33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The emergence of collective knowledge and cumulative culture in animals, humans and machines

      introduction

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references163

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish.

          Determining individual-level interactions that govern highly coordinated motion in animal groups or cellular aggregates has been a long-standing challenge, central to understanding the mechanisms and evolution of collective behavior. Numerous models have been proposed, many of which display realistic-looking dynamics, but nonetheless rely on untested assumptions about how individuals integrate information to guide movement. Here we infer behavioral rules directly from experimental data. We begin by analyzing trajectories of golden shiners (Notemigonus crysoleucas) swimming in two-fish and three-fish shoals to map the mean effective forces as a function of fish positions and velocities. Speeding and turning responses are dynamically modulated and clearly delineated. Speed regulation is a dominant component of how fish interact, and changes in speed are transmitted to those both behind and ahead. Alignment emerges from attraction and repulsion, and fish tend to copy directional changes made by those ahead. We find no evidence for explicit matching of body orientation. By comparing data from two-fish and three-fish shoals, we challenge the standard assumption, ubiquitous in physics-inspired models of collective behavior, that individual motion results from averaging responses to each neighbor considered separately; three-body interactions make a substantial contribution to fish dynamics. However, pairwise interactions qualitatively capture the correct spatial interaction structure in small groups, and this structure persists in larger groups of 10 and 30 fish. The interactions revealed here may help account for the rapid changes in speed and direction that enable real animal groups to stay cohesive and amplify important social information.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior.

            The origins of modern human behavior are marked by increased symbolic and technological complexity in the archaeological record. In western Eurasia this transition, the Upper Paleolithic, occurred about 45,000 years ago, but many of its features appear transiently in southern Africa about 45,000 years earlier. We show that demography is a major determinant in the maintenance of cultural complexity and that variation in regional subpopulation density and/or migratory activity results in spatial structuring of cultural skill accumulation. Genetic estimates of regional population size over time show that densities in early Upper Paleolithic Europe were similar to those in sub-Saharan Africa when modern behavior first appeared. Demographic factors can thus explain geographic variation in the timing of the first appearance of modern behavior without invoking increased cognitive capacity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ratcheting up the ratchet: on the evolution of cumulative culture.

              Some researchers have claimed that chimpanzee and human culture rest on homologous cognitive and learning mechanisms. While clearly there are some homologous mechanisms, we argue here that there are some different mechanisms at work as well. Chimpanzee cultural traditions represent behavioural biases of different populations, all within the species' existing cognitive repertoire (what we call the 'zone of latent solutions') that are generated by founder effects, individual learning and mostly product-oriented (rather than process-oriented) copying. Human culture, in contrast, has the distinctive characteristic that it accumulates modifications over time (what we call the 'ratchet effect'). This difference results from the facts that (i) human social learning is more oriented towards process than product and (ii) unique forms of human cooperation lead to active teaching, social motivations for conformity and normative sanctions against non-conformity. Together, these unique processes of social learning and cooperation lead to humans' unique form of cumulative cultural evolution.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
                Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
                RSTB
                royptb
                Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                The Royal Society
                0962-8436
                1471-2970
                January 31, 2022
                December 13, 2021
                December 13, 2021
                : 377
                : 1843 , Discussion meeting issue ‘The emergence of collective knowledge and cumulative culture in animals, humans and machines’ organized and edited by Andrew Whiten, Dora Biro, Ellen C. Garland and Simon Kirby
                : 20200306
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, Scottish Oceans Institute, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, , St Andrews, UK
                [ 2 ] Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, and Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, , St Andrews, UK
                [ 3 ] Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, , Oxford, UK
                [ 4 ] Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, , Rochester, NY, USA
                [ 5 ] Sorbonne Université, CNRS, , Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique, ISIR, 75005 Paris, France
                [ 6 ] Centre for Language Evolution, University of Edinburgh, , Edinburgh, UK
                Author notes
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-5890
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3408-6274
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8241-7461
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8240-1267
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6496-1340
                Article
                rstb20200306
                10.1098/rstb.2020.0306
                8666904
                34894738
                4b9ed164-3056-4a6d-b11d-4eca33b1b41b
                © 2021 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : October 17, 2021
                : October 21, 2021
                Categories
                1001
                14
                42
                70
                Introduction
                Introduction
                Custom metadata
                January 31, 2022

                Philosophy of science
                collective cognition,collective memory,social learning,culture,cultural evolution,cumulative culture

                Comments

                Comment on this article