10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Extracervical Approaches to Thyroid Surgery: Evolution and Review

      review-article
      Minimally Invasive Surgery
      Hindawi

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Over the last two decades, advances and adaptation of technology have led to a variety of endoscopic thyroidectomy procedures being performed. The drive for extracervical procedures has been predominantly influenced by the desire for improved cosmesis via avoidance of visible scars. Extracervical techniques have shown considerable evolution with approaches that have included transaxillary, breast, postauricular, and transoral routes. There has been a varied evidence base for each of these approaches with regard to technical feasibility, safety, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. In recent years, robotic-assisted thyroid surgery has gained increased popularity worldwide with the introduction of the da Vinci Robot. Reports of improved postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction have been in contrast to the financial burden, longer operative time, and increased training required which, to date, have limited widespread application. The aim of this review is to describe the evolution of extracervical procedures including surgical approaches, outcomes, advantages, and disadvantages. Consideration is also given to the future direction of extracervical thyroid surgery with regard to the safety, feasibility, and application of robotic systems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references106

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Endoscopic right thyroid lobectomy.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Endoscopic subtotal parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.

            M Gagner (1996)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Should all papillary thyroid microcarcinomas be aggressively treated? An analysis of 18,445 cases.

              The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors that predict papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC)-related death in a large patient population to determine which patients need aggressive treatment. The management of PTMC is controversial and ranges from observation to total thyroidectomy. The lack of consensus is predominantly due to the general excellent overall prognosis, thereby requiring a large cohort to delineate differences in outcome. All papillary thyroid cancer patients with tumor size of 1 cm or less in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Cancer Database from 1988 to 2007 were identified. Outcomes, including overall and disease-specific survival, were compared, and different risk groups were evaluated by multivariate analysis. A total of 18,445 cases of PTMC with surgery were identified. The 10-year and 15-year overall survivals were 94.6% and 90.7%, respectively, while disease-specific survivals were 99.5% and 99.3%. Age greater than 45 years, male sex, African American or minority race, node metastases, extrathyroidal invasion, and distant metastases were stratified to be significant risk factors for overall survival. There were 49 thyroid cancer-related deaths. Forty-five (92%) of the 49 patients had at least 2 risk factors, and 51% of these 49 patients had 3 or more risk factors (vs 5.7% in the rest of the cohort, P < 0.001). Although PTMC is generally associated with an excellent prognosis, 0.5% patients may die of PTMC. The presence of 2 or more risk factors is strongly associated with cancer-related mortality and can help to identify patients who should be considered for more aggressive management.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Minim Invasive Surg
                Minim Invasive Surg
                MIS
                Minimally Invasive Surgery
                Hindawi
                2090-1445
                2090-1453
                2019
                20 August 2019
                : 2019
                : 5961690
                Affiliations
                Imperial College Healthcare NHS trust, London, UK
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Othmar Schöb

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-168X
                Article
                10.1155/2019/5961690
                6719267
                31531238
                4b80efc5-85ee-4e41-860c-a87b5068fd8b
                Copyright © 2019 B. M. Sephton.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 November 2018
                : 10 June 2019
                : 28 July 2019
                Categories
                Review Article

                Surgery
                Surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article