47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Consensus Recommendations on Initiating Prescription Therapies for Opioid‐Induced Constipation

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Aims of this consensus panel were to determine (1) an optimal symptom‐based method for assessing opioid‐induced constipation in clinical practice and (2) a threshold of symptom severity to prompt consideration of prescription therapy.

          Methods

          A multidisciplinary panel of 10 experts with extensive knowledge/experience with opioid‐associated adverse events convened to discuss the literature on assessment methods used for opioid‐induced constipation and reach consensus on each objective using the nominal group technique.

          Results

          Five validated assessment tools were evaluated: the Patient Assessment of Constipation–Symptoms (PAC‐SYM), Patient Assessment of Constipation–Quality of Life (PAC‐QOL), Stool Symptom Screener (SSS), Bowel Function Index (BFI), and Bowel Function Diary (BF‐Diary). The 3‐item BFI and 4‐item SSS, both clinician administered, are the shortest tools. In published trials, the BFI and 12‐item PAC‐SYM are most commonly used. The 11‐item BF‐Diary is highly relevant in opioid‐induced constipation and was developed and validated in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration guidelines. However, the panel believes that the complex scoring for this tool and the SSS, PAC‐SYM, and 28‐item PAC‐QOL may be unfeasible for clinical practice. The BFI is psychometrically validated and responsive to changes in symptom severity; scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater severity and scores >28.8 points indicating constipation.

          Conclusions

          The BFI is a simple assessment tool with a validated threshold of clinically significant constipation. Prescription treatments for opioid‐induced constipation should be considered for patients who have a BFI score of ≥30 points and an inadequate response to first‐line interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Clinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain.

          Use of chronic opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain has increased substantially. The American Pain Society and the American Academy of Pain Medicine commissioned a systematic review of the evidence on chronic opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain and convened a multidisciplinary expert panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations. Although evidence is limited, the expert panel concluded that chronic opioid therapy can be an effective therapy for carefully selected and monitored patients with chronic noncancer pain. However, opioids are also associated with potentially serious harms, including opioid-related adverse effects and outcomes related to the abuse potential of opioids. The recommendations presented in this document provide guidance on patient selection and risk stratification; informed consent and opioid management plans; initiation and titration of chronic opioid therapy; use of methadone; monitoring of patients on chronic opioid therapy; dose escalations, high-dose opioid therapy, opioid rotation, and indications for discontinuation of therapy; prevention and management of opioid-related adverse effects; driving and work safety; identifying a medical home and when to obtain consultation; management of breakthrough pain; chronic opioid therapy in pregnancy; and opioid-related policies. Safe and effective chronic opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain requires clinical skills and knowledge in both the principles of opioid prescribing and on the assessment and management of risks associated with opioid abuse, addiction, and diversion. Although evidence is limited in many areas related to use of opioids for chronic noncancer pain, this guideline provides recommendations developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel after a systematic review of the evidence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of cancer pain: evidence-based recommendations from the EAPC.

            Here we provide the updated version of the guidelines of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) on the use of opioids for the treatment of cancer pain. The update was undertaken by the European Palliative Care Research Collaborative. Previous EAPC guidelines were reviewed and compared with other currently available guidelines, and consensus recommendations were created by formal international expert panel. The content of the guidelines was defined according to several topics, each of which was assigned to collaborators who developed systematic literature reviews with a common methodology. The recommendations were developed by a writing committee that combined the evidence derived from the systematic reviews with the panellists' evaluations in a co-authored process, and were endorsed by the EAPC Board of Directors. The guidelines are presented as a list of 16 evidence-based recommendations developed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice?

              Qualitative methods are increasingly recognized as valuable, yet practitioners face difficult decisions in their choice of method and the process of analysis. The nominal group technique combines quantitative and qualitative data collection in a group setting, and avoids problems of group dynamics associated with other group methods such as brainstorming, Delphi and focus groups. Idea generation and problem solving are combined in a structured group process, which encourages and enhances the participation of group members. The stages involved in conducting a nominal group are described, and practical problems of its use in a health care setting are discussed with reference to a study of the priorities of care of diabetic patients, carers and health professionals. Some potential applications of the technique in audit and exploratory research are also outlined.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pain Med
                Pain Med
                10.1111/(ISSN)1526-4637
                PME
                Pain Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Academy of Pain Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1526-2375
                1526-4637
                19 November 2015
                December 2015
                : 16
                : 12 ( doiID: 10.1111/pme.v16.12 )
                : 2324-2337
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]The American Academy of Pain Medicine Foundation and Comprehensive Pain Center, Albany Medical Center Albany New YorkUSA
                [ 2 ]The Pain Center of Fairfield Fairfield ConnecticutUSA
                [ 3 ] Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester MinnesotaUSA
                [ 4 ] Supportive and Palliative CareRoyal Surrey County Hospital and St. Luke's Cancer Centre SurreyUK
                [ 5 ] Remitigate, LLC, and Department of PharmacyStratton Veterans Affairs Medical Center Albany New YorkUSA
                [ 6 ] Department of GeriatricsPhiladelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine Philadelphia PennsylvaniaUSA
                [ 7 ] Pain Management and Palliative CareEnglewood Hospital and Medical Center Englewood New JerseyUSA
                [ 8 ] Division of GastroenterologyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston MassachusettsUSA
                [ 9 ] Pain and Headache CenterSwedish Medical Center Seattle WashingtonUSA
                [ 10 ] Scientific AffairsPRA Health Sciences Salt Lake City UtahUSA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Reprint requests to: Lynn R. Webster, MD, 3838 South 700 East, Suite 202, Salt Lake City, UT 84106, USA. Tel: 801‐892‐5140, Fax: 801‐269‐9427; E‐mail: lrwebstermd@ 123456gmail.com .
                Article
                PME12937
                10.1111/pme.12937
                4738423
                26582720
                4bdd9f4c-5a2f-4ac5-9e21-bdfcc2824310
                © 2015 The Authors Pain Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Pain Medicine

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Categories
                Opioids, Substance Abuse & Addictions Section
                OPIOIDS, SUBSTANCE ABUSE & ADDICTIONS SECTION
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                pme12937
                December 2015
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:4.7.5 mode:remove_FC converted:28.01.2016

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                chronic pain,bowel function index,pamoras,methylnaltrexone,naloxegol,lubiprostone

                Comments

                Comment on this article