22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Diffusion and dissemination of evidence-based dietary strategies for the prevention of cancer

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We used a systematic review to identify strategies that have been evaluated for disseminating cancer control interventions that promote the uptake of a healthy diet in adults. Studies were identified by contacting technical experts and by searching medline, PreMedline, cancerlit, embase/Excerpta Medica, Psyc info, cinahl, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and reference lists. English-language primary studies were selected if they evaluated the dissemination of healthy diet interventions to individuals, health care providers, or institutions. Studies involving only children or adolescents were excluded.

          We retrieved 101 articles for full-text screening, and identified nine reports of seven distinct studies. Four of the studies were randomized trials, one was a cohort design, and three were descriptive studies. Six of the studies were rated methodologically weak, and one was rated moderate. Because of heterogeneity, low methodological quality, and incomplete data reporting, the studies were not pooled for meta-analysis. No beneficial dissemination strategies were found. One strategy involving the use of peer educators at the work site, which led to a short-term increase in fruit and vegetable intake, looks promising.

          Overall, the quality of the evidence is not strong, and the evidence that exists is more descriptive than evaluative. No clear conclusions can be drawn from these data. Controlled studies are needed to evaluate dissemination strategies and to compare dissemination and diffusion strategies that communicate different messages and target different audiences.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cancer: improving early detection and prevention. A community practice randomised trial.

          To test the impact of physician education and facilitator assisted office system interventions on cancer early detection and preventive services. A randomised trial of two interventions alone and in combination. Physicians in 98 ambulatory care practices in the United States. The education intervention consisted of a day long physician meeting directed at improving knowledge, attitudes, and skills relevant to cancer prevention and early detection. The office system intervention consisted of assistance from a project facilitator in establishing routines for providing needed services. These routines included division of responsibilities for providing services among physicians and their staff and the use of medical record flow sheets. The proportions of patients provided the cancer prevention and early detection services indicated annually according to the US National Cancer Institute. Based on cross sectional patient surveys, the office system intervention was associated with an increase in mammography, the recommendation to do breast self examination, clinical breast examination, faecal occult blood testing, advice to quit smoking, and the recommendation to decrease dietary fat. Education was associated only with an increase in mammography. Record review for a patient cohort confirmed cross sectional survey findings regarding the office system for mammography and faecal occult blood testing. Community practices assisted by a facilitator in the development and implementation of an office system can substantially improve provision of cancer early detection and preventive services.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Children's fruit and vegetable intake: Socioeconomic, adult-child, regional, and urban-rural influences

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of training on adoption of cancer prevention nutrition-related activities by primary care practices: results of a randomized, controlled study.

              The National Cancer Institute (NCI) developed a manual to guide primary care practices in structuring their office environment and routine visits so as to enhance nutrition screening, advice/referral, and follow-up for cancer prevention. The adoption of the manual's recommendations by primary care practices was evaluated by examining two strategies: physician training on how to implement the manual's recommendations versus simple mailing of the manual. This article reports on the results of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of these two strategies. A three-arm, randomized, controlled study. Free-standing primary care physician practices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Each study practice was randomly assigned to one of three groups. The training group practices were invited to send one member from their practice of their choosing to a 3-hour "train-a-trainer" workshop, the manual-only-group practices were mailed the nutrition manual, and the control group practices received no intervention. For training group practices, training was provided in the four major components of the nutrition manual: how to organize the office environment to support cancer prevention nutrition-related activities; how to screen patient adherence to the NCI dietary guidelines; how to provide dietary advice/referral; and how to implement a patient follow-up system to support patients in making changes in their nutrition-related behaviors. The primary outcomes of the study were derived from two evaluation instruments. The observation instrument documented the tools and procedures recommended by the nutrition manual and adopted in patient charts and the office environment. The in-person structured interview evaluated the physician and staff's self-reported nutrition-related activities reflecting the nutrition manual's recommendations. Data from these two instruments were used to construct four adherence scores corresponding to the areas: office organization, nutrition screening, nutrition advice/referral, and patient follow-up. The adoption of the manual's recommendations was highest among the practices in the training group as reflected by their higher adherence scores. They organized their office ( P =.005) and screened their patients regarding their eating habits ( P =.046) significantly more closely to the recommendations of the nutrition manual than practices in the manual-only group. However, despite being the highest in compliance, the training group practices were only 54.9% adherent to the manual's recommendations regarding nutrition advice/referral, and 28.5% adherent to its recommendations on office organization, 23.5% adherent to its recommendations on nutrition screening, and 14.6% adherent to its patient follow-up recommendations. Primary care practices exposed to the nutrition manual in a training session adopted more of the manual's recommendations. Specifically, practices invited to training were more likely to perform nutrition screening and to structure their office environment to be conducive to providing nutrition-related services for cancer prevention. The impact of the training was moderate and not statistically significant for nutrition advice/referral or patient follow-up, which are important in achieving long-term dietary changes in patients. The overall low adherence scores to nutrition-related activities demonstrates that there is plenty of room for improvement among the practices in the training group.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Curr Oncol
                CO
                Current Oncology
                Multimed Inc. (66 Martin St. Milton, ON, Canada L9T 2R2 )
                1198-0052
                August 2006
                : 13
                : 4
                : 130-140
                Affiliations
                [* ] School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
                [] Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (CEB), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
                [] Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-based Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
                [§ ] Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario.
                [|| ] McMaster University Evidence-based Practice Center, Hamilton, Ontario
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Parminder Raina, E-mail: praina@ 123456mcmaster.ca
                Article
                co13_4p130
                1891184
                17576454
                4b03b64a-89ab-4169-9008-5f81cd409a92
                2006 Multimed Inc.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Review Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                dietary habits,cancer control interventions,information dissemination,review

                Comments

                Comment on this article