3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prevention, susceptibility, and clinical features of coronavirus disease 2019 in postoperative patients

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To the editor, The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread worldwide and is now a global pandemic. Surgeries were curtailed in many hospitals during the pandemic, and the recommendation to delay all elective surgeries was issued in account of the increased mortality rate in peri-operative patients with COVID-19. 1 , 2 Before Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, in Wuhan, China was designated to treat patients with COVID-19 and canceled all elective surgeries, few procedural measures were adopted to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection form December 15, 2019, to February 15, 2020 in our center. We reviewed 37,783 inpatients with accessible medical documents. The incidence of COVID-19 was 0.028% (7/25,135 patients) among non-surgical patients and 0.158% (20/12,648 patients) among postoperative patients, with a relative risk of 5.685 (P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 2.403–13.449) when compared to the non-surgical inpatient counterparts. Anatomically, patients who underwent thoracic operation showed the highest incidence of the infection, with 9 out of 575 patients (1.56%) diagnosed with COVID-19 during the post-surgical periods. And we found a significant increase in neutrophils (P < 0.001), decreased lymphocytes (P < 0.001), and dramatically greater neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P = 0.001) in the day one after surgery, which demonstrated an immunological change indicating a higher incidence of infection and poor outcomes for COVID-19 patients. And in our analysis, 40% (8/20) of post-surgical patients with COVID-19 developed severe pneumonia, in particular, 66.7% (6/9) of patients who had thoracic surgery progressed to severe pneumonia after COVID-19 diagnosis and three finally died from COVID-19. The laboratory results showed statistical differences in lymphocyte count, prothrombin time, D-dimer, and interleukin-2R between patients with severe pneumonia and mild pneumonia (Table 1 ). Table 1 Clinical characteristics of postoperative patients with COVID-19. Table 1 No. (%) P-valueb Total patients (n = 20)a Severe patients (n = 8) Mild patients (n = 12)a Symptom Fever 0.315 >39 °C 9 (52.9) 6 (75.0) 3 (33.3) ≤39 °C 7 (41.2) 2 (25.0) 5 (55.5) Cough 9 (52.9) 6 (75.0) 3 (33.3) 0.153 Chest distress 5 (29.4) 4 (50.0) 1 (11.1) 0.131 Dyspnea 5 (29.4) 5 (62.5) 0 0.009 Chest pain 2 (11.8) 1 (12.5) 1 (11.1) 1.000 Weak 5 (29.4) 5 (62.5) 0 0.009 Muscular soreness 4 (23.5) 4 (50.0) 0 0.029 Diarrhoea 2 (11.8) 1 (12.5) 1 (11.1) 1.000 Blood routine Neutrophils (×109/L) 6.48 ± 4.21 6.58 ± 5.09 6.39 ± 3.59 0.929 Lymphocytes (×109/L) 0.92 ± 0.34 0.72 ± 0.21 1.09 ± 0.35 0.021 Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio 8.33 ± 7.90 10.32 ± 10.64 6.55 ± 4.25 0.342 Coagulation function Activated partial thromboplastin time (s) 42.16 ± 7.63 43.51 ± 7.33 40.81 ± 8.19 0.498 Prothrombin time (s) 13.68 ± 1.45 14.45 ± 1.25 12.90 ± 1.25 0.012 D-dimer (μg/L) 4.20 ± 3.93 6.40 ± 4.50 2.00 ± 1.37 0.019 Blood biochemistry Albumin (g/L) 34.89 ± 4.74 36.04 ± 4.34 33.59 ± 5.16 0.335 Alanine aminotransferase (U/L) 34.40 ± 31.86 44.25 ± 40.05 23.14 ± 14.84 0.199 Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L) 39.53 ± 46.34 53.50 ± 60.65 23.57 ± 12.71 0.093 Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) 229.60 ± 135.44 262.63 ± 170.95 191.86 ± 74.75 0.083 Inflammation profile Procalcitonin (ng/mL) 0.09 ± 0.10 0.13 ± 0.12 0.07 ± 0.06 0.066 Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h) 45.27 ± 27.27 49.25 ± 30.50 40.71 ± 24.59 0.565 Serum ferritin (ug/L) 603.89 ± 610.10 875.78 ± 724.27 332.00 ± 341.92 0.140 C-reactive protein (mg/L) 63.74 ± 63.76 98.43 ± 75.55 36.76 ± 38.32 0.082 Cytokines Interleukin-1β (pg/mL) 0.462 Increased 2 (15.4) 2 (28.6) 0 Within normal range 11 (84.6) 