3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Knowledge, Experience, and Concerns Regarding Bed Bugs Among Emergency Medical Service Providers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Bed bugs are commonly encountered by emergency medical service (EMS) providers. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency with which EMS providers encountered bed bugs, assess their knowledge about bed bugs, and analyze the actions they take after finding bed bugs.

          Methods

          We anonymously surveyed 407 EMS providers from 180 EMS agencies in northeast Ohio between September 1, 2018, through March 31, 2019.

          Results

          Among the providers surveyed, 21% (n = 84) of the EMS providers reported seeing bed bugs at least monthly, and 6% (n = 24) reported seeing bed bugs at least weekly. Being younger, male, and working in an urban environment (vs. rural) were associated with EMS providers reporting more frequent bed bug encounters (p: ≤.05). The mean level of concern for encountering bed bugs among EMS providers was 3.54 (SD: 1.15; scale: 1 = no concern, 5 = very concerned). Among the EMS providers who reported seeing bed bugs at least monthly, 30% took the affected EMS stretcher out of service when they encounter a bed bug, 43% took the EMS rig out of service, 83% cleaned the EMS stretcher with a disinfectant, and 88% notified the ED that their patient has bed bugs. EMS providers scored poorly (mean: 69% correct responses) in a seven-question assessment of basic bed bug biology and public health.

          Conclusion

          Based on our findings, we concluded that EMS knowledge and behavior related to bed bugs are suboptimal.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Bed bugs: clinical relevance and control options.

          Since the late 1990s, bed bugs of the species Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus have undergone a worldwide resurgence. These bed bugs are blood-sucking insects that readily bite humans. Cutaneous reactions may occur and can start out as small macular lesions that can develop into distinctive wheals of around 5 cm in diameter, which are accompanied by intense itching. Occasionally, bullous eruptions may result. If bed bugs are numerous, the patient can present with widespread urticaria or eythematous rashes. Often, bites occur in lines along the limbs. Over 40 pathogens have been detected in bed bugs, but there is no definitive evidence that they transmit any disease-causing organisms to humans. Anemia may result when bed bugs are numerous, and their allergens can trigger asthmatic reactions. The misuse of chemicals and other technologies for controlling bed bugs has the potential to have a deleterious impact on human health, while the insect itself can be the cause of significant psychological trauma. The control of bed bugs is challenging and should encompass a multidisciplinary approach utilizing nonchemical means of control and the judicious use of insecticides. For accommodation providers, risk management procedures should be implemented to reduce the potential of bed bug infestations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bed bugs (Cimex lectularius) and clinical consequences of their bites.

            Bed bug (Cimex lectularius) infestations are rapidly increasing worldwide. Health consequences include nuisance biting and cutaneous and systemic reactions. The potential for bed bugs to serve as disease vectors and optimal methods for bed bug pest control and eradication are unclear. To present current knowledge of the health and medical effects of bed bugs and to explore key issues in pest control and eradication efforts. A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (1960-October 2008) for articles using the keywords bed bugs, Cimex lectularius, humans, parasitology, pathogenicity, and drug effects. For pest control, PubMed and Toxline searches (1960-October 2008) were performed using the keywords bed bugs, Cimex, control, prevention, and eradication. Manual searches of older journals, textbooks, pest control trade journals, and newspapers (1892-October 2008) were also performed. Original accounts or investigations of bed bugs, clinical responses with sufficient detail of cause and effect between the bed bug bite and clinical response, and convincing evidence of substantiated presence of bed bug exposure. For pest control, documentation that an eradication measure quantitatively decreased bed bugs. A trained medical reference librarian assisted with the literature search. Two authors with expertise in the diagnosis, treatment, and eradication of bed bugs reviewed the clinical