29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exploratory Analysis of TP53 Mutations in Circulating Tumour DNA as Biomarkers of Treatment Response for Patients with Relapsed High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) carrying tumour-specific sequence alterations may provide a minimally invasive means to dynamically assess tumour burden and response to treatment in cancer patients. Somatic TP53 mutations are a defining feature of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). We tested whether these mutations could be used as personalised markers to monitor tumour burden and early changes as a predictor of response and time to progression (TTP).

          Methods and Findings

          We performed a retrospective analysis of serial plasma samples collected during routine clinical visits from 40 patients with HGSOC undergoing heterogeneous standard of care treatment. Patient-specific TP53 assays were developed for 31 unique mutations identified in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour DNA from these patients. These assays were used to quantify ctDNA in 318 plasma samples using microfluidic digital PCR. The TP53 mutant allele fraction (TP53MAF) was compared to serum CA-125, the current gold-standard response marker for HGSOC in blood, as well as to disease volume on computed tomography scans by volumetric analysis. Changes after one cycle of treatment were compared with TTP.

          The median TP53MAF prior to treatment in 51 relapsed treatment courses was 8% (interquartile range [IQR] 1.2%–22%) compared to 0.7% (IQR 0.3%–2.0%) for seven untreated newly diagnosed stage IIIC/IV patients. TP53MAF correlated with volumetric measurements (Pearson r = 0.59, p < 0.001), and this correlation improved when patients with ascites were excluded ( r = 0.82). The ratio of TP53MAF to volume of disease was higher in relapsed patients (0.04% per cm 3) than in untreated patients (0.0008% per cm 3, p = 0.004). In nearly all relapsed patients with disease volume > 32 cm 3, ctDNA was detected at ≥20 amplifiable copies per millilitre of plasma. In 49 treatment courses for relapsed disease, pre-treatment TP53MAF concentration, but not CA-125, was associated with TTP. Response to chemotherapy was seen earlier with ctDNA, with a median time to nadir of 37 d (IQR 28–54) compared with a median time to nadir of 84 d (IQR 42–116) for CA-125. In 32 relapsed treatment courses evaluable for response after one cycle of chemotherapy, a decrease in TP53MAF of >60% was an independent predictor of TTP in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.07–0.67, p = 0.008). Conversely, a decrease in TP53MAF of ≤60% was associated with poor response and identified cases with TTP < 6 mo with 71% sensitivity (95% CI 42%–92%) and 88% specificity (95% CI 64%–99%). Specificity was improved when patients with recent drainage of ascites were excluded. Ascites drainage led to a reduction of TP53MAF concentration. The limitations of this study include retrospective design, small sample size, and heterogeneity of treatment within the cohort.

          Conclusions

          In this retrospective study, we demonstrated that ctDNA is correlated with volume of disease at the start of treatment in women with HGSOC and that a decrease of ≤60% in TP53MAF after one cycle of chemotherapy was associated with shorter TTP. These results provide evidence that ctDNA has the potential to be a highly specific early molecular response marker in HGSOC and warrants further investigation in larger cohorts receiving uniform treatment.

          Abstract

          James Brenton and colleagues reveal tumour burden and prognosis correlations from circulating DNA analysis in high grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

          Author Summary

          Why Was This Study Done?
          • The standard clinical blood test for measuring response in women receiving chemotherapy for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the serum protein cancer antigen 125 (CA-125).

          • CA-125 is sensitive but it lacks specificity for detection of ovarian cancer, and in response to chemotherapy, CA-125 level does not change rapidly enough to suggest change in treatment after one or two cycles if chemotherapy treatment is ineffective.

          • Better tumour markers are required, and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a promising candidate.

          • ctDNA is cell-free DNA derived from tumour cells that can be detected in the bloodstream; ctDNA can be used as a highly specific marker because it carries mutations unique to the cancer.

          What Did the Researchers Do and Find?
          • HGSOC is an ideal cancer to test ctDNA as a biomarker because 99% of patients have a mutation in the TP53 gene.

          • We designed patient-specific TP53 assays for a retrospective study of 40 patients with HGSOC, and these were used to quantify the amount of ctDNA in 318 plasma samples collected before, during, and after chemotherapy.

