25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Novel Dried Blood Spot-LCMS Method for the Quantification of Methotrexate Polyglutamates as a Potential Marker for Methotrexate Use in Children

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Development and validation of a selective and sensitive LCMS method for the determination of methotrexate polyglutamates in dried blood spots (DBS).

          Methods

          DBS samples [spiked or patient samples] were prepared by applying blood to Guthrie cards which was then dried at room temperature. The method utilised 6-mm disks punched from the DBS samples (equivalent to approximately 12 µl of whole blood). The simple treatment procedure was based on protein precipitation using perchloric acid followed by solid phase extraction using MAX cartridges. The extracted sample was chromatographed using a reversed phase system involving an Atlantis T3-C18 column (3 µm, 2.1×150 mm) preceded by Atlantis guard column of matching chemistry. Analytes were subjected to LCMS analysis using positive electrospray ionization.

          Key Results

          The method was linear over the range 5–400 nmol/L. The limits of detection and quantification were 1.6 and 5 nmol/L for individual polyglutamates and 1.5 and 4.5 nmol/L for total polyglutamates, respectively. The method has been applied successfully to the determination of DBS finger-prick samples from 47 paediatric patients and results confirmed with concentrations measured in matched RBC samples using conventional HPLC-UV technique.

          Conclusions and Clinical Relevance

          The methodology has a potential for application in a range of clinical studies (e.g. pharmacokinetic evaluations or medication adherence assessment) since it is minimally invasive and easy to perform, potentially allowing parents to take blood samples at home. The feasibility of using DBS sampling can be of major value for future clinical trials or clinical care in paediatric rheumatology.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

          Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is a broad term that describes a clinically heterogeneous group of arthritides of unknown cause, which begin before 16 years of age. This term encompasses several disease categories, each of which has distinct methods of presentation, clinical signs, and symptoms, and, in some cases, genetic background. The cause of disease is still poorly understood but seems to be related to both genetic and environmental factors, which result in the heterogeneity of the illness. Although none of the available drugs has a curative potential, prognosis has greatly improved as a result of substantial progresses in disease management. The most important new development has been the introduction of drugs such as anticytokine agents, which constitute a valuable treatment option for patients who are resistant to conventional antirheumatic agents. Further insights into the disease pathogenesis and treatment will be provided by the continuous advances in understanding of the mechanisms connected to the immune response and inflammatory process, and by the development of new drugs that are able to inhibit selectively single molecules or pathways.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading.

            When comparing a new method of measurement with a standard method, one of the things we want to know is whether the difference between the measurements by the two methods is related to the magnitude of the measurement. A plot of the difference against the standard measurement is sometimes suggested, but this will always appear to show a relation between difference and magnitude when there is none. A plot of the difference against the average of the standard and new measurements is unlikely to mislead in this way. We show this theoretically and by a practical example.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Validation of high-performance liquid chromatography methods for pharmaceutical analysis. Understanding the differences and similarities between validation requirements of the US Food and Drug Administration, the US Pharmacopeia and the International Conference on Harmonization.

              One of the most critical factors in developing pharmaceutical drug substances and drug products today is ensuring that the HPLC analytical test methods that are used to analyze the products generate meaningful data. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and United States Pharmacopeia (USP) have each recognized the importance of this to the drug development process and have separately increased validation requirements in recent years. A third source, the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), has added requirements that, when combined with the previous two sources, have led to three different sets of validation requirements leaving the industry in a state of confusion. This paper is written to clear up the confusion over the validation requirements that are presented by each of these three sources.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                25 February 2014
                : 9
                : 2
                : e89908
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Clinical and Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Aston Pharmacy School, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
                [3 ]School of Medicine, Queen's University Belfast and Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom
                [4 ]Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [5 ]Arthritis Research UK Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology at University College London, University College London Hospital and Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
                [6 ]Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, The Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
                Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Italy
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: JCM AFH MR LRW MWB. Performed the experiments: AA AFH MR LRW MWB JCM. Analyzed the data: AFH AA JCM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JCM AFH MR LRW MWB. Wrote the paper: AFH JCM.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-41550
                10.1371/journal.pone.0089908
                3934981
                24587116
                4a9fa9c4-d0e0-4674-9ec1-ae969e5c6d24
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 11 October 2013
                : 24 January 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                The authors would like to acknowledge the funding received from Arthritis Research UK (ARUK; Grant no. 19421; http://www.arthritisresearchuk.org/). LW is partly supported by a grant from Great Ormond Street Childrens Chairty (Grant no. V1304). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Population biology
                Epidemiology
                Epidemiological methods
                Chemistry
                Analytical chemistry
                Medicine
                Diagnostic medicine
                Test evaluation
                Epidemiology
                Epidemiological methods
                Pediatric epidemiology
                Pediatrics
                Rheumatology

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article