articles. One author evaluated the pest control articles. Fifty-three articles met inclusion criteria and were summarized. Only 2 clinical trials concerning bed bugs were identified and tested the ability of pest control interventions to eradicate bed bugs. Although transmission of more than 40 human diseases has been attributed to bed bugs, there is little evidence that they are vectors of communicable disease. A variety of clinical reactions to bed bugs have been reported, including cutaneous and rarely systemic reactions. A wide range of empirical treatments, including antibiotics, antihistamines, topical and oral corticosteroids, and epinephrine, have been used for bite reactions with varying results. No evidence-based interventions to eradicate bed bugs or prevent bites were identified. Treatment options for cutaneous and systemic reactions from bed bug bites have not been evaluated in clinical trials and there is no evidence that outcomes differ significantly from those receiving no treatment. Evidence for disease transmission by bed bugs is lacking. Pest control and eradication is challenging due to insecticide resistance, lack of effective products, and health concerns about spraying mattresses with pesticides.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Bedbugs and Infectious Diseases

              Bedbugs are hematophagous arthropods. The discovery of specimens in tombs at Tell al-Armana, Egypt, suggests that these insects have been pestering humans for at least 3550 years [1]. After World War II, bedbugs became uncommon in developed countries due to social and economic progress and insecticide development [2], while infestation in poor countries never decreased [3, 4]. Recently reported outbreaks have indicated bedbug resurgence in many occidental countries [5]. Medical interest in bedbugs (especially Cimex lectularius in temperate zones or Cimex hemipterus in tropical areas and sometimes temperate zones) has increased (Figure 1). Numerous authors have postulated that these species could transmit pathogens to humans. Consensus on their medical impact remains limited to dermatological reactions to their bites [6, 7]. We undertook a literature review, describing their entomological characteristics, epidemiology, and medical impact and focusing on the vectorial behaviors of this insect. Figure 1. Increase in the number of PubMed citations for the search words Cimicidae, Cimex, Afrocimex, or Oeciacus over the past 10 years. The medical community's interest in bedbugs (Cimex lecturarius or Cimex hemipterus) has increased dramatically. ENTOMOLOGY Bedbugs are Hemiptera order insects of the Cimicidae family. Medicine is well acquainted with 2 Hemiptera: Reduviidae, as vectors of Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi), and Cimicidae, as pests [1]. C. lectularius, C. hemipterus, C. columbarius, C. pipistrelli, C. dissimilis, and Oeciacus hirundinis are the main species involved in humans, whereas birds or bats are the primary hosts for C. columbarius, C. pipistrelli, O. hirundinis, C. lectularius, and C. hemipterus. This review focuses on these last 2 species. Adult C. lectularius and C. hemipterus are reddish-brown, flat, wingless ovals (4–7 mm) resembling confetti (Figures 2A and 2B ). The 2 species are distinguishable only by specialists. Both sexes are hematophagous and can live for 12 months without feeding and even 1.5–2 years in colder environments. Figure 2. Physical appearance of bedbugs (Cimex lectularius). Bedbugs are hematophagous arthropods that resemble small, brownish, flat, and oval confetti. A, Bedbug nymph; note the bite unit in front of the head (arrow), which is usually folded under the head as for the adult. B, Adult bedbug. During each Cimicidae mating, sperm are deposited by traumatic insemination, which bypasses the female genital tract. The male's intromittent organ pierces the cuticle via a surface groove, called the ectospermalege (which purportedly evolved to guide the organ and reduce trauma but is a frequently missed target and hence the cuticle is punctured elsewhere) and injects sperm into the mesospermagele, a specific female organ through which the sperm migrate. Males preferentially direct their sexual interest to recently fed females, which undergo ∼5 traumatic inseminations per feeding [8]. High female mortality results from these numerous traumas, but other explanations have also been proposed (eg, microbe introduction by traumatic insemination). As for most female insects, sperm are stored in specific structures called seminal conceptacles. The female reproductive tract is used only for laying fertilized eggs. Each adult female produces 200–500 