84
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The National Osteoporosis Foundation’s position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: a systematic review and implementation recommendations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Lifestyle choices influence 20–40 % of adult peak bone mass. Therefore, optimization of lifestyle factors known to influence peak bone mass and strength is an important strategy aimed at reducing risk of osteoporosis or low bone mass later in life. The National Osteoporosis Foundation has issued this scientific statement to provide evidence-based guidance and a national implementation strategy for the purpose of helping individuals achieve maximal peak bone mass early in life. In this scientific statement, we (1) report the results of an evidence-based review of the literature since 2000 on factors that influence achieving the full genetic potential for skeletal mass; (2) recommend lifestyle choices that promote maximal bone health throughout the lifespan; (3) outline a research agenda to address current gaps; and (4) identify implementation strategies. We conducted a systematic review of the role of individual nutrients, food patterns, special issues, contraceptives, and physical activity on bone mass and strength development in youth. An evidence grading system was applied to describe the strength of available evidence on these individual modifiable lifestyle factors that may (or may not) influence the development of peak bone mass (Table 1). A summary of the grades for each of these factors is given below. We describe the underpinning biology of these relationships as well as other factors for which a systematic review approach was not possible. Articles published since 2000, all of which followed the report by Heaney et al. [ 1] published in that year, were considered for this scientific statement. This current review is a systematic update of the previous review conducted by the National Osteoporosis Foundation [ 1].

          Lifestyle Factor Grade
          Macronutrients
           Fat D
           Protein C
          Micronutrients
           Calcium A
           Vitamin D B
           Micronutrients other than calcium and vitamin D D
          Food Patterns
           Dairy B
           Fiber C
           Fruits and vegetables C
           Detriment of cola and caffeinated beverages C
          Infant Nutrition
           Duration of breastfeeding D
           Breastfeeding versus formula feeding D
           Enriched formula feeding D
          Adolescent Special Issues
           Detriment of oral contraceptives D
           Detriment of DMPA injections B
           Detriment of alcohol D
           Detriment of smoking C
          Physical Activity and Exercise
           Effect on bone mass and density A
           Effect on bone structural outcomes B

          Considering the evidence-based literature review, we recommend lifestyle choices that promote maximal bone health from childhood through young to late adolescence and outline a research agenda to address current gaps in knowledge. The best evidence (grade A) is available for positive effects of calcium intake and physical activity, especially during the late childhood and peripubertal years—a critical period for bone accretion. Good evidence is also available for a role of vitamin D and dairy consumption and a detriment of DMPA injections. However, more rigorous trial data on many other lifestyle choices are needed and this need is outlined in our research agenda. Implementation strategies for lifestyle modifications to promote development of peak bone mass and strength within one’s genetic potential require a multisectored (i.e., family, schools, healthcare systems) approach.

          Related collections

          Most cited references342

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prevention of rickets and vitamin D deficiency in infants, children, and adolescents.

          Rickets in infants attributable to inadequate vitamin D intake and decreased exposure to sunlight continues to be reported in the United States. There are also concerns for vitamin D deficiency in older children and adolescents. Because there are limited natural dietary sources of vitamin D and adequate sunshine exposure for the cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D is not easily determined for a given individual and may increase the risk of skin cancer, the recommendations to ensure adequate vitamin D status have been revised to include all infants, including those who are exclusively breastfed and older children and adolescents. It is now recommended that all infants and children, including adolescents, have a minimum daily intake of 400 IU of vitamin D beginning soon after birth. The current recommendation replaces the previous recommendation of a minimum daily intake of 200 IU/day of vitamin D supplementation beginning in the first 2 months after birth and continuing through adolescence. These revised guidelines for vitamin D intake for healthy infants, children, and adolescents are based on evidence from new clinical trials and the historical precedence of safely giving 400 IU of vitamin D per day in the pediatric and adolescent population. New evidence supports a potential role for vitamin D in maintaining innate immunity and preventing diseases such as diabetes and cancer. The new data may eventually refine what constitutes vitamin D sufficiency or deficiency.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An assessment of self-reported physical activity instruments in young people for population surveillance: Project ALPHA