          • We asked if ctDNA level was correlated with the amount of disease present before chemotherapy treatment measured using 3-D volume reconstruction from CT images taken as part of routine care.

          • We also asked if the decrease in TP53 ctDNA after one cycle of chemotherapy treatment could predict which patients would have progression of their cancer within six months.

          • ctDNA level, but not CA-125 level, was strongly correlated with the total volume of disease.

          • Patients whose ctDNA level exhibited a decrease of >60% after one cycle of chemotherapy had a significantly longer time to progression than those whose ctDNA level decreased by 60% or less.

          What Do These Findings Mean?
          • TP53 ctDNA has the potential to be a clinically useful blood test to assess prognosis and response to treatment in women with HGSOC.

          • The response findings from this retrospective study should be confirmed in larger, prospective studies with uniform treatment. If these findings are confirmed, TP53 ctDNA could be used in HGSOC clinical trials and routine practice to identify earlier whether treatment is effective.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Circulating tumor DNA as an early marker of therapeutic response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

          Early indicators of treatment response in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) could conceivably be used to optimize treatment. We explored early changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels as a marker of therapeutic efficacy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Circulating tumor cells and response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: SWOG S0500.

            Increased circulating tumor cells (CTCs; five or more CTCs per 7.5 mL of whole blood) are associated with poor prognosis in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A randomized trial of patients with persistent increase in CTCs tested whether changing chemotherapy after one cycle of first-line chemotherapy would improve the primary outcome of overall survival (OS). Patients with MBC who did not have increased CTCs at baseline remained on initial therapy until progression (arm A). Patients with initially increased CTCs that decreased after 21 days of therapy remained on initial therapy (arm B). Patients with persistently increased CTCs after 21 days of therapy were randomly assigned to continue initial therapy (arm C1) or change to an alternative chemotherapy (arm C2). Of 595 eligible and evaluable patients, 276 (46%) did not have increased CTCs (arm A). Of those with initially increased CTCs, 31 (10%) were not retested, 165 were assigned to arm B, and 123 were randomly assigned to arm C1 or C2. No difference in median OS was observed between arm C1 and C2 (10.7 and 12.5 months, respectively; P = .98). CTCs were strongly prognostic. Median OS for arms A, B, and C (C1 and C2 combined) were 35 months, 23 months, and 13 months, respectively (P < .001). This study confirms the prognostic significance of CTCs in patients with MBC receiving first-line chemotherapy. For patients with persistently increased CTCs after 21 days of first-line chemotherapy, early switching to an alternate cytotoxic therapy was not effective in prolonging OS. For this population, there is a need for more effective treatment than standard chemotherapy. © 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry laboratory medicine practice guidelines for use of tumor markers in testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian cancers.

              Updated National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for the use of tumor markers in the clinic have been developed. Published reports relevant to use of tumor markers for 5 cancer sites--testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian--were critically reviewed. For testicular cancer, alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase are recommended for diagnosis/case finding, staging, prognosis determination, recurrence detection, and therapy monitoring. alpha-Fetoprotein is also recommended for differential diagnosis of nonseminomatous and seminomatous germ cell tumors. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is not recommended for prostate cancer screening, but may be used for detecting disease recurrence and monitoring therapy. Free PSA measurement data are useful for distinguishing malignant from benign prostatic disease when total PSA is <10 microg/L. In colorectal cancer, carcinoembryonic antigen is recommended (with some caveats) for prognosis determination, postoperative surveillance, and therapy monitoring in advanced disease. Fecal occult blood testing may be used for screening asymptomatic adults 50 years or older. For breast cancer, estrogen and progesterone receptors are mandatory for predicting response to hormone therapy, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 measurement is mandatory for predicting response to trastuzumab, and urokinase plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 may be used for determining prognosis in lymph node-negative patients. CA15-3/BR27-29 or carcinoembryonic antigen may be used for therapy monitoring in advanced disease. CA125 is recommended (with transvaginal ultrasound) for early detection of ovarian cancer in women at high risk for this disease. CA125 is also recommended for differential diagnosis of suspicious pelvic masses in postmenopausal women, as well as for detection of recurrence, monitoring of therapy, and determination of prognosis in women with ovarian cancer. Implementation of these recommendations should encourage optimal use of tumor markers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Med
                PLoS Med
                plos
                plosmed
                PLoS Medicine
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1549-1277
                1549-1676
                20 December 2016
                December 2016
                : 13
                : 12
                : e1002198
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Department of Oncology, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [3 ]NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [4 ]Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [5 ]Cancer Research UK Major Centre–Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                Washington University School of Medicine, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                We have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: DG, NR and JDB are co-founders, shareholders and officers/consultants of Inivata Ltd, a cancer genomics company that commercialises ctDNA analysis.

