20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bridging the Semantic Gap between RDF and SPARQL using Completeness Statements [Extended Version]

      Preprint
      , ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RDF data is often treated as incomplete, following the Open-World Assumption. On the other hand, SPARQL, the standard query language over RDF, usually follows the Closed-World Assumption, assuming RDF data to be complete. This gives rise to a semantic gap between RDF and SPARQL. In this paper, we address how to close the semantic gap between RDF and SPARQL in terms of certain answers and possible answers using completeness statements.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book Chapter: not found

          Completeness Statements about RDF Data Sources and Their Use for Query Answering

            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            2014-08-27
            2014-09-03
            Article
            1408.6395
            4bde01ee-10f8-452a-8d8f-bf3be207bc64

            http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

            History
            Custom metadata
            This paper is an extended version with proofs of a poster paper at ISWC 2014
            cs.DB

            Databases
            Databases

            Comments

            Comment on this article