eggs in her lifetime. Under a constant temperature of 14–27°C, eggs hatch 4–10 days after mating, yielding the nymphs, which are 1–3 mm long, visible to the naked eye, translucent, and lighter in color [8]. Each molt requires a blood meal, which can last 10–20 min, to grow to the next stage every 3–7 days if a host is available. These developmental stages of the bedbug (Figure 3) explain how a previously unknown bedbug presence in a newly infested site achieves exponential multiplication by the end of the first month. Figure 3. Life cycle of the bedbug (Cimex lecturarius or Cimex hemipterus). These evolutionary stages and the reproduction biology of the bedbug explain how, over 1 month, an unknown introduction of several bedbugs into a new site leads to their exponential multiplication and sudden infestation. Bedbugs fear light and are generally active in the dark. They hide in any small dark place, such as bedclothes, mattresses, springs, bed frames, cracks, crevices, and wallpaper. They emit an easily recognized, offensive odor caused by an oily secretion produced by special glands [8, 9]. EPIDEMIOLOGY Beds bugs are cosmopolite insects. Isolated cases, clusters, or epidemics of bedbugs have been reported in most big cities on all continents [2, 10, 11]. Bedbugs have the ability to spread near and far. Local spreading, called “active dispersal,” occurs by walking short distances, such as when they try to reach hosts from their dark resting places. Active dispersal is the main means of room-to-room spreading in communities through ventilation ducts. Bedbugs can also travel longer distances by being transported by humans in clothing, luggage, or furniture; this is called “passive dispersal.” Hence, the rapid turnover of residents in certain locations is a risk factor for bedbug infestation. Furthermore, overcrowding and deprived conditions are factors that facilitate the bedbug burden. Finally, the infestation risk reflects rapid turnover and high human density but not specific geographic areas or climatic conditions [12–14]. Bedbug eradication from an infested site is a challenge: Insecticide resistance has been demonstrated experimentally and is an increasing problem [15]. Successful bedbug elimination relies mainly on good cooperation between the owner of the pest-infested site and the pest manager for site assessment, thorough inspection, identification, and eradication. An “efficient search-and-destroy” operation, as Doggett explained [16], must be imposed, starting by removing all bed linens and washing at a temperature >60°C, then by checking and dismantling all furniture to access all bedbug hiding places, to identify and destroy eggs, nymphs, and adults (Figures 4A–4F) [16]. Alternatively, a dog specifically trained to detect bedbugs’ characteristic odor can do the search [17]. Attractive traps can also be used in highly infested locations [18]. It is always best to vacuum first to reduce the overall bedbug population, but complete success is unlikely without remnant insecticides for residual protection against bedbug survivors. Fumigants, which are too frequently used by nonprofessionals, do not penetrate deeply into bedbug hiding places, fail to provide any residual protection, and can pose an immediate health risk to the user. Aerosolized insecticides against cockroaches, for example, are quick killing agents that can be accurately applied meticulously to specific areas (eg, mattress or cracks and crevices in furniture). The best option is a remnant insecticide, which is spread by a professional in all hiding areas identified during the inspection process. Sometimes, it may be advisable to treat adjoining rooms, even when no bedbugs were found during the inspection [12, 16]. Some methods can minimize the risk of infestation or expansion: regular inspections, hygiene procedures, and general education of the population. Complementary measures include modifying room temperature, destroying nearby bat or bird habitats, eliminating peeling paint and plaster, and caulking cracks and crevices in walls and furniture [16, 19]. MEDICAL IMPACT After identification of bedbug bites, skin and infectious transmissible diseases are the 2 main medical concerns of human contact with the bedbugs [20, 21]. Hosts are usually bitten at night. Because bedbug saliva contains anesthetic compounds, bites are painless and usually not felt until several hours later. Other compounds are also injected: anticoagulant factors (eg, factor-X inhibitor), vasodilatory compounds (such as nitric oxide), and proteolytic enzymes (eg, apyrase), which are all substances that participate in the ensuing local hypersensitivity reactions [6]. The