1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy and safety of antifibrinolytic agents in spinal surgery: a network meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Significant blood loss is still one of the most frequent complications in spinal surgery, which often necessitates blood transfusion. Massive perioperative blood loss and blood transfusion can create additional risks. Aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) are antifibrinolytics currently offered as prophylactic agents to reduce surgery-associated blood loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aprotinin, EACA, and low/high doses of TXA in spinal surgery, and assess the use of which agent is the most optimal intervention using the network meta-analysis (NMA) method.

          Methods:

          Five electronic databases were searched, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Embase, and Web of Science, from the inception to March 1, 2018. Trials that were randomized and compared results between TXA, EACA, and placebo were identified. The NMA was conducted with software R 3.3.2 and STATA 14.0.

          Results:

          Thirty randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were analyzed. Aprotinin (standardized mean difference [SMD]=−0.65, 95% credibility intervals [CrI;−1.25, −0.06]), low-dose TXA (SMD = −0.58, 95% CrI [−0.92, −0.25]), and high-dose TXA (SMD = −0.70, 95% CrI [−1.04, −0.36]) were more effective than the respective placebos in reducing intraoperative blood loss. Low-dose TXA (SMD = −1.90, 95% CrI [−3.32, −0.48]) and high-dose TXA (SMD = −2.31, 95% CrI [−3.75, −0.87]) had less postoperative blood loss. Low-dose TXA (SMD = −1.07, 95% CrI [−1.82, −0.31]) and high-dose TXA (SMD = −1.07, 95% CrI [−1.82, −0.31]) significantly reduced total blood loss. However, only high-dose TXA (SMD = −2.07, 95% CrI [−3.26, −0.87]) was more effective in reducing the amount of transfusion, and was significantly superior to low-dose TXA in this regard (SMD = −1.67, 95% CrI [−3.20, −0.13]). Furthermore, aprotinin (odds ratio [OR] = 0.16, 95% CrI [0.05, 0.54]), EACA (OR = 0.46, 95% CrI [0.22, 0.97]) and high dose of TXA (OR = 0.34, 95% CrI [0.19, 0.58]) had a significant reduction in transfusion rates. Antifibrinolytics did not show a significantly increased risk of postoperative thrombosis. Results of ranking probabilities indicated that high-dose TXA had the greatest efficacy and a relatively high safety level.

          Conclusions:

          The antifibrinolytic agents are able to reduce perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirement during spine surgery. And the high-dose TXA administration might be used as the optimal treatment to reduce blood loss and transfusion.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Tranexamic acid reduces intraoperative blood loss in pediatric patients undergoing scoliosis surgery.

          Excessive bleeding often occurs during pediatric scoliosis surgery and is attributed to numerous factors, including accelerated fibrinolysis. The authors hypothesized that administration of tranexamic acid would reduce bleeding and transfusion requirements during scoliosis surgery. Forty-four patients scheduled to undergo elective spinal fusion were randomly assigned to receive either 100 mg/kg tranexamic acid before incision followed by an infusion of 10 mg . kg . h during surgery (tranexamic acid group) or 0.9% saline (placebo group). General anesthesia was administered according to a standard protocol. Blood loss, transfusion requirements, coagulation parameters, and complications were assessed. In the tranexamic acid group, blood loss was reduced by 41% compared with placebo (1,230 +/- 535 vs. 2,085 +/- 1,188 ml; P < 0.01). The amount of blood transfused did not differ between groups (615 +/- 460 vs. 940 +/- 718 ml; P = 0.08). Administration of tranexamic acid was a multivariate predictor of blood loss, as was American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and preoperative platelet count. No apparent adverse drug effects occurred in any patient. Intraoperative administration of tranexamic acid significantly reduces blood loss during spinal surgery in children with scoliosis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy and safety of prophylactic large dose of tranexamic acid in spine surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

