2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What Affects Segmental Lordosis of the Surgical Site after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          This study was undertaken to identify factors that affect segmental lordosis (SL) after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) by comparing patients whose postoperative SL increased with those whose decreased.

          Materials and Methods

          Fifty-five patients underwent MIS-TLIF at our institute from January 2018 to September 2019. Demographic, pre- and postoperative radiologic, and cage-related factors were included. Statistical analyses were designed to compare patients whose SL increased with decreased after surgery.

          Results

          After surgery, SL increased in 34 patients (group I) and decreased in 21 patients (group D). The index level, disc lordosis, SL, lumbar lordosis, proximal lordosis (PL), and Y-axis position of the cage (Yc) differed significantly between groups I and D. The cage in group I was more anterior than that in group D (Yc: 55.84% vs. 51.24%). Multivariate analysis showed that SL decreased more significantly after MIS-TLIF when the index level was L3/4 rather than L4/5 [odds ratio (OR): 0.46, p=0.019], as preoperative SL (OR: 0.82, p=0.037) or PL (OR: 0.68, p=0.028) increased, and as the cage became more posterior (OR: 1.10, p=0.032).

          Conclusion

          Changes in SL after MIS-TLIF appear to be associated with preoperative SL and PL, index level, and Yc. An index level at L4/5 instead of L3/4, smaller preoperative SL or PL, and an anterior position of the cage are likely to result in increased SL after MIS-TLIF.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Sagittal balance of the spine

          The static sagittal balance of the normal spine is a physiological alignment of the spine in the most efficient manner by the muscular forces. During gait, this balance is constantly thwarted by single-foot support. This analysis involves the study of parameters which are now well defined. The pelvic incidence is constant, and the sacral slope and the pelvic tilt are positional. The cervical parameters are the upper (O-C2) and lower cervical curvatures (C2-C7), the C7 slope, the spino-cranial angle and the vertical cervical offset. At the thoracic and lumbar level, they are, respectively, kyphosis and lordosis. The OD-HA (odontoid hip axis) angle is the most efficient parameter to analyse the global balance. The average values of these parameters are reported with the new 3D measurements by Le Huec et al. The relationship between these different parameters was analysed, and Roussouly proposed his classification of the different spine shape. Ageing makes it possible to show compensation mechanisms at three levels: spinal, pelvic and lower limbs. Understanding these different data allows for better planning of the surgical management of the patients. Global evaluation of the entire spine and the measurement of the aforementioned parameters allow to determine the extent of the correction to be performed during surgery. Taking these parameters into account also enables us to understand the complications involved in this type of surgery: transitional syndromes or junctional syndromes. Integration of these parameters into the study of gait is an area still under investigation. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material .
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

            Prospective study. Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes of minimally invasive (MIS) versus Open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Open TLIF has been performed for many years with good results. MIS TLIF techniques have recently been introduced with the aim of smaller wounds and faster recovery. From 2004-2006, 29 MIS TLIF were matched paired with 29 Open TLIF. Patient demographics and operative data were collected. Clinical assessment in terms of North American Spine Society, Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form-36, and Visual Analogue scores were performed before surgery, 6 months and 2 years after surgery. Fusion rates based on Bridwell grading were assessed at 2 years. The mean age for MIS and Open procedures were 54.1 and 52.5 years, respectively. There were 24 females and 5 males in both groups. Fluoroscopic time (MIS: 105.5 seconds, Open: 35.2 seconds, P 0.05). MIS TLIF has similar good long-term clinical outcomes and high fusion rates of Open TLIF with the additional benefits of less initial postoperative pain, early rehabilitation, shorter hospitalization, and fewer complications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction.

              Recent advances in spinal instrumentation have brought about a new emphasis on the three-dimensional spinal deformity of scoliosis and especially on the restoration of normal sagittal plane contours. Normal alignment in the coronal and transverse planes is easily defined; however, normal sagittal plane alignment is not so simple. This retrospective study was undertaken to increase the understanding of the normal alignment of the spine in the sagittal plane, with a special emphasis on the thoracolumbar junction. Measurements were made from the lateral radiographs of 102 subjects with clinically and radiographically normal spines. Cobb measurements of the thoracic kyphosis (T3-T12), the thoracolumbar junction (T10-T12 and T12-L2), and the lumbar lordosis (L1-L5) were determined. The spices of the thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis also were determined. Using a computerized digitalizing table, the segmental angulation was determined at each level from T1-2 to L5-S1. In conclusion, there is a wide range of normal sagittal alignment of the thoracic and lumbar spines. When using composite measurements of the combined frontal and sagittal plane deformity of scoliosis, this wide range of sagittal variance should be taken into consideration. Using norms established here for segmental alignment, areas of hypokyphosis and hypolordosis commonly seen in scoliosis can be more objectively evaluated. The thoracolumbar junction is for all practical purposes straight; lumbar lordosis usually starts at L1-2 and gradually increases at each level caudally to the sacrum.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Yonsei Med J
                Yonsei Med J
                YMJ
                Yonsei Medical Journal
                Yonsei University College of Medicine
                0513-5796
                1976-2437
                July 2022
                14 June 2022
                : 63
                : 7
                : 665-674
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea.
                [2 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, Korea.
                [3 ]Department of Neurosurgery, The Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Jeong-Yoon Park, MD, PhD, Department of Neurosurgery, The Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06273, Korea. Tel: 82-2-2019-3394, Fax: 82-2-3461-9229, spinepjy@ 123456yuhs.ac
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9772-9938
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9446-8656
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3728-7784
                Article
                10.3349/ymj.2022.63.7.665
                9226838
                35748078
                4c57b1df-ba05-4df1-8ee9-1caf0462da48
                © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2022

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 February 2022
                : 01 April 2022
                : 20 April 2022
                Categories
                Original Article
                Orthopedics & Spine

                Medicine
                minimally invasive,transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,lumbar lordosis,cage,outcome,spine surgery,segmental lordosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article