typical skin lesion is a pruritic erythematous maculopapule, 5 mm to 2 cm in diameter, with a central hemorrhagic crust or vesicle at the bite site, similar to arthropod bites. Atypical forms vary from asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic to purpuric, vesicular, and bullous lesions. The bedbug-bite distribution frequently follows a line or curve (Figure 5A and 5B). Lesion numbers range from several to many, depending on habitat-infestation intensity, and are preferentially located in unclothed zones (Figure 5C ). Sometimes, the eruption mimics urticaria (Figure 5D). Exceptional anemia [21] or anaphylactic reactions have been reported. Lesions resolve spontaneously within 2–6 weeks, but permanent postinflammatory hyperpigmentation may ensue [22–25]. Figure 4. Hiding places of begbugs (Cimex lecturarius or Cimex hemipterus). An efficient search-and-destroy operation against bedbugs (A) must start by removing the mattress (B) and box springs (C), then by exploring the floor close to the bed (D) and curtains (E, F) to identify and destroy eggs, nymphs, and adults. Figure 5. Presentation of bedbug (Cimex lecturarius or Cimex hemipterus) bites: forms vary from asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic to purpuric, vesicular, and bullous lesions. The typical skin lesion is a pruritic erythematous maculopapule that is 5 mm to 2 cm in diameter with a central hemorrhagic crust or vesicle at the bite site, similar to other arthropod bites (A). A series of bites in a line is characteristic of bedbug bites (B). Lesion numbers range from a few to numerous, depending on habitat-infestation intensity, and are preferentially located in unclothed zones (C). In some cases, the eruption mimics urticaria (D). Bedbugs have been suspected of transmitting infectious agents; over 40 microorganisms have frequently been considered strong candidates [6, 7]. In contrast to that for mosquitoes or ticks, the literature evidence level for disease transmission by bedbugs is very heterogeneous and sometimes incomplete. Several steps are mandatory to demonstrate the causal relationship between a vector and a disease. The first is vector competence—that is, an attempt must be made to demonstrate by laboratory experiments an arthropod's ability to acquire an infectious agent from another animal or infected blood, to maintain or amplify it, and then to transmit it to another animal [26]. Only successful demonstration of all of these abilities permits consideration of the vector as competent, but this remains insufficient to designate an arthropod as an effective vector for a defined infectious agent. Vector competence is invariable for a defined arthropod–pathogen couple. Location, climate, and entomological, ethological, and/or epidemiological parameters that may interfere in effective transmission must also be considered. This type of study, which is conducted in the wild, enables assessment of the potential vectorial capacity with a mathematical algorithm that includes the number of infected arthropods and the number of bites per night and per person [26]. Vectorial capacity varies for a defined arthropod–microbe couple. In considering bedbugs as vectors of infectious diseases, older studies in scientific literature mainly consist of logical but not evidence-based postulates [7]. Epidemiological links between human-disease prevalence in a population and bedbug presence, or infectious agent detection in wild bedbugs, without data concerning acquisition, multiplication, or transmission, led some authors to examine bedbug vectorial capacity [7, 27]. On the basis of some laboratory studies, we found relevant experimental evidence that ≥1 vectorial competence steps have been completed for bedbugs [6], but we found no published evidence for completion of all the necessary steps leading to the conclusion that bedbugs transmit a pathogen. Table 1 lists 45 pathogens reportedly found in bedbugs (without considering study quality) and classifies bedbug–pathogen couples according to their vectorial competence (eg, acquisition, maintenance, and transmission) and vectorial capacity (eg, reasoning and detection in the wild) criteria, with a summary of each study's results. Below, we focus on the best studied pathogens and/or the best candidates for transmission by bedbugs, such as Coxiella burnetii and Wolbachia spp among bacteria, Aspergillus spp among fungi, T. cruzi among parasites, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Table 1. Classification of Studies on Pathogens Carried by Cimex lectularius or Cimex hemipterus According to Their Vectorial Competence or Vectorial Capacity No. Pathogen Laboratory