24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Modern cryptic species and crocodylian diversity in the fossil record

      1 , 2
      Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Advances in molecular biology and genetics are revealing that many recognized crocodylian species are complexes of two or more cryptic species. These discoveries will have a profound impact on interpretation of the crocodyliform fossil record. Our understanding of ranges of intraspecific variation in modern crocodylian morphology may be based on multiple species and thus express both intraspecific and interspecific variation. This raises questions about our ability to recognize modern species in the fossil record, and it also indicates that specimens from disparate localities or horizons may represent not single widespread species, but multiple related species. Ranges of variation in modern species require a thorough re-evaluation, and we may have to revisit previous perceptions of past crocodyliform diversity, rates of evolution or anagenetic lineages in stratigraphic succession. These challenges will not be unique to those studying crocodyliforms and will require sophisticated approaches to variation among modern and fossil specimens.

          Related collections

          Most cited references94

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Maps of Pleistocene sea levels in Southeast Asia: shorelines, river systems and time durations

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Evolutionary Species Concept Reconsidered

            E. Wiley (1978)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ancient gene flow from early modern humans into Eastern Neanderthals.

              It has been shown that Neanderthals contributed genetically to modern humans outside Africa 47,000-65,000 years ago. Here we analyse the genomes of a Neanderthal and a Denisovan from the Altai Mountains in Siberia together with the sequences of chromosome 21 of two Neanderthals from Spain and Croatia. We find that a population that diverged early from other modern humans in Africa contributed genetically to the ancestors of Neanderthals from the Altai Mountains roughly 100,000 years ago. By contrast, we do not detect such a genetic contribution in the Denisovan or the two European Neanderthals. We conclude that in addition to later interbreeding events, the ancestors of Neanderthals from the Altai Mountains and early modern humans met and interbred, possibly in the Near East, many thousands of years earlier than previously thought.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0024-4082
                1096-3642
                June 2020
                June 11 2020
                May 13 2020
                June 2020
                June 11 2020
                May 13 2020
                : 189
                : 2
                : 700-711
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
                [2 ]Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
                Article
                10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa039
                49a22dd4-c6d6-4658-b3b3-058385291a6e
                © 2020

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article