16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Modification in Laryngeal mask airway CTrach tube design

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sir, Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) C Trach is a supraglottic device, which is functionally identical to intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA),but in addition has an integrated fiberoptic bundle with liquid crystal display(LCD).[1] When compared to ILMA, C Trach enables ventilation and allows real time visualization of endotracheal (ET) intubation with endotracheal tube.[2 3] The LMA CTrach is inserted in neutral head position by using one handed rotational technique.[3] Following confirmation of the adequate lung ventilation, the LCD is connected to the C Trach and the laryngeal structures are visualized. After obtaining the best laryngeal view, the tracheal tube is passed through the barrel of the C Trach. The LMA C Trach ET intubation tube has a black horizontal line 10 cm proximal to the cuff and as this line starts disappearing from the barrel of the LMA C Trach the epiglottis elevating bar gets lifted and the tracheal intubation is facilitated under direct vision.[4] Following ET intubation tube, LMA C Trach is removed. The black horizontal mark on the LMA C Trach ET intubation tube indicates the position of the ET intubation tube in relation to the epiglottis elevating bar, but it does not help in ensuring the correct depth of ET intubation tube with in the trachea. All routinely used polyvinylchloride ET intubation tubes have a black mark 2.5-3cm proximal to the cuff, which gives a rough estimate of the length of ET intubation tube to be inserted within the trachea. This black mark when placed at the level of vocal cords during intubation ensures optimal placement of the tube tip in the mid tracheal position.[5] The intubation through ILMA is a blind procedure; therefore, ET intubation tube of ILMA does not have any black mark. On the other hand, the intubation via C Trach is carried out under direct vision, so the presence of a black mark 3 cm proximal to the cuff on the ET intubation tube, when placed at the level of vocal cords, can act as a guide for the correct depth placement of the tube within the trachea [Figure 1]. Figure 1 Arrow mark indicating the desired black mark on the posterior surface of laryngeal mask airway C Trach endotracheal intubation tube. As LMA C Trach removal following ET intubation is a blind procedure, advancement of the tracheal tube is usual at this time as one tends to exert slight downward pressure on the ET tube so that it does not slip out at the time of removal of C Trach. The correct initial placement facilitated by the black mark on the C Trach ET intubation tube would also prevent excessive advancement of ET intubation tube at the time of C Trach removal, especially, when used by inexperienced trainees. Thus, this suggested modification of the LMA C Trach ET intubation tube design could help in correct placement of the tube with reference to the black mark placed at the level of cords under vision.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The LMA CTrach, a new laryngeal mask airway for endotracheal intubation under vision: evaluation in 100 patients.

          The LMA CTrach is a new laryngeal mask system consisting of an LMA CTrach Airway with integrated fibreoptic channels, and a detachable LMA CTrach Viewer. This system enables viewing of the larynx and aids endotracheal intubation through a laryngeal mask airway. Method. We used and evaluated this system in 100 adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia for elective surgery. Our primary outcomes were the success rates of LMA CTrach Airway insertion and endotracheal intubation with this system. We were able to insert the LMA CTrach Airway in and to ventilate all 100 patients. We were successful in endotracheal intubation, either under vision or blind, in 96 patients. We were able to view the larynx in 84 patients, but the quality of the best view obtained was very variable. The median (inter quartile range) time for the complete intubation process was 166 (114-233) s. The system allowed nearly continuous ventilation and oxygenation during the process. The LMA CTrach system has potential advantages over the LMA Fastrach system, including the ability to align the LMA outlet with the larynx and a high first intubation attempt success rate. However, it was difficult to view the larynx with the LMA CTrach compared with direct laryngoscopy, and expectations must be moderated.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The intubating laryngeal mask. II: A preliminary clinical report of a new means of intubating the trachea.

            We have assessed the efficacy of a new laryngeal mask prototype, the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA), as a ventilatory device and blind intubation guide. The ILMA consists of an anatomically curved, short, wide bore, stainless steel tube sheathed in silicone which is bonded to a laryngeal mask and a guiding handle. It has a single moveable aperture bar, a guiding ramp and can accommodate an 8 mm tracheal tube (TT). After induction of anaesthesia with propofol 2.5 mg kg-1 and fentanyl 2.5 micrograms kg-1, the device was inserted successfully at the first attempt in all 150 (100%) patients and adequate ventilation achieved in all, with minor adjustments required in four patients. Placement did not require movement of the head and neck or insertion of the fingers in the patient's mouth. Blind tracheal intubation using a straight silicone cuffed TT was attempted after administration of atracurium 0.5 mg kg-1. If resistance was felt during intubation, a sequence of adjusting manoeuvres was used based on the depth at which resistance occurred. Tracheal intubation was possible in 149 of 150 (99.3%) patients. In 75 (50%) patients no resistance was encountered and the trachea was intubated at the first attempt, 28 (19%) patients required one adjusting manoeuvre and 46 (31%) patients required 2-4 adjusting manoeuvres before intubation was successful. There were 13 patients with potential or known airway problems. The lungs of all of these patients were ventilated easily and the trachea intubated using the ILMA. In 10 of 13 (77%) of these patients, no resistance was encountered and the trachea was intubated at the first attempt; three of 13 (23%) patients required one adjusting manoeuvre. Tracheal intubation required significantly fewer adjusting manoeuvres in patients with a predicted or known difficult airway (P < 0.05). We conclude that the ILMA appeared on initial assessment to be an effective ventilatory device and intubation guide for routine and difficult airway patients not at risk of gastric aspiration.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluation of the CTrach--an intubating LMA with integrated fibreoptic system.

              The laryngeal mask airway CTrach (CTrach) is a variant of the intubating laryngeal mask airway. It provides visualization of the larynx during intubation and is designed to increase the success rates of ventilation and tracheal intubation. Sixty healthy anaesthetized and paralysed patients with normal airways were studied. The success rates of ventilation and intubation using CTrach were determined. Laryngeal view scoring ranged from grade I (full view of arytenoids and glottis), II (arytenoids and glottis partly visible), III (view of arytenoids, glottis or epiglottis blurred, or view clear with only epiglottis visible) to IV (no part of larynx identifiable). Adjusting manoeuvres were undertaken to improve the laryngeal view in grades II or worse. CTrach insertion and ventilation was possible in all patients. Initial views were scored as grade I in 22 (36.7%), grade II in 14 (23.3%), grade III in 7 (11.7%) and grade IV in 17 (28.3%) patients. Adjusting manoeuvres were undertaken in 38 patients with grade II and worse (63.3%), resulting in improved views of grade I in 33 (55.0%), grade II in 18 (30.0%), grade III in 4 (6.7%) and grade IV in 5 (8.3%) patients. Tracheal intubation was successful in 58 (96.6%) patients at first attempt and in one at second. Tracheal intubation failed once. In 60 patients with normal airways, the CTrach was used successfully for ventilation, with successful tracheal intubation in 59 patients. Tracheal intubation can be successful despite grade III or IV views.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol
                J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol
                JOACP
                Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0970-9185
                2231-2730
                Apr-Jun 2014
                : 30
                : 2
                : 287
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, GTB Hospital and University College of Medical Sciences, Shahdara, New Delhi, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Geetanjali Chilkoti, GTB Hospital and University College of Medical Sciences, Shahdara, New Delhi - 110 095, India. E-mail: geetanjalidr@ 123456yahoo.in
                Article
                JOACP-30-287
                10.4103/0970-9185.130109
                4009660
                24803778
                4a4f44f2-ba2a-409a-a9a0-4c9cf009ca07
                Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Letters to Editor

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                Anesthesiology & Pain management

                Comments

                Comment on this article