investigation: vectorial competence Maintenance Acquisition Replication† Detection Studies in the wild: vectorial capacity Detectiona Saliva Feces Transovarian Transmission to another animal Inference, deductive reasoning, or conjecture Found in wild bedbugs Bacteria 1 Bacillus anthracis No [7] Yes and no [7] 2 Bartonella quintana No [7] No [7] 3 Borrelia recurrentis Yes [7] Yes [7] 4 Borrelia duttoni No [7] 5 Brucella melitensis Yes [7] Yes [7] Yes [7] 6 Candidatus Midichloria mitochondrii Yes [36] 7 Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) Yes [7, 28, 29] Yes [28, 29] Yes [28, 29] Yes [28, 29] Yes, suspected [28, 29] Yes [28, 29] Yes [28, 29] 8 Francisella tularensis Yes [7] Yes [7] Yes, via feces [7] 9 Leptospira spp No [7] 10 Mycobacterium leprae Yes [7] No [7] Yes [7] No [7] Yes [7] 11 Mycobacterium tuberculosis Yes [6, 7] 12 Rickettsia africae No [7] 13 Rickettsia conorii Yes [7], injection No [7] No, meal; yes, injection [7] 14 Rickettsia prowazekii No [7] Yes [7] 15 Rickettsia rickettsii Yes [7], injection Yes and no [7] Yes and no, meal; yes, injection [7] Yes [7] No, via feces or meal [7] Yes [7] 16 Rickettsia typhi Yes [7], injection 17 Salmonella typhi Yes [7] Yes [7] Yes [7] Yes [7] 18 Staphylococcus aureus Yes [7] Yes [7] 19 Streptococcus pneumonia No dead bedbugs [7] Yes [33] 20 Wolbachia spp Yes [7] Yes [32, 33] 21 Yersinia pestis Yes [7] Fungi 22 Aspergillus flavus Yes, carried [6, 37] 23 Penicillium spp Yes, carried [37] 24 Scopulariopsis spp Yes, carried [37] Parasites (filariasis) 25 Brugia malayi Yes [7] No [7] Yes [7] 26 Wuchereria bancrofti Yes [7] No [7] Yes [7] 27 Mansonella ozzardi Yes [7] No [7] 28 Onchocerca volvulus No [7] No [7] 29 Leishmania braziliensis Yes [7] Yes [7] 30 Leishmania donovani Yes [7] No [7] Yes and no, stomach [7] Yes [7] No [7] No [7] 31 Leishmania tropica Yes and no [7] Yes [7] Yes [7] 32 Plasmodium spp Yes [7] 33 Trypanosoma cruzi Yes [6, 7, 39, 40] Yes [7, 39, 40] Yes [7, 39, 40] Yes and no, via feces [7, 39, 40] Yes [7, 39, 40] 34 Trypanosoma gambiense Yes [7] Viruses 35 Hepatitis B Yes [6] Yes and no [6] Yes [6] No [6] No [6] Yes [6] Yes [6] 36 Hepatitis C No [6] Yes [6] 37 Hepatitis E Yes [6] 38 Human immunodeficiency Yes [6] No [6] No [6] No [6] 39 Influenza Yes [7] 40 O'nyong-nyong No [46] 41 Polio Yes and no [7] 42 Rabies No [47] 43 Reovirus Yes [48] 44 Variola (smallpox) Yes [7] Yes [7] Yes [7] Yes [7] 45 Yellow fever Yes and no [7] Yes [7] NOTE. Classification of 45 microbes (bacteria, fungi, parasites, and viruses) in alphabetical order. For each pathogen, studies are classified according to vectorial competence (acquisition, maintenance, and transmission) and vectorial capacity (reasoning and detection in the wild). We intentionally listed a maximum of investigations without considering their quality to compare the process of studies. For each cell, no means negative results or failure, yes means positive results or success, and a blank cell means no published study was found. a After a blood meal (meal) or intragut injection (injection). Coxiella burnetii. Q fever is a cosmopolite disease transmitted by aerosolization of C. burnetii spores contained in goat, sheep, or cattle bedding or by consumption of unpasteurized milk products [28]. In the 1960s, bedbugs were successfully infected by feeding on infected guinea pigs [29]. C. burnetii has been isolated at all bedbug stages, which demonstrates transstadial transmission. C. burnetii reportedly persisted in the bedbugs for up to 250 days without loss of pathogenicity, multiplied therein, and were excreted in bedbug feces. In an epidemiological study conducted by the same author at the same period [30] around Leningrad (Russia), C. burnetii was detected in field-collected bedbugs, with the Q fever prevalence there estimated at 29.2% of the population. The results of the first study suggested that the insect was able to acquire, replicate, transmit to progeny, and excrete C. burnetii via feces. Thus, hypothetical vectorial competence of possible pathogen transmission to another animal has to be considered. An apparent relationship between high Q fever prevalence in the Leningrad population and bedbug infestation could be an epidemiological argument supporting vectorial capacity, but it remains questionable, because many confounding factors may intervene; for example, it is known that ticks are also a potential Q fever vector [31]. Finally, the potential ability of bedbugs to transmit C. burnetii to humans requires further investigation. Wolbachia spp. Wolbachia spp (among Anaplasmataceae bacteria) are obligate intracellular bacterial symbionts that change the reproductive capacities of