6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an intervention to reduce older adults’ sedentary behavior

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Older adults represent the segment of the population that sits the most. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, safety, and preliminary efficacy of an intervention to reduce sedentary behavior (SB) in older adults that can be disseminated broadly for limited cost and delivered by paraprofessionals with limited training. Senior centers in Central Pennsylvania were randomized to receive one of two healthy aging programs (i.e., intervention or comparison). Participants in both groups attended three 90-min meetings over 2 weeks. Behavior change content was delivered at the second session (i.e., day 7). Forty-two participants ( n intervention = 25, n comparison = 17) were recruited from five senior centers. Content for the intervention group focused on reducing SB while comparison group content focused on reducing social isolation. Self-reported SB was assessed on days 7 and 14. Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant group × time interaction for total and weekday, but not weekend, SB. In the week following the delivery of group content, participants in the intervention group reported an average decrease in total SB of 837.8 min/week; however, the comparison group reported a nonsignificant average decrease of 263.0 min/week of total SB. Participants in the intervention group also reported an average decrease in weekday SB of 132.6 min/weekday ( d = −0.83) in the week following the delivery of group content; however, the comparison group reported a nonsignificant decrease of 24.0 min/weekday ( d = −0.16). There were no significant changes in weekend SB in either group in the week following the delivery of group content. Participants’ attendance, measurement completion, and program ratings were high. Safety issues were minimal. This intervention was feasible to implement and evaluate, acceptable to older adults, and showed promise for reducing older adults’ SB.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          jmaher@usc.edu
          mjs56@psu.edu
          dec9@psu.edu
          Journal
          Transl Behav Med
          Transl Behav Med
          Translational Behavioral Medicine
          Springer US (New York )
          1869-6716
          1613-9860
          12 October 2016
          March 2017
          : 7
          : 1
          : 52-61
          Affiliations
          [1 ] ISNI 0000 0001 2097 4281, GRID grid.29857.31, , The Pennsylvania State University, ; University Park, PA USA
          [2 ] ISNI 0000 0001 2156 6853, GRID grid.42505.36, , University of Southern California, ; Los Angeles, CA USA
          [3 ] ISNI 0000 0001 2299 3507, GRID grid.16753.36, , Northwestern University, ; Chicago, IL USA
          Article
          PMC5352635 PMC5352635 5352635 394
          10.1007/s13142-016-0394-8
          5352635
          27734281
          4b5a58b7-8b80-4cb2-80df-183ee802ffd7
          © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2016
          History
          Funding
          Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006108, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences;
          Award ID: UL1 TR000127
          Award Recipient :
          Categories
          Practice Tools
          Custom metadata
          © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2017

          Aging,Sitting,Behavior change,Dual-process,Hybrid intervention

          Comments

          Comment on this article