16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Misconceptions about Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy Expenditure

      research-article
      1 ,
      Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The measurement of gas exchange has played an invaluable role in metabolic interpretation. The uptake of 1 liter of oxygen is often converted into an energy expenditure estimate of 21.1 kilojoules (e.g., 1 L O 2 = 21.1 kJ or ~5 kcal). This article demonstrates both the importance of such a conversion and the potential for misinterpretation. Oxygen uptake during heavy and severe exercise will also be discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Muscular Exercise, Lactic Acid, and the Supply and Utilization of Oxygen

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Metabolic bases of excess post-exercise oxygen consumption: a review.

            The classical "oxygen debt" hypothesis formulated by Hill and associates in the 1920s was an attempt to link the metabolism of lactic acid with the O2 consumption in excess of resting that occurs after exercise. The O2 debt was hypothesized to represent the oxidation of a minor fraction (1/5) of the lactate formed during exercise, to provide the energy to reconvert the remainder (4/5) of the lactate to glycogen during recovery. In 1933 Margaria et al. modified this hypothesis by distinguishing between initial, fast ("alactacid"), and second, slow ("lactacid"), O2-debt curve components. They hypothesized that the fast phase of the post-exercise O2 consumption curve was due to the restoration of phosphagen (ATP + CP). It is now probable that the original lactic acid explanation of the O2 debt was too simplistic. Numerous studies on several species have provided evidence demonstrating a dissociation between the kinetics of lactate removal and the slow component of the post-exercise VO2. The metabolism of lactate, a readily oxidizable substrate, following exercise appears to be directed primarily toward energy production in mitochondria. The elevated concentration of lactate present at the end of exercise may be viewed as a "reservoir of carbon," which may serve as a source of oxidative ATP production or as a source of carbon skeletons for the synthesis of glucose, glycogen, amino acids, and TCA cycle intermediates. The metabolic basis of the elevated post-exercise VO2 may be understood in terms of those factors which directly or indirectly influence mitochondrial O2 consumption. Included among these factors are catecholamines, thyroxine, glucocorticoids, fatty acids, calcium ions, and temperature. Of these, elevated temperature is perhaps the most important. As no complete explanation of the post-exercise metabolism exists, it is recommended that the term "O2 debt" be used to describe a set of phenomena during recovery from exercise. The terms "alactacid debt" and "lactacid debt," which suggest a mechanism, are inappropriate. Use of alternative terms, e.g., "excess post-exercise oxygen consumption" (EPOC) and "recovery O2," will avoid implication of causality in describing the elevation in metabolic rate above resting levels after exercise.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              The Fire of Life: An Introduction to Animal Energetics

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Int Soc Sports Nutr
                Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
                BioMed Central
                1550-2783
                2005
                9 December 2005
                : 2
                : 2
                : 32-37
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Sports Medicine Department, University of Southern Maine, Gorham, ME
                Article
                1550-2783-2-2-32
                10.1186/1550-2783-2-2-32
                2129144
                18500953
                4c1db398-86c2-47bc-a13c-a57a0b8bb261
                Copyright © 2005 A National Library of Congress Indexed Journal
                History
                : 10 October 2005
                : 2 November 2005
                Categories
                Commentary

                Sports medicine
                Sports medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article