many arthropod and filarial nematode hosts. This effect has enhanced medical and scientific interest in view of new therapeutic options. Wolbachia spp have been detected in most tested C. lectularius, are specifically located in the bacteriomes (specialized organs found mainly in some insects that host endosymbiotic bacteria), and appear to be obligate nutritional mutualists. Transovarial transmission to future generations has been established. Thus, arguments supporting bedbug vectorial competence and capacity to spread this ubiquitous microorganism exist, but its human pathogenicity remains unknown. More knowledge is needed before Wolbachia spp can be used as a weapon to control bedbugs (eg, through sterilization, which is required for symbiosis) [32–36]. Aspergillus spp. Aspergillus spp, along with various other molds (eg, Penicillium spp and Scopulariopsis spp) and bacteria (eg, Enterobacter spp and Staphylococcus spp), have been found on bedbugs. Like any biting or walking insect (such as cockroaches), bedbugs can be very good transporters and thus can participate in spreading molds [37]. Phoresy is the passive transportation of some pathogens by a carrier. To our knowledge, only such passive carriage could be a route of fungus transmission by bedbugs, but a real epidemiological impact remains to be proven. Furthermore, 9 bacterial and fungal species have been identified in male intromittent organs and bedbugs’ hiding places [8]. Trypanosoma cruzi. T. cruzi, which causes Chagas disease, is transmitted by kissing bugs. Bedbugs and kissing bugs have many similarities: both have reflexive feces excretion after a blood meal, which is an important behavioral feature responsible for transcutaneous T. cruzi transmission from kissing bugs [38]. Indeed, scratching pruritic bites facilitates mechanical entry of parasites contained in bedbug feces into bite sites. Moreover, Latin American biotopes of the 2 bugs live in proximity in the wild and around or in houses, and contacts between the 2 insects are frequent, mostly in rural areas or poor districts, where T. cruzi transmission is frequent. Pertinently, T. cruzi has been detected in wild bedbugs. Moreover, in experimental laboratory studies, after eating an infectious meal, the bedbug had acquired the parasite, which replicated and was detected in feces [39]. Transstadial transmission has also been proven, and Azevedo et al [39] studied bedbug salivary glands to precisely describe their ultrastructure, as T. cruzi stored therein might be transmitted during a blood meal. Thus, arguments supporting vectorial competence and capacity exist in the literature, and bedbug transmission to humans would not be unlikely. To date, T. cruzi is among the most studied candidates for transmision via feces or saliva, and ongoing experimental and epidemiological studies are trying to determine whether transmission is fact or fiction [6, 7, 39, 40]. Hepatitis B virus. According to the literature, HBV is the best candidate for transmission by bedbugs. HBV has frequently been detected in wild bedbugs [6, 41–43]. In the laboratory, it has been detected up to 2 months after an infectious meal or after direct injection into the bedbug, it has been found in feces, and transstadial transmission has been demonstrated. However, the majority of studies were unable to demonstrate virus multiplication and transmission to chimpanzees. Moreover, in a Gambian study, insecticide spraying of children's rooms was highly effective at reducing bedbug exposure but had no effect on HBV infection incidence, refuting the suspected relationship between children's HBV infections and bedbug presence [6]. Another study conducted in India obtained similar findings [6]. Finally, to date, no proof of effective transmission exists. Human immunodeficiency virus. HIV has never been found in wild bedbugs. HIV survived for 8 days after experimental feeding, with no replication in bedbugs, and has never been observed in bedbug feces. Transmission assays from bedbugs to laboratory animals failed, despite very high virus concentrations. Thus, even though acquisition and persistence attest to partial vectorial competence, no evidence supports that such transmission may occur or has ever occurred. Therefore, to date, HIV is no longer a valid candidate pathogen for bedbug–borne transmission [6]. