14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Low‐Altitude High‐Latitude Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Is Feasible With Existing Aircraft

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) is a proposed method of climate intervention in which aerosols or their precursors would be injected into the stratosphere to reduce or halt global warming. It is often assumed that to produce a substantial global cooling, SAI would require a fleet of specially designed high‐altitude aircraft. However, in the extra‐tropics, where the tropopause is lower, injection into the stratosphere using existing large jets is plausible. Here, we simulate an ensemble of 41 short stratospheric aerosol injection simulations in the UK Earth System Model in which we vary the altitude, latitude, and season of injection. For each simulation, we diagnose aerosol optical depth and radiative forcing and estimate the global cooling under a sustained deployment. For altitudes up to around 14 km, high‐latitude injection maximizes global forcing efficiency. Aerosol lifetime variation is the largest contributor to changes in efficiency with injection location. Seasonal SAI deployment with low‐altitude (13 km) and high‐latitude (60°N/S) injection achieves 35% of the forcing efficiency of a high‐altitude (20 km), annually constant, sub‐tropical (30°N/S) strategy. Low‐altitude high‐latitude SAI would have strongly reduced efficiency and therefore increased side‐effects for a given global cooling. It would also produce a more polar cooling distribution, with reduced efficacy in the tropics. However, it would face lower technical barriers because existing large jets could be used for deployment. This could imply an increase in the number of actors able to deploy SAI, an earlier potential start date, and perhaps a greater risk of unilateral deployment.

          Plain Language Summary

          Stratospheric aerosol injection is a proposed method of cooling the planet and reducing the impacts of climate change by adding a layer of small particles to the high atmosphere, where they would reflect a fraction of incoming sunlight. While it is likely that SAI could reduce global temperature, it has many serious risks and would not perfectly offset climate change. Most SAI deployment scenarios envisage releasing material 20 or more kilometres above the ground, altitudes well above the limit of large commercial aircraft. These deployments would require the development of novel, specially designed, aircraft. Here, we use new climate model simulations to assess how effective SAI could be if the altitude of release was lower, including at altitudes within the reach of existing large jets. These lower altitude strategies must also inject at more polar latitudes, since the stratosphere is lower in the polar regions. Our results suggest SAI could meaningfully cool the planet even if using only existing jets, if injection is in the high latitudes during spring and summer. However, this low‐altitude strategy requires three times more injection than high‐altitude SAI, and so would strongly increase side‐effects such as acid rain.

          Key Points

          • Seasonal SAI with low‐altitude high‐latitude injection achieves 35% of the forcing efficiency of a high‐altitude subtropical strategy

          • If injection altitude is limited to below 14 km, then high‐latitude injection maximizes efficiency for annually constant injections

          • Low‐altitude high‐latitude SAI with large existing jets is feasible, but with strong disadvantages relative to a high‐altitude strategy

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The ERA5 Global Reanalysis

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979

            In recent decades, the warming in the Arctic has been much faster than in the rest of the world, a phenomenon known as Arctic amplification. Numerous studies report that the Arctic is warming either twice, more than twice, or even three times as fast as the globe on average. Here we show, by using several observational datasets which cover the Arctic region, that during the last 43 years the Arctic has been warming nearly four times faster than the globe, which is a higher ratio than generally reported in literature. We compared the observed Arctic amplification ratio with the ratio simulated by state-of-the-art climate models, and found that the observed four-fold warming ratio over 1979–2021 is an extremely rare occasion in the climate model simulations. The observed and simulated amplification ratios are more consistent with each other if calculated over a longer period; however the comparison is obscured by observational uncertainties before 1979. Our results indicate that the recent four-fold Arctic warming ratio is either an extremely unlikely event, or the climate models systematically tend to underestimate the amplification.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              UKESM1: Description and evaluation of the UK Earth System Model

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Earth's Future
                Earth's Future
                American Geophysical Union (AGU)
                2328-4277
                2328-4277
                April 2025
                April 28 2025
                April 2025
                : 13
                : 4
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Earth Sciences University College London London UK
                [2 ] Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling University College London London UK
                [3 ] Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Exeter Exeter UK
                [4 ] Yale School of the Environment New Haven CT USA
                [5 ] Mossavar‐Rahmani Center for Business and Government Harvard Kennedy School Cambridge MA USA
                Article
                10.1029/2024EF005567
                4aa04ac0-b6e9-468b-8459-7fd4bab454ce
                © 2025

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log