particular, pain prevalence increased steeply beyond the age of 65 years old. There was a significant impact on work and daily function of those with chronic pain. Though the prevalence of chronic pain was marginally lower compared other studies, the impact of pain was just as significant. In a rapidly ageing population such as Singapore, chronic pain is an important emerging healthcare problem which will likely exert increasing toll on the existing social infrastructure within the next 5 to 10 years.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +81-3-53633812 , +81-3-33536597 , masa@sc.itc.keio.ac.jp
                Journal
                J Orthop Sci
                Journal of Orthopaedic Science
                Springer Japan (Japan )
                0949-2658
                1436-2023
                16 June 2011
                16 June 2011
                July 2011
                : 16
                : 4
                : 424-432
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 160-8582 Japan
                [2 ]Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
                [3 ]Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
                Article
                102
                10.1007/s00776-011-0102-y
                3140943
                21678085
                49875411-0e4e-44f0-be3b-4cb6b0854cd1
                © The Author(s) 2011
                History
                : 11 February 2011
                : 27 April 2011
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2011

                Orthopedics
                Orthopedics

                Comments

                Comment on this article