            This is a double blind randomized placebo controlled study, after obtaining approval of ethics committee in the hospital and informed written consent, 64 patients were randomized equally into 2 groups (tranexamic acid (TA) and placebo). To evaluate efficacy and safety of large doses of TA on blood loss during spinal operations. Blood loss associated with spinal operations is a common potential cause of morbidity and often requires blood transfusion which subject patients to the known risks of blood transfusion including transmission of diseases. TA is used routinely to reduce bleeding in cardiac, orthopaedic, and hepatic surgery, however, its use in neurosurgery is uncommon and only few studies reported the use of antifibrinolytic drugs in spine surgery. Sixty-four consecutive patients undergoing spinal surgery with expected significant blood loss at King Khalid University Hospital between June 2005 and December 2006 were randomly assigned to 2 groups, TA and placebo. Shortly after the induction of anesthesia, patients received either TA or placebo as a loading dose of 2 g (for adults) or 30 mg/kg (for children), followed immediately by continuous infusion of 100 mg/h (for adults) or 1 mg/kg/h (for children) during surgery and for 5 hours after the operation. Outcome measures included total (i.e., intraoperative and postoperative) blood loss, amount of blood transfusion, as well as postoperative hemoglobin, and hematocrite levels. The data were analyzed by means of Statistical Package for the Social Science Version 12.0. The results were presented as mean +/- SD. Independent Student t test was used to compare the 2 groups and differences were considered significant if the P-value was <0.05. There were 39 males and 25 females, ranging in age from 4 to 86 years with a mean of 51 and median of 56 years. Eighteen patients had multilevel anterior cervical discectomies with or without internal fixation, 22 patients had decompressive surgery (12 laminectomies and 10 intersegmental decompressions) for multiseg- ment spinal stenosis, 15 patients had laminectomy with posterior spinal fixation, and remaining 9 patients had laminectomy and excision of spinal tumor. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences between the 2 study groups with regard to age, sex, weight, preoperative hemoglobin, and hematocrite levels, type of surgery, as well as operative time. In contrast, patients who received TA had 49% reduction of blood loss (P < 0.007) and required 80% less blood transfusion (P < 0.008) than patients who received placebo. The hospital stay was shorter in the TA group, but it did not achieve statistical significance. There were no complications related to the use of large doses of TA in this study. Prophylactic use of large doses of TA provides an effective, safe, and cheap method for reducing blood loss during and after spinal operations. Hence, TAmay help in reducing not only transfusion related complications but also operative expenses. Considering the limited number of patients in this study, our results need, however, to be validated on a larger number of patients, probably in a multicenter study.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tranexamic Acid reduces perioperative blood loss in adult patients having spinal fusion surgery.

              Spinal reconstructive surgery in adults can be associated with significant blood loss, often requiring allogeneic blood transfusion. The objective of this randomized, prospective, double-blind, multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) in reducing perioperative blood loss and transfusion in adult patients having elective posterior thoracic/lumbar instrumented spinal fusion surgery. One hundred fifty-one adult patients were randomized to receive either a bolus of 10 mg/kg IV of TXA after induction followed by a maintenance infusion of 1 mg/kg/hr of TXA, or an equivalent volume of placebo (normal saline). The primary outcome was the total perioperative estimated and calculated blood loss intraoperatively and 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were incidence of allogeneic blood exposure, and duration of hospital stay. Four patients were withdrawn for identifiable surgical bleeding, therefore 147 patients were included in the analysis. The total estimated and calculated perioperative blood loss was approximately 25% and 30% lower in patients given TXA versus placebo (1592 +/- 1315 mL vs 2138 +/- 1607 mL, P = 0.026; 3079 +/- 2558 vs 4363 +/- 3030, P = 0.017), respectively. There was no difference in the amounts of blood products transfused, and length of stay between the two groups. TXA, surgical duration, and number of vertebrae fused were independent factors related to perioperative blood loss. Predictors for the need for allogeneic red blood cell transfusion were ASA classification, surgical duration and number of levels fused. TXA significantly reduced the estimated and calculated total amount of perioperative blood loss in adult patients having elective posterior thoracic/lumbar instrumented spinal fusion surgery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Chin Med J (Engl)
                Chin. Med. J
                CM9
                Chinese Medical Journal
                Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications
                0366-6999
                2542-5641
                5 March 2019
                25 February 2019
                : 132
                : 5
                : 577-588
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
                [2 ]Department of Urodynamic Center and Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China
                [3 ]Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Dr. Yan Zeng, Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, No 49. North Garden Street, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100191, China E-Mail: zyanby@ 123456gamil.com
                Article
                CMJ-2018-477
                10.1097/CM9.0000000000000108
                6416000
                30807356
                4bfd8ed5-35a6-4c32-99f0-5c0507f1ce83
                Copyright © 2019 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

                History
                : 26 December 2018
                Categories
                Meta Analysis
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                antifibrinolytics,spine surgery,blood loss,transfusion,network meta-analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article