            Background The assessment of physical activity is an essential part of understanding patterns and influences of behaviour, designing interventions, and undertaking population surveillance and monitoring, but it is particularly problematic when using self-report instruments with young people. This study reviewed available self-report physical activity instruments developed for use with children and adolescents to assess their suitability and feasibility for use in population surveillance systems, particularly in Europe. Methods Systematic searches and review, supplemented by expert panel assessment. Results Papers (n = 437) were assessed as potentially relevant; 89 physical activity measures were identified with 20 activity-based measures receiving detailed assessment. Three received support from the majority of the expert group: Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children/Adolescents (PAQ-C/PAQ-A), Youth Risk Behaviour Surveillance Survey (YRBS), and the Teen Health Survey. Conclusions Population surveillance of youth physical activity is strongly recommended and those involved in developing and undertaking this task should consider the three identified shortlisted instruments and evaluate their appropriateness for application within their national context. Further development and testing of measures suitable for population surveillance with young people is required.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Bone mineral accrual from 8 to 30 years of age: an estimation of peak bone mass.

              Bone area (BA) and bone mineral content (BMC) were measured from childhood to young adulthood at the total body (TB), lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH), and femoral neck (FN). BA and BMC values were expressed as a percentage of young-adult values to determine if and when values reached a plateau. Data were aligned on biological ages [years from peak height velocity (PHV)] to control for maturity. TB BA increased significantly from -4 to +4 years from PHV, with TB BMC reaching a plateau, on average, 2 years later at +6 years from PHV (equates to 18 and 20 years of age in girls and boys, respectively). LS BA increased significantly from -4 years from PHV to +3 years from PHV, whereas LS BMC increased until +4 from PHV. FN BA increased between -4 and +1 years from PHV, with FN BMC reaching a plateau, on average, 1 year later at +2 years from PHV. In the circumpubertal years (-2 to +2 years from PHV): 39% of the young-adult BMC was accrued at the TB in both males and females; 43% and 46% was accrued in males and females at the LS and TH, respectively; 33% (males and females) was accrued at the FN. In summary, we provide strong evidence that BA plateaus 1 to 2 years earlier than BMC. Depending on the skeletal site, peak bone mass occurs by the end of the second or early in the third decade of life. The data substantiate the importance of the circumpubertal years for accruing bone mineral. Copyright © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                270-839-1776 , taylor.wallace@me.com
                Journal
                Osteoporos Int
                Osteoporos Int
                Osteoporosis International
                Springer London (London )
                0937-941X
                1433-2965
                8 February 2016
                8 February 2016
                2016
                : 27
                : 1281-1386
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Nutritional Sciences, Women’s Global Health Institute, Purdue University, 700 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
                [ ]Division of Adolescent and Transition Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 4000, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
                [ ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3230 Eden Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
                [ ]Departments of Health and Human Physiology and Epidemiology, University of Iowa, 130 E FH, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
                [ ]Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 7035, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
                [ ]Schools of Nursing and Medicine, Creighton University, 601 N. 30th Street, Omaha, NE 68131 USA
                [ ]Department of Foods and Nutrition, University of Georgia, Dawson Hall, Athens, GA 30602 USA
                [ ]The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, 3535 Market Street, Room 1560, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
                [ ]Department of Nutrition and Food Studies, George Mason University, MS 1 F8, 10340 Democracy Lane, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
                [ ]National Osteoporosis Foundation, 1150 17th Street NW, Suite 850, Washington, DC 20036 USA
                [ ]University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3535 Market Street, Room 1560, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
                [ ]Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 3535 Market Street, Room 1560, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
                [ ]National Osteoporosis Foundation, 251 18th Street South, Suite 630, Arlington, VA 22202 USA
                Article
                3440
                10.1007/s00198-015-3440-3
                4791473
                26856587
                4aab373a-e074-4f00-9175-3645891105f8
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 20 October 2015
                : 10 November 2015
                Categories
                Position Paper
                Custom metadata
                © International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2016

                Orthopedics
                bone mineral content,diet,nutrition,peak bone mass,physical activity
                Orthopedics
                bone mineral content, diet, nutrition, peak bone mass, physical activity

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content84

                Cited by387

                Most referenced authors3,823