5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Similar but separate systems underlie perceptual bistability in vision and audition

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The dynamics of perceptual bistability, the phenomenon in which perception switches between different interpretations of an unchanging stimulus, are characterised by very similar properties across a wide range of qualitatively different paradigms. This suggests that perceptual switching may be triggered by some common source. However, it is also possible that perceptual switching may arise from a distributed system, whose components vary according to the specifics of the perceptual experiences involved. Here we used a visual and an auditory task to determine whether individuals show cross-modal commonalities in perceptual switching. We found that individual perceptual switching rates were significantly correlated across modalities. We then asked whether perceptual switching arises from some central (modality-) task-independent process or from a more distributed task-specific system. We found that a log-normal distribution best explained the distribution of perceptual phases in both modalities, suggestive of a combined set of independent processes causing perceptual switching. Modality- and/or task-dependent differences in these distributions, and lack of correlation with the modality-independent central factors tested (ego-resiliency, creativity, and executive function), also point towards perceptual switching arising from a distributed system of similar but independent processes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Visual competition.

          Binocular rivalry--the alternations in perception that occur when different images are presented to the two eyes--has been the subject of intensive investigation for more than 160 years. The psychophysical properties of binocular rivalry have been well described, but newer imaging and electrophysiological techniques have not resolved the issue of where in the brain rivalry occurs. The most recent evidence supports a view of rivalry as a series of processes, each of which is implemented by neural mechanisms at different levels of the visual hierarchy. Although unanswered questions remain, this view of rivalry might allow us to resolve some of the controversies and apparent contradictions that have emerged from its study.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neural bases of binocular rivalry.

            During binocular rivalry, conflicting monocular images compete for access to consciousness in a stochastic, dynamical fashion. Recent human neuroimaging and psychophysical studies suggest that rivalry entails competitive interactions at multiple neural sites, including sites that retain eye-selective information. Rivalry greatly suppresses activity in the ventral pathway and attenuates visual adaptation to form and motion; nonetheless, some information about the suppressed stimulus reaches higher brain areas. Although rivalry depends on low-level inhibitory interactions, high-level excitatory influences promoting perceptual grouping and selective attention can extend the local dominance of a stimulus over space and time. Inhibitory and excitatory circuits considered within a hybrid model might account for the paradoxical properties of binocular rivalry and provide insights into the neural bases of visual awareness itself.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception.

              Traditional explanations of multistable visual phenomena (e.g. ambiguous figures, perceptual rivalry) suggest that the basis for spontaneous reversals in perception lies in antagonistic connectivity within the visual system. In this review, we suggest an alternative, albeit speculative, explanation for visual multistability - that spontaneous alternations reflect responses to active, programmed events initiated by brain areas that integrate sensory and non-sensory information to coordinate a diversity of behaviors. Much evidence suggests that perceptual reversals are themselves more closely related to the expression of a behavior than to passive sensory responses: (1) they are initiated spontaneously, often voluntarily, and are influenced by subjective variables such as attention and mood; (2) the alternation process is greatly facilitated with practice and compromised by lesions in non-visual cortical areas; (3) the alternation process has temporal dynamics similar to those of spontaneously initiated behaviors; (4) functional imaging reveals that brain areas associated with a variety of cognitive behaviors are specifically activated when vision becomes unstable. In this scheme, reorganizations of activity throughout the visual cortex, concurrent with perceptual reversals, are initiated by higher, largely non-sensory brain centers. Such direct intervention in the processing of the sensory input by brain structures associated with planning and motor programming might serve an important role in perceptual organization, particularly in aspects related to selective attention.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sdenham@plymouth.a.cuk
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                8 May 2018
                8 May 2018
                2018
                : 8
                : 7106
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2219 0747, GRID grid.11201.33, University of Plymouth, Cognition Institute and School of Psychology, ; Plymouth, PL4 8AA UK
                [2 ]Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre of Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-1117 Budapest, Magyartudósok körútja 2 Hungary
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0807 2090, GRID grid.425397.e, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, ; H-2087 Piliscsaba, Egyetem street 1 Hungary
                [4 ]ISNI 0000000122931605, GRID grid.5590.9, Radboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Biophysics/85 PO Box 9010, ; 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0668 7884, GRID grid.5596.f, Leuven University, Department of Brain and Cognition, Tiensenstraat 102, ; 3000BE Leuven, Belgium
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0398 9387, GRID grid.417284.c, Philips Research, Department of Brain, Behavior and Cognition, High tech campus, Bldg 34, ; 5656AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7988, GRID grid.4305.2, University of Edinburgh, Department of Psychology, ; Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0988-5672
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3344-6151
                Article
                25587
                10.1038/s41598-018-25587-2
                5940790
                29740086
                4c7da890-50bf-4343-9cf2-144714f6c8c9
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 15 December 2017
                : 13 April 2018
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article