16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Morphine and Clonidine Synergize to Ameliorate Low Back Pain in Mice

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a debilitating condition associated with signs of axial and radiating pain. In humans with chronic LBP, opioids are often prescribed with varying outcomes and a multitude of side effects. Combination therapies, in which multiple pharmacological agents synergize to ameliorate pain without similar potentiation of adverse reactions, may be useful in improving therapeutic outcome in these patients. The SPARC-null mouse model of low back pain due to disc degeneration was used to assess the effects of opioid (morphine) and α 2-adrenergic agonist (clonidine) coadministration on measures of axial and radiating pain. The results indicate that systemic morphine and clonidine, coadministered at a fixed dose of 100 : 1 (morphine : clonidine), show a synergistic interaction in reversing signs of axial LBP, in addition to improving the therapeutic window for radiating LBP. Furthermore, these improvements were observed in the absence of synergy in assays of motor function which are indicative of side effects such as sedation and motor incoordination. These data show that the addition of low-dose systemic clonidine improves therapeutic outcome in measures of both axial and radiating pain. Combination therapy could be of enormous benefit to patients suffering from chronic LBP.

          Related collections

          Most cited references74

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration.

            Cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study. To study the relation of low back pain (LBP) to disc degeneration in the lumbar spine. Controversy still prevails about the relationship between disc degeneration and LBP. Classification of disc degeneration and symptoms varies, hampering comparison of study results. Subjects comprised 164 men aged 40-45 years-53 machine drivers, 51 construction carpenters, and 60 office workers. The data of different types of LBP, individual characteristics, and lifestyle factors were obtained from a questionnaire and a structured interview. Degeneration of discs L2/L3-L5/S1 (dark nucleus pulposus and posterior and anterior bulge) was assessed with MRI. An increased risk of LBP (including all types) was found in relation to all signs of disc degeneration. An increased risk of sciatic pain was found in relation to posterior bulges, but local LBP was not related to disc degeneration. The risks of LBP and sciatic pain were strongly affected by occupation. Low back pain is associated with signs of disc degeneration and sciatic pain with posterior disc bulges. Low back pain is strongly associated with occupation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce.

              Common pain conditions appear to have an adverse effect on work, but no comprehensive estimates exist on the amount of productive time lost in the US workforce due to pain. To measure lost productive time (absence and reduced performance due to common pain conditions) during a 2-week period. Cross-sectional study using survey data from the American Productivity Audit (a telephone survey that uses the Work and Health Interview) of working adults between August 1, 2001, and July 30, 2002. Random sample of 28 902 working adults in the United States. Lost productive time due to common pain conditions (arthritis, back, headache, and other musculoskeletal) expressed in hours per worker per week and calculated in US dollars. Thirteen percent of the total workforce experienced a loss in productive time during a 2-week period due to a common pain condition. Headache was the most common (5.4%) pain condition resulting in lost productive time. It was followed by back pain (3.2%), arthritis pain (2.0%), and other musculoskeletal pain (2.0%). Workers who experienced lost productive time from a pain condition lost a mean (SE) of 4.6 (0.09) h/wk. Workers who had a headache had a mean (SE) loss in productive time of 3.5 (0.1) h/wk. Workers who reported arthritis or back pain had mean (SE) lost productive times of 5.2 (0.25) h/wk. Other common pain conditions resulted in a mean (SE) loss in productive time of 5.5 (0.22) h/wk. Lost productive time from common pain conditions among active workers costs an estimated 61.2 billion dollars per year. The majority (76.6%) of the lost productive time was explained by reduced performance while at work and not work absence. Pain is an inordinately common and disabling condition in the US workforce. Most of the pain-related lost productive time occurs while employees are at work and is in the form of reduced performance.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pain Res Treat
                Pain Res Treat
                PRT
                Pain Research and Treatment
                Hindawi Publishing Corporation
                2090-1542
                2090-1550
                2012
                23 April 2012
                : 2012
                : 150842
                Affiliations
                1Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 0G1
                2McGill Scoliosis & Spine Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 2B4
                3Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 3R8
                4Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 0G1
                5Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1Y6
                6Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1Y6
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: María Asunción Romero Molina

                Article
                10.1155/2012/150842
                3347752
                22577543
                4a72694e-b20b-42cf-b0a7-a73fca8f328d
                Copyright © 2012 Maral Tajerian et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 2 December 2011
                : 28 January 2012
                : 4 February 2012
                Categories
                Research Article

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                Anesthesiology & Pain management

                Comments

                Comment on this article