257
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    3
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Selection of Conserved Blocks from Multiple Alignments for Their Use in Phylogenetic Analysis

      Molecular Biology and Evolution
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The use of some multiple-sequence alignments in phylogenetic analysis, particularly those that are not very well conserved, requires the elimination of poorly aligned positions and divergent regions, since they may not be homologous or may have been saturated by multiple substitutions. A computerized method that eliminates such positions and at the same time tries to minimize the loss of informative sites is presented here. The method is based on the selection of blocks of positions that fulfill a simple set of requirements with respect to the number of contiguous conserved positions, lack of gaps, and high conservation of flanking positions, making the final alignment more suitable for phylogenetic analysis. To illustrate the efficiency of this method, alignments of 10 mitochondrial proteins from several completely sequenced mitochondrial genomes belonging to diverse eukaryotes were used as examples. The percentages of removed positions were higher in the most divergent alignments. After removing divergent segments, the amino acid composition of the different sequences was more uniform, and pairwise distances became much smaller. Phylogenetic trees show that topologies can be different after removing conserved blocks, particularly when there are several poorly resolved nodes. Strong support was found for the grouping of animals and fungi but not for the position of more basal eukaryotes. The use of a computerized method such as the one presented here reduces to a certain extent the necessity of manually editing multiple alignments, makes the automation of phylogenetic analysis of large data sets feasible, and facilitates the reproduction of the final alignment by other researchers.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Molecular Biology and Evolution
          Oxford University Press (OUP)
          1537-1719
          0737-4038
          April 2000
          April 01 2000
          April 2000
          April 2000
          April 01 2000
          April 2000
          : 17
          : 4
          : 540-552
          Article
          10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334
          10742046
          4ab53e90-e1d8-4156-8116-ff51dd200c10
          © 2000
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article