1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Red Blood Cell Transfusion in the Emergency Department: An Observational Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: We aimed to describe red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in the emergency department (ED) with a particular focus on the hemoglobin (Hb) level thresholds that are used in this setting. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 12 EDs including all adult patients that received RBC transfusion in January and February 2018. Descriptive statistics were reported. Logistic regression was performed to assess variables that were independently associated with a pre-transfusion Hb level ≥ 8 g/dL. Results: During the study period, 529 patients received RBC transfusion. The median age was 74 (59–85) years. The patients had a history of cancer or hematological disease in 185 (35.2%) cases. Acute bleeding was observed in the ED for 242 (44.7%) patients, among which 145 (59.9%) were gastrointestinal. Anemia was chronic in 191 (40.2%) cases, mostly due to vitamin or iron deficiency or to malignancy with transfusion support. Pre-transfusion Hb level was 6.9 (6.0–7.8) g/dL. The transfusion motive was not notified in the medical chart in 206 (38.9%) cases. In the multivariable logistic regression, variables that were associated with a higher pre-transfusion Hb level (≥8 g/dL) were a history of coronary artery disease (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.29–3.41), the presence of acute bleeding (OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.53–3.94), and older age (OR: 1.02/year; 95% CI: 1.01–1.04). Conclusion: RBC transfusion in the ED was an everyday concern and involved patients with heterogeneous medical situations and severity. Pre-transfusion Hb level was rather restrictive. Almost half of transfusions were provided because of acute bleeding which was associated with a higher Hb threshold.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Transfusion strategies for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

          The hemoglobin threshold for transfusion of red cells in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding is controversial. We compared the efficacy and safety of a restrictive transfusion strategy with those of a liberal transfusion strategy. We enrolled 921 patients with severe acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding and randomly assigned 461 of them to a restrictive strategy (transfusion when the hemoglobin level fell below 7 g per deciliter) and 460 to a liberal strategy (transfusion when the hemoglobin fell below 9 g per deciliter). Randomization was stratified according to the presence or absence of liver cirrhosis. A total of 225 patients assigned to the restrictive strategy (51%), as compared with 61 assigned to the liberal strategy (14%), did not receive transfusions (P<0.001) [corrected].The probability of survival at 6 weeks was higher in the restrictive-strategy group than in the liberal-strategy group (95% vs. 91%; hazard ratio for death with restrictive strategy, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33 to 0.92; P=0.02). Further bleeding occurred in 10% of the patients in the restrictive-strategy group as compared with 16% of the patients in the liberal-strategy group (P=0.01), and adverse events occurred in 40% as compared with 48% (P=0.02). The probability of survival was slightly higher with the restrictive strategy than with the liberal strategy in the subgroup of patients who had bleeding associated with a peptic ulcer (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.25) and was significantly higher in the subgroup of patients with cirrhosis and Child-Pugh class A or B disease (hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.85), but not in those with cirrhosis and Child-Pugh class C disease (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.45 to 2.37). Within the first 5 days, the portal-pressure gradient increased significantly in patients assigned to the liberal strategy (P=0.03) but not in those assigned to the restrictive strategy. As compared with a liberal transfusion strategy, a restrictive strategy significantly improved outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. (Funded by Fundació Investigació Sant Pau; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00414713.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patient Blood Management

            Blood transfusion is one of the most frequently used therapies worldwide and is associated with benefits, risks, and costs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

              Bias and precision statistics have succeeded regression analysis when measurement techniques are compared. However, when applied to cardiac output measurements, inconsistencies occur in reporting the results of this form of analysis. A MEDLINE search was performed, dating from 1986. Studies comparing techniques of cardiac output measurement using bias and precision statistics were surveyed. An error-gram was constructed from the percentage errors in the test and reference methods and was used to determine acceptable limits of agreement between methods. Twenty-five articles were found. Presentation of statistical data varied greatly. Four different statistical parameters were used to describe the agreement between measurements. The overall limits of agreement in studies evaluating bioimpedance (n = 23) was +/-37% (15-82%) and in those evaluating Doppler ultrasound (n = 11) +/-65% (25-225%). Objective criteria used to assess outcome were given in only 44% of the articles. These were (i) limits of agreement approaching +/-15-20%, (ii) limits of agreement of less than 1 L/min, and (iii) more than 75% of bias measurements within +/-20% of the mean. Graphically, we showed that limits of agreement of up to +/-30% were acceptable. When using bias and precision statistics, cardiac output, bias, limits of agreement, and percentage error should be presented. Using current reference methods, acceptance of a new technique should rely on limits of agreement of up to +/-30%.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                02 June 2021
                June 2021
                : 10
                : 11
                : 2475
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Emergency Department, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France; danaegamelon@ 123456gmail.com (D.G.); romain.brune@ 123456gmail.com (R.B.); jean-paul.fontaine@ 123456aphp.fr (J.-P.F.)
                [2 ]Emergency Department, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75010 Paris, France; anthony.chauvin@ 123456aphp.fr
                [3 ]Emergency Department, Hôpital Bichat, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75018 Paris, France; danielaiham.ghazali@ 123456aphp.fr
                [4 ]Emergency Department, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75012 Paris, France; youri.yordanov@ 123456aphp.fr
                [5 ]Emergency Department, Hôpital André Mignot, 78300 Versailles, France; aude.arsicaud@ 123456gmail.com
                [6 ]Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 94000 Créteil, France; pauline.gilleron@ 123456aphp.fr
                [7 ]Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 92024 Clichy, France; sonja.curac@ 123456aphp.fr
                [8 ]Hôpital Pitié Salpetrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75013 Paris, France; Marie-caroline.richard@ 123456aphp.fr
                [9 ]Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75015 Paris, France; anne-laure.feral-pierssens@ 123456aphp.fr
                [10 ]Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75014 Paris, France; barbara.villoing@ 123456aphp.fr
                [11 ]Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 92100 Boulogne, France; sebastien.beaune@ 123456aphp.fr
                [12 ]Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75020 Paris, France; helene.goulet@ 123456aphp.fr
                [13 ]Etablissement Français du Sang Ile de France, 75010 Paris, France; anne.francois@ 123456efs.sante.fr
                [14 ]Etablissement Français du Sang Ile de France, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Est Créteil, INSERM U955, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, 94000 Créteil, France; france.pirenne@ 123456efs.sante.fr
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: o.peyrony@ 123456hotmail.fr ; Tel.: +33-1-42-49-84-04
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6831-0054
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8819-0061
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0129-4322
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0671-6547
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9299-6703
                Article
                jcm-10-02475
                10.3390/jcm10112475
                8199757
                4ad372a2-0a63-467f-9f5a-6c6038671acb
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 03 May 2021
                : 31 May 2021
                Categories
                Article

                transfusion,red blood cell,blood product,anemia,hemoglobin,emergency department

                Comments

                Comment on this article