                • Conceptualization: CAP DG NR JDB.

                • Data curation: CAP DG AMP KS KH NR JDB.

                • Formal analysis: CAP DG AMP HA SF PM ES WQ NR JDB.

                • Funding acquisition: NR JDB.

                • Investigation: CAP DG AMP HB CH HA SF PM ES KS KH MJ-L HME IG.

                • Methodology: CAP DG NR JDB.

                • Project administration: DG AMP HB CH KS.

                • Resources: CAP HB CH IG HME JDB.

                • Software: NR.

                • Supervision: NR JDB.

                • Validation: CAP DG WQ NR JDB.

                • Visualization: CAP DG NR JDB.

                • Writing – original draft: CAP DG NR JDB.

                • Writing – review & editing: CAP DG AMP HB CH HA SF PM ES KS KH IG MJ-L HME WQ NR JDB.

                [¤]

                Current address: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2240-1740
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-5462
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4238-3471
                Article
                PMEDICINE-D-16-02273
                10.1371/journal.pmed.1002198
                5172526
                27997533
                4c5070b4-fb5b-437b-af07-52e2a59a33a2
                © 2016 Parkinson et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 16 July 2016
                : 9 November 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 4, Pages: 25
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289, Cancer Research UK;
                Award ID: A15601
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289, Cancer Research UK;
                Award ID: A11906
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289, Cancer Research UK;
                Award ID: A20240
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289, Cancer Research UK;
                Award ID: A18072
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272, National Institute for Health Research;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000691, Academy of Medical Sciences;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440, Wellcome Trust;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000274, British Heart Foundation;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Arthritis Research UK (GB)
                Award Recipient :
                This work was supported by Cancer Research UK ( http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/) Grant numbers: A15601 (JDB), A11906 (NR), A20240 (NR), A18072 (JDB). JDB was supported by the National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. CAP was supported in part by the Academy of Medical Sciences, the Wellcome Trust, British Heart Foundation and Arthritis Research UK. CAP, DG, AMP, HB, CH, HA, SF, PM, KH, IG, MJL, HME, WQ, NR and JDB are affiliated with Cancer Research UK but the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and life sciences
                Biochemistry
                Biomarkers
                Circulating tumor DNA
                Medicine and health sciences
                Diagnostic medicine
                Cancer detection and diagnosis
                Circulating tumor DNA
                Medicine and health sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer detection and diagnosis
                Circulating tumor DNA
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer Treatment
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmaceutics
                Drug Therapy
                Chemotherapy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer Treatment
                Cancer Chemotherapy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmaceutics
                Drug Therapy
                Chemotherapy
                Cancer Chemotherapy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Clinical Medicine
                Clinical Oncology
                Cancer Chemotherapy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Clinical Oncology
                Cancer Chemotherapy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Gastroenterology and Hepatology
                Ascites
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Imaging Techniques
                Neuroimaging
                Computed Axial Tomography
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Neuroimaging
                Computed Axial Tomography
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Diagnostic Radiology
                Tomography
                Computed Axial Tomography
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Imaging Techniques
                Diagnostic Radiology
                Tomography
                Computed Axial Tomography
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Radiology and Imaging
                Diagnostic Radiology
                Tomography
                Computed Axial Tomography
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Molecular Biology
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Artificial Gene Amplification and Extension
                Polymerase Chain Reaction
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Artificial Gene Amplification and Extension
                Polymerase Chain Reaction
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Mutation
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article