3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Approaches for Establishing Clinically Relevant Dissolution Specifications for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This manuscript represents the perspective of the Dissolution Analytical Working Group of the IQ Consortium. The intent of this manuscript is to highlight the challenges of, and to provide a recommendation on, the development of clinically relevant dissolution specifications (CRS) for immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms. A roadmap toward the development of CRS for IR products containing active ingredients with a non-narrow therapeutic window is discussed, within the context of mechanistic dissolution understanding, supported by in-human pharmacokinetic (PK) data. Two case studies present potential outcomes of following the CRS roadmap and setting dissolution specifications. These cases reveal some benefits and challenges of pursuing CRS with additional PK data, in light of current regulatory positions, including that of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), who generally favor this approach, but with the understanding that both industry and regulatory agency perspectives are still evolving in this relatively new field. The CRS roadmap discussed in this manuscript also describes a way to develop clinically relevant dissolution specifications based primarily on dissolution data for batches used in pivotal clinical studies, acknowledging that not all IR product development efforts need to be supported by additional PK studies, albeit with the associated risk of potentially unnecessarily tight manufacturing controls. Recommendations are provided on what stages during the life cycle investment into in vivo studies may be valuable. Finally, the opportunities for CRS within the context of post-approval changes, Modeling and Simulation (M&S), and the application of biowaivers, are briefly discussed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          AAPS J
          The AAPS journal
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1550-7416
          1550-7416
          November 2017
          : 19
          : 6
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Pharmaceutical Sciences and Clinical Supply, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, Pennsylvania, 19486, USA.
          [2 ] Pharmaceutical Sciences and Clinical Supply, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, Pennsylvania, 19486, USA. andreas_abend@merck.com.
          [3 ] Pharmaceutical Technology and Development, AstraZeneca R&D, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK.
          [4 ] Worldwide Research and Development, Global Chemistry and Manufacturing Controls, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut, 06340, USA.
          [5 ] Drug Product Science and Technology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903, USA.
          [6 ] Global Pharmaceutical Research and Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, 60064, USA.
          [7 ] Analytical Development, Biogen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02142, USA.
          [8 ] Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, California, 94080, USA.
          [9 ] Small Molecule Design & Development, Eli Lilly & Co., Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46285, USA.
          [10 ] Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., One Takeda Parkway, Deerfield, Illinois, 60015, USA.
          Article
          10.1208/s12248-017-0117-1
          10.1208/s12248-017-0117-1
          28831727
          49974570-201e-4d8d-9047-712b387b5963
          History

          SUPAC,clinically relevant dissolution specifications,biowaivers,PBPK modeling,BCS

          Comments

          Comment on this article