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Because common bedbugs have a worldwide distribution, are hematophagus insects, and have been suspected of transmitting infectious diseases to humans, the medical community's interest has increased dramatically over the past 10 years. Although regional centralization of information about bedbug epidemics or infested clusters is lacking in many countries, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and the United States are leaders in collecting pest cases. As for head lice in schools, the insect's presence is known, but the majority of public health centers are unable to provide precise case numbers. Bedbugs have to be tracked, at least in public and crowded places (eg, hotels, trains, and dormitories). Furthermore, because of increasing travel and climate change, the scientific community has to monitor the differential identifications of C. lectularius (temperate climates) and C. hemipterus (tropical and temperate climates). Just as macroscopic identification of parasites is being confirmed more frequently by molecular biology analyses, the same holds true for the identification of these 2 bedbug species [44]. In each cluster, as is done in Australia, the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, other countries must work together to devise local eradication strategies and raise bedbug colonies to develop insecticide-susceptibility testing. Without the expansion of these different aspects of bedbug management, further escalation of this public health pest is expected, and the demand for information about effective control tactics will rise. For general practitioners, identification of bedbug bites is difficult because of patients’ widely varying immunological responses. A serological test should be developed [45]. Concerning the possible transmission of pathogens, we know that bedbugs can be carriers of >40 microorganisms in their stomach, feces, teguments, and/or saliva. Those pathogens were isolated from bedbugs captured in the wild and in human habitats, or after feeding on natural or artificial infected laboratory animals or after direct injection into bedbugs. But the majority of reports failed to demonstrate that C. lectularius and C. hemipterus are infectious disease vectors. However, those studies were generally old and did not benefit from modern tools to identify microorganisms. Furthermore, emerging bacteria (eg, C. burnetii or Wolbachia spp) have not been evaluated using these new biological approaches. The pathogens carried by wild bedbugs have to be investigated and updated with modern tools and parallel studies in bedbug and human samples, with blinded clinical assessment to detect the same pathogens independently. The discordance between microbe levels in bedbugs and low numbers of suspected germs transmitted remains a major enigma. We hypothesize that this insect's novel reproductive biology could affect this discordance. Among hematophagous arthropods feeding on humans, bedbugs are the only ones to mate by traumatic insemination. Bedbug immunity and infectious agent carriage could be related: frequent traumatic inseminations of a female are definitely a source of repeated pathogen introduction and thus a source of repeated immune stimulation. Because traumatic insemination has been shown to shorten the female lifespan, Reinhardt et al [34] presumed it to be a factor in the selection of high immunity bedbugs. These different factors and their various effects or interactions influence the female immune system, transmission intensity, and/or pathogen virulence. Some bacterial agents are likely to be obligate endosymbionts necessary for bedbug survival and evolution (eg, Wolbachia spp and other proteobacteria), whereas others are likely to be transstadially transmitted, such as HBV. Hence, the bedbug might only play the role of vector in pathogen transmission and, consequently, may be involved in human disease in special circumstances not yet discovered. Future investigations are needed to improve our knowledge on the medical importance of bedbugs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cureus
                Cureus
                2168-8184
                Cureus
                Cureus (Palo Alto (CA) )
                2168-8184
                14 May 2020
                May 2020
                : 12
                : 5
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA
                [2 ] Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA
                [3 ] Emergency Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, USA
                Author notes
                Article
                10.7759/cureus.8120
                7292720
                Copyright © 2020, Sheele et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                Categories
                Emergency Medicine
                Infectious Disease
                Environmental Health

                Comments

                Comment on this article