32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Why Do Some People Do “More” to Mitigate Climate Change than Others? Exploring Heterogeneity in Psycho-Social Associations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The urgency of climate change mitigation calls for a profound shift in personal behavior. This paper investigates psycho-social correlates of extra mitigation behavior in response to climate change, while also testing for potential (unobserved) heterogeneity in European citizens' decision-making. A person's extra mitigation behavior in response to climate change is conceptualized—and differentiated from common mitigation behavior—as some people's broader and greater levels of behavioral engagement (compared to others) across specific self-reported mitigation actions and behavioral domains. Regression analyses highlight the importance of environmental psychographics (i.e., attitudes, motivations, and knowledge about climate change) and socio-demographics (especially country-level variables) in understanding extra mitigation behavior. By looking at the data through the lens of segmentation, significant heterogeneity is uncovered in the associations of attitudes and knowledge about climate change—but not in motivational or socio-demographic links—with extra mitigation behavior in response to climate change, across two groups of environmentally active respondents. The study has implications for promoting more ambitious behavioral responses to climate change, both at the individual level and across countries.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Associations between major domains of personality and health behavior.

          Broad personality traits may be important predictors of health behavior patterns. Two studies are reported which examined the associations between five major personality dimensions and four major health behavior dimensions. Prior associations between health behaviors and neurotic and extraverted personality tendencies generally were replicated. However, Conscientiousness and Agreeableness, two domains of personality that have received little research attention, emerged as important personality predictors of health behaviors. The results indicate that personality is a reliable predictor of health behavior patterns. It is suggested that the importance of personality has been underestimated in past research by the failure to consider appropriate health behavior criteria and the omission of important personality dimensions, such as Conscientiousness and Agreeableness, when studying health behavior patterns.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception.

            A mail survey on ecological risk perception was administered in the summer of 2002 to a randomized sample of the lay public and to selected risk professionals at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). The ranking of 24 ecological risk items, from global climate change to commercial fishing, reveals that the lay public is more concerned about low-probability, high-consequence risks whereas the risk professionals are more concerned about risks that pose long-term, ecosystem-level impacts. To test the explanatory power of the value-belief-norm (VBN) theory for risk perception, respondents were questioned about their personal values, spiritual beliefs, and worldviews. The most consistent predictors of the risk rankings are belief in the new ecological paradigm (NEP) and Schwartz's altruism. The NEP and Schwartz's altruism explain from 19% to 46% of the variance in the risk rankings. Religious beliefs account for less than 6% of the variance and do not show a consistent pattern in predicting risk perception although religious fundamentalists are generally less concerned about the risk items. While not exerting as strong an impact, social-structural variables do have some influence on risk perception. Ethnicities show no effect on the risk scales but the more educated and financially well-off are less concerned about the risk items. Political leanings have no direct influence on risk rankings, but indirectly affect rankings through the NEP. These results reveal that the VBN theory is a plausible explanation for the differences measured in the respondents' perception of ecological risk.
              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Contributors
              Role: Editor
              Journal
              PLoS One
              PLoS ONE
              plos
              plosone
              PLoS ONE
              Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
              1932-6203
              2014
              5 September 2014
              : 9
              : 9
              : e106645
              Affiliations
              [1]Department of Economics and Business, University of Almería (ceiA3), Almería, Spain
              The University of Adelaide, Australia
              Author notes

              Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

              Conceived and designed the experiments: JMO NGF RAL. Performed the experiments: JMO NGF RAL. Analyzed the data: JMO NGF RAL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JMO NGF RAL. Wrote the paper: JMO NGF RAL.

              Article
              PONE-D-14-01392
              10.1371/journal.pone.0106645
              4156351
              25191841
              4a0a7729-f47c-48ef-8e11-43d2b3e493b0
              Copyright @ 2014

              This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

              History
              : 10 January 2014
              : 7 August 2014
              Page count
              Pages: 17
              Funding
              The authors acknowledge financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Science (National R&D Project ECO2011-24921 and predoctoral grant program) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF/FEDER), from the University of Almería's (UAL, ceiA3) predoctoral grant program, and CySOC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
              Categories
              Research Article
              Biology and Life Sciences
              Developmental Biology
              Morphogenesis
              Morphogenic Segmentation
              Ecology
              Behavioral Ecology
              Psychology
              Behavior
              Social Psychology
              Earth Sciences
              Atmospheric Science
              Climatology
              Climate Change
              Ecology and Environmental Sciences
              Environmental Protection
              Research and Analysis Methods
              Research Design
              Survey Research
              Social Sciences
              Sociology
              Social Research

              Uncategorized
              Uncategorized

              Comments

              Comment on this article