57
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      When “AA” is long but “A” is not short: speakers who distinguish short and long vowels in production do not necessarily encode a short–long contrast in their phonological lexicon

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In some languages (such as Dutch), speakers produce duration differences between vowels, but it is unclear whether they also encode short versus long speech sounds into different phonological categories. To examine whether they have abstract representations for ‘short’ versus ‘long’ contrasts, we assessed Dutch listeners’ perceptual sensitivity to duration in two vowel qualities: [a] and [ɑ], as in the words maan ‘moon’ and man ‘man,’ which are realized with long and short duration respectively. If Dutch represents this phonetic durational difference as a ‘short’–‘long’ contrast in its phonology, duration changes in [a] and [ɑ] should elicit similar neural responses [specifically, the mismatch negativity (MMN)]. However, we found that duration changes evoked larger MMN amplitude for [a] than for [ɑ]. This finding indicates that duration is phonemically relevant for the maan-vowel that is represented as ‘long,’ while it is not phonemically specified for the man-vowel. We argue that speakers who in speech production distinguish a given vowel pair on the basis of duration may not necessarily encode this durational distinction as a binary ‘short’–‘long’ contrast in their phonological lexicon.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review.

          In the present article, the basic research using the mismatch negativity (MMN) and analogous results obtained by using the magnetoencephalography (MEG) and other brain-imaging technologies is reviewed. This response is elicited by any discriminable change in auditory stimulation but recent studies extended the notion of the MMN even to higher-order cognitive processes such as those involving grammar and semantic meaning. Moreover, MMN data also show the presence of automatic intelligent processes such as stimulus anticipation at the level of auditory cortex. In addition, the MMN enables one to establish the brain processes underlying the initiation of attention switch to, conscious perception of, sound change in an unattended stimulus stream.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm).

            The present article outlines the contribution of the mismatch negativity (MMN), and its magnetic equivalent MMNm, to our understanding of the perception of speech sounds in the human brain. MMN data indicate that each sound, both speech and nonspeech, develops its neural representation corresponding to the percept of this sound in the neurophysiological substrate of auditory sensory memory. The accuracy of this representation, determining the accuracy of the discrimination between different sounds, can be probed with MMN separately for any auditory feature (e.g., frequency or duration) or stimulus type such as phonemes. Furthermore, MMN data show that the perception of phonemes, and probably also of larger linguistic units (syllables and words), is based on language-specific phonetic traces developed in the posterior part of the left-hemisphere auditory cortex. These traces serve as recognition models for the corresponding speech sounds in listening to speech. MMN studies further suggest that these language-specific traces for the mother tongue develop during the first few months of life. Moreover, MMN can also index the development of such traces for a foreign language learned later in life. MMN data have also revealed the existence of such neuronal populations in the human brain that can encode acoustic invariances specific to each speech sound, which could explain correct speech perception irrespective of the acoustic variation between the different speakers and word context.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Patterns of Sounds

              Maddieson (2010)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                24 April 2015
                2015
                : 6
                : 438
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [2] 2The MARCS Institute, University of Western Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [3] 3Jean-Uhrmacher-Institute for Clinical ENT Research, University of Cologne Cologne, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Ruth De Diego-Balaguer, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Spain

                Reviewed by: Adam Charles Roberts, University of Oxford, UK; Suzanne V. H. Van Der Feest, The University of Texas at Austin, USA

                *Correspondence: Kateřina Chládková, Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 210, 1012VT Amsterdam, Netherlands k.chladkova@ 123456uva.nl

                This article was submitted to Language Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00438
                4408753
                25964766
                4b4593e5-90ef-4cca-8f19-0b057163055f
                Copyright © 2015 Chládková, Escudero and Lipski.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 11 November 2014
                : 27 March 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 35, Pages: 8, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                phonological representations,vowel length,mismatch negativity,duration processing,short–long contrast

                Comments

                Comment on this article