50
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      OlympiAD final overall survival and tolerability results: Olaparib versus chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In the OlympiAD study, olaparib was shown to improve progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients with a germline BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We now report the planned final overall survival (OS) results, and describe the most common adverse events (AEs) to better understand olaparib tolerability in this population.

          Patients and methods

          OlympiAD, a Phase III, randomized, controlled, open-label study (NCT02000622), enrolled patients with a germline BRCAm and HER2-negative mBC who had received ≤2 lines of chemotherapy for mBC. Patients were randomized to olaparib tablets (300 mg bid) or predeclared TPC (capecitabine, vinorelbine, or eribulin). OS and safety were secondary end points.

          Results

          A total of 205 patients were randomized to olaparib and 97 to TPC. At 64% data maturity, median OS was 19.3 months with olaparib versus 17.1 months with TPC (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.66–1.23; P = 0.513); median follow-up was 25.3 and 26.3 months, respectively. HR for OS with olaparib versus TPC in prespecified subgroups were: prior chemotherapy for mBC [no (first-line setting): 0.51, 95% CI 0.29–0.90; yes (second/third-line): 1.13, 0.79–1.64]; receptor status (triple negative: 0.93, 0.62–1.43; hormone receptor positive: 0.86, 0.55–1.36); prior platinum (yes: 0.83, 0.49–1.45; no: 0.91, 0.64–1.33). Adverse events during olaparib treatment were generally low grade and manageable by supportive treatment or dose modification. There was a low rate of treatment discontinuation (4.9%), and the risk of developing anemia did not increase with extended olaparib exposure.

          Conclusions

          While there was no statistically significant improvement in OS with olaparib compared to TPC, there was the possibility of meaningful OS benefit among patients who had not received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Olaparib was generally well-tolerated, with no evidence of cumulative toxicity during extended exposure.

          Please see the article online for additional video content.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Performance of prediction models for BRCA mutation carriage in three racial/ethnic groups: findings from the Northern California Breast Cancer Family Registry.

          Patients with early-onset breast and/or ovarian cancer frequently wish to know if they inherited a mutation in one of the cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 or BRCA2. Accurate carrier prediction models are needed to target costly testing. Two widely used models, BRCAPRO and BOADICEA, were developed using data from non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), but their accuracies have not been evaluated in other racial/ethnic populations. We evaluated the BRCAPRO and BOADICEA models in a population-based series of African American, Hispanic, and NHW breast cancer patients tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. We assessed model calibration by evaluating observed versus predicted mutations and attribute diagrams, and model discrimination using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves. Both models were well-calibrated within each racial/ethnic group, with some exceptions. BOADICEA overpredicted mutations in African Americans and older NHWs, and BRCAPRO underpredicted in Hispanics. In all racial/ethnic groups, the models overpredicted in cases whose personal and family histories indicated >80% probability of carriage. The two models showed similar discrimination in each racial/ethnic group, discriminating least well in Hispanics. For example, BRCAPRO's areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 83% (95% confidence interval, 63-93%) for NHWs, compared with 74% (59-85%) for African Americans and 58% (45-70%) for Hispanics. The poor performance of the model for Hispanics may be due to model misspecification in this racial/ethnic group. However, it may also reflect racial/ethnic differences in the distributions of personal and family histories among breast cancer cases in the Northern California population.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Can contemporary trials in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) detect overall survival (OS) benefit?

              Author and article information

              Journal
              Ann Oncol
              Ann. Oncol
              annonc
              Annals of Oncology
              Oxford University Press
              0923-7534
              1569-8041
              April 2019
              23 January 2019
              23 January 2019
              : 30
              : 4 , Evidence for an early, on-therapy biomarker of response in patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1
              : 558-566
              Affiliations
              [1 ]Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
              [2 ]Cancer Risk and Prevention Program, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, USA
              [3 ]Division of Oncology, University of Padova, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
              [4 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
              [5 ]Center of Breast Diseases, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
              [6 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
              [7 ]Department of Surgery, Osaka National Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Osaka, Japan
              [8 ]Breast Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
              [9 ]Department of Emergency, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
              [10 ]Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
              [11 ]Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, USA
              [12 ]Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK
              [13 ]Department of Medicine, Basser Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
              Author notes
              Correspondence to: Dr Mark Robson, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA. Tel: +646-888-4058; E-mail: robsonm@ 123456mskcc.org
              Present address: Medorci Ltd, Macclesfield, UK.
              Author information
              http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3109-1692
              http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5210-5344
              Article
              mdz012
              10.1093/annonc/mdz012
              6503629
              30689707
              4a489c45-b60a-4c62-8396-1408f2a6390d
              © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

              This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

              History
              Page count
              Pages: 9
              Funding
              Funded by: AstraZeneca 10.13039/100004325
              Funded by: AstraZeneca and Merck & Co.
              Funded by: Inc.
              Funded by: NIH/NCI Cancer Center
              Funded by: Breast Cancer Research Foundation 10.13039/100001006
              Funded by: Mudskipper Business Ltd
              Categories
              Original Articles
              Breast Tumors
              Editor's Choice

              Oncology & Radiotherapy
              breast cancer,germline brca mutation,overall survival,parp inhibitor,olaparib,tolerability

              Comments

              Comment on this article

              Related Documents Log