17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using GPS collars to investigate the frequency and behavioural outcomes of intraspecific interactions among carnivores: A case study of male cheetahs in the Maasai Mara, Kenya

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Intraspecific interactions between individuals or groups of individuals of the same species are an important component of population dynamics. Interactions can be static, such as spatial overlap, or dynamic based on the interactions of movements, and can be mediated through communication, such as the deployment of scent marks. Interactions and their behavioural outcomes can be difficult to determine, especially for species that live at low densities. With the use of GPS collars we quantify both static and dynamic interactions between male cheetahs ( Acinonyx jubatus) and the behavioural outcomes. The 99% home-ranges of males overlapped significantly while there was little overlap of the 50% home-ranges. Despite this overlap, male cheetahs rarely came into close proximity of one another, possibly because presence was communicated through frequent visits to marking posts. The minimum distance between individuals in a dyad ranged from 89m to 196m but the average proximity between individuals ranged from 17,145 ± 6,865m to 26,367 ± 11,288m. Possible interactions took place more frequently at night than by day and occurred mostly in the 50% home-range of one individual of a dyad or where cores of both individuals overlapped. After a possible encounter male cheetahs stayed in close proximity to each other for up to 6 hours, which could be the result of a territory defence strategy or the presence of a receptive female. We believe that one of the encounters between a singleton and a 5-male coalition resulted in the death of the singleton. Our results give new insights into cheetah interactions, which could help our understanding of ecological processes such as disease transmission.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            SOCPROG programs: analysing animal social structures

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                3 April 2019
                2019
                : 14
                : 4
                : e0213910
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Kenya Wildlife Trust, Nairobi, Kenya
                [2 ] Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney, United Kingdom
                [3 ] Centre for Biodiversity and Environmental Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                University of Tasmania, AUSTRALIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4216-8819
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4108-6608
                Article
                PONE-D-18-27573
                10.1371/journal.pone.0213910
                6447186
                30943236
                4a61a4df-64eb-43dd-bfab-4522b76d3acd
                © 2019 Broekhuis et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 21 September 2018
                : 4 March 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 5, Pages: 16
                Funding
                Funded by: Banovich Wildscapes Foundation
                Funded by: African Wildlife Foundation
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100001901, Vidda Foundation;
                Funded by: BAND Foundation
                Funded by: Kenya Wildlife Trust
                Award Recipient :
                Funding was provided by the Banovich Wildscapes Foundation ( www.wildscapesfoundation.org), the African Wildlife Foundation ( www.awf.org), Vidda Foundation ( www.vidda.org), BAND Foundation ( www.bandfdn.org) and donations made through the Kenya Wildlife Trust ( www.kenyawildlifetrust.org). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Cats
                Cheetahs
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Species Interactions
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Animal Behavior
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Animal Behavior
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animal Behavior
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Animal Types
                Wildlife
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animal Types
                Wildlife
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Probability Theory
                Probability Distribution
                Normal Distribution
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Africa
                Kenya
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Population Biology
                Population Dynamics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Cats
                Custom metadata
                Data are available from Dryad (doi: 10.5061/dryad.7kk71d0).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article