5 (71.4) 6 (100.0) Interleukin-2R (U/mL) 781.46 ± 469.84 984.29 ± 557.02 544.83 ± 180.78 0.046 Increased 8 (61.5) 6 (85.7) 2 (33.3) Within normal range 5 (38.5) 1 (14.3) 4 (66.7) Interleukin-6 (pg/mL) 31.13 ± 34.78 46.92 ± 41.41 12.70 ± 9.38 0.073 Increased 10 (76.9) 6 (85.7) 4 (66.7) Within normal range 3 (23.1) 1 (14.3) 2 (33.3) Interleukin-8 (pg/mL) 17.85 ± 10.32 21.49 ± 12.11 12.76 ± 4.20 0.157 Increased 0 0 0 Within normal range 13 (100.0) 7 (100.0) 6 (100.0) Interleukin-10 (pg/mL) 0.070 Increased 4 (30.8) 4 (57.1) 0 Within normal range 9 (69.2) 3 (42.9) 6 (100.0) Tumor necrosis factor-α (pg/mL) 7.50 ± 2.22 7.91 ± 2.59 7.02 ± 1.80 0.491 Increased 5 (38.5) 3 (42.9) 2 (33.3) Within normal range 8 (61.5) 4 (57.1) 4 (66.7) Chest image Scope 0.073 Bilateral 10 (58.8) 7 (87.5) 3 (33.3) Unilateral 6 (35.3) 1 (12.5) 5 (55.5) Without signs 1 (5.88) 0 1 (11.1) Ground glass opacity 16 (94.1) 8 (100.0) 8 (88.8) 1.000 Consolidation 10 (58.8) 8 (100.0) 2 (22.2) 0.002 Pleural effusion 6 (35.3) 4 (50.0) 2 (22.2) 0.335 Clinical course, day From surgery to symptom 11.5 ± 11.8 9.1 ± 8.2 13.0 ± 13.8 0.670 From symptom to severe type 6.8 ± 4.9 Complication Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome 2 (10.0) 2 (25.0) 0 0.147 Abnormal liver function 7 (35.0) 5 (62.5) 2 (16.7) 0.062 Septic 1 (5.0) 1 (12.5) 0 0.400 Others 0 0 0 Co-infection Other virus 5 (29.4) 0 5 (55.5) 0.026 Bacteria 2 (11.8) 1 (12.5) 1 (11.1) 1.000 Fungus 0 0 0 Others 2 (11.8) 1 (12.5) 1 (11.1) 1.000 Treatment Oxygen uptake 14 (70.0) 8 (100.0) 6 (50.0) 0.042 Mechanical ventilation 2 (10.0) 2 (25.0) 0 0.400 Antibiotic therapy 18 (90.0) 8 (100.0) 10 (83.3) 0.495 Antiviral therapy 18 (90.0) 8 (100.0) 10 (83.3) 0.495 Glucocorticoid 6 (30.0) 5 (62.5) 1 (8.3) 0.018 Outcome Destination 0.049 Recovery 17 (85.0) 5 (62.5) 12 (100.0) Died 3 (15.0) 3 (37.5) 0 Measurement data was presented as mean ± standard deviation. a Three mild patients were followed up in out-patient department and symptoms, lab tests and chest images of COVID-19 among these three patients were missing. b P values indicate differences between severe patients and mild patients. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. With the fallen curve in a district, it was not appropriate to postpone the elective surgeries indefinitely. Our center resumed elective surgeries from April 1st, 2020. Several managements strategies were adopted to protect surgical patients because of the susceptibility and vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2 infection (Fig. 1 ). These are as follows: 1. Ward transformation: The two zones and passages were arranged in general wards: two-zones include the clean area and the semi-contaminated area; two-passages include the passage for medical staff and the passage for patients. The semi-contaminated area acts as a transition to hold new inpatients and monitor the respiratory symptoms while under medical treatment and care for a period of observation (3–7 days). 2. Pre-admission screening: Radiological and microbiological tests were conducted among patients and their companions before administrated in the semi-contaminated area of the general ward. 3. Enclosed managements: Adopting enclosed managements further eliminated the infection and transmission in the hospital. 4. Post-operative monitoring: Monitor the symptoms and laboratory results after receiving surgery according to our previous experience, especially the decreasing lymphocyte count, prolonged prothrombin time, and higher D-dimer. Fig. 1 Prevention managements and the data comparison. The incidence of COVID-19 in surgical patients before and after taking prevention managements. Fig. 1 In conclusion, this study presents the clinical characteristics and severity of COVID-19 of perioperative case series. The learning experiences from managing these patients, some strategies adopted. And we provided practices to prevent COVID-19 among perioperative patients in hospital after resuming surgery. Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study

          Summary Background The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on postoperative recovery needs to be understood to inform clinical decision making during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports 30-day mortality and pulmonary complication rates in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods This international, multicentre, cohort study at 235 hospitals in 24 countries included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The main secondary outcome measure was pulmonary complications, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation. Findings This analysis includes 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020, of whom 835 (74·0%) had emergency surgery and 280 (24·8%) had elective surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (26·1%) patients. 30-day mortality was 23·8% (268 of 1128). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (51·2%) of 1128 patients; 30-day mortality in these patients was 38·0% (219 of 577), accounting for 82·6% (219 of 265) of all deaths. In adjusted analyses, 30-day mortality was associated with male sex (odds ratio 1·75 [95% CI 1·28–2·40], p<0·0001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (2·30 [1·65–3·22], p<0·0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3–5 versus grades 1–2 (2·35 [1·57–3·53], p<0·0001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (1·55 [1·01–2·39], p=0·046), emergency versus elective surgery (1·67 [1·06–2·63], p=0·026), and major versus minor surgery (1·52 [1·01–2·31], p=0·047). Interpretation Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. Thresholds for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice, particularly in men aged 70 years and older. Consideration should be given for postponing non-urgent procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. Funding National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Snapshot of Elective Oncological Surgery in Italy During COVID-19 Emergency

            Objective: To analyze the impact of COVID-19 emergency on elective oncological surgical activity in Italy. Summary of Background Data: COVID-19 emergency shocked national health systems, subtracting resources from treatment of other diseases. Its impact on surgical oncology is still to elucidate. Methods: A 56-question survey regarding the oncological surgical activity in Italy during the COVID-19 emergency was sent to referral centers for hepato-bilio-pancreatic, colorectal, esophago-gastric, and sarcoma/soft-tissue tumors. The survey portrays the situation 5 weeks after the first case of secondary transmission in Italy. Results: In total, 54 surgical Units in 36 Hospitals completed the survey (95%). After COVID-19 emergency, 70% of Units had reduction of hospital beds (median −50%) and 76% of surgical activity (median −50%). The number of surgical procedures decreased: 3.8 (interquartile range 2.7–5.4) per week before the emergency versus 2.6 (22–4.4) after (P = 0.036). In Lombardy, the most involved district, the number decreased from 3.9 to 2 procedures per week. The time interval between multidisciplinary discussion and surgery more than doubled: 7 (6–10) versus 3 (3–4) weeks (P < 0.001). Two-third (n = 34) of departments had repeated multidisciplinary discussion of patients. The commonest criteria to prioritize surgery were tumor biology (80%), time interval from neoadjuvant therapy (61%), risk of becoming unresectable (57%), and tumor-related symptoms (52%). Oncological hub-and-spoke program was planned in 29 departments, but was active only in 10 (19%). Conclusions: This survey showed how surgical oncology suffered remarkable reduction of the activity resulting in doubled waiting-list. The oncological hub-and-spoke program did not work adequately. The reassessment of healthcare systems to better protect the oncological path seems a priority.
              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Journal
              Asian J Surg
              Asian J Surg
              Asian Journal of Surgery
              Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.
              1015-9584
              0219-3108
              16 October 2020
              16 October 2020
              Affiliations
              [1]Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
              [2]Department of Medical Affairs, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
              [3]Department of General Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
              [4]Institute of Cancer, Xinqiao Hospital, The Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China
              [5]Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
              Author notes
              [∗∗ ]Corresponding author.
              []Corresponding author.
              Article
              S1015-9584(20)30297-9
              10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.09.017
              7566675
              49f3d33c-d73e-4d5d-a423-fe57df7807e7
              © 2020 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

              Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

              History
              : 23 September 2020
              : 29 September 2020
              Categories
              Article

              Comments

              Comment on this article