0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Use of a Convex Pouching System in the Postoperative Period : A National Consensus

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Convex pouching systems have been available for ostomy patients for decades; however, controversy remains over the use of convexity in the postoperative period. A group of 10 nurses and physicians with expertise caring for patients with an ostomy completed a scoping review identifying research-based evidence and gaps in our knowledge of the safety and effectiveness related to the use of a convex pouching system following ostomy surgery. Results of this scoping review demonstrated the need for a structured consensus to define best practices when selecting a pouching system that provides a secure and reliable seal around the stoma, avoids undermining and leakage of effluent from the pouching system, and contributes to optimal health-related quality of life for patients following ostomy surgery. The expert panel reached consensus on 8 statements for the use of convex products immediately after surgery and throughout the first 6 months after stoma creation, as well as describing goals in choosing the best pouching system for the patient with an ostomy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

          Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Medical Adhesives and Patient Safety

              Skin injury related to medical adhesive usage is a prevalent but underrecognized complication that occurs across all care settings and among all age groups. If proper technique for application and/or removal of adhesive products is not used, tissue trauma can occur, impacting patient safety and quality of life and increasing healthcare costs. Little guidance exists in the literature regarding appropriate selection and proper use of adhesive products to minimize medical adhesive-related skin injury, as well as best practices for skin care preventive strategies, application and removal techniques, and assessment and treatment of such injuries. In an effort to define best practices for prevention of such injury, a consensus panel of 23 recognized key opinion leaders convened to establish consensus statements on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of medical adhesive-related skin injury. The consensus summit was held in December 2012 and was made possible by an unrestricted educational grant from 3M. This document details the consensus definitions and statements and identifies research priorities for development of new adhesive technologies and protocols for skin protection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs
                J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs
                WOCN
                Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing
                Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
                1071-5754
                1528-3976
                May 2022
                06 May 2022
                : 49
                : 3
                : 240-246
                Affiliations
                Janice C. Colwell, MS, APRN, CWOCN, FAAN, Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
                Janet Stoia Davis, RN, CWOCN, FCN, Stoia Consultants, Riverside, California.
                Krisztina Emodi, NP-C, MPH, CNS, University of California San Francisco.
                Jane Fellows, MSN, RN-CNS, COCN-AP, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
                Mary Mahoney, MSN, RN, CWOCN, CFCN, UnityPoint at Home, Urbandale, Iowa.
                Bethany McDade, MS, AGPCNP-BC, CWON, Beaumont Health, Southfield, Michigan.
                Sima Porten, MD, University of California San Francisco.
                Elizabeth Raskin, MD, University of California, Davis.
                Terran Sims, MSN, ACNP-C, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
                Holly Norman, PhD, MBA, Coloplast, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
                Matthew T. Kelly, PhD, Coloplast, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
                Mikel Gray, PhD, RN, FNP, PNP, CUNP, CCCN, FAANP, FAAN, Department of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
                Author notes
                [*] Correspondence: Janice C. Colwell, MS, APRN, CWOCN, FAAN, Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, 1335 S. Prairie Ave, Chicago, IL 60605 ( janice.colwell@ 123456uchospitals.edu ).
                Article
                wocn4903p240
                10.1097/WON.0000000000000874
                9093727
                35523239
                4c8c1f1c-a917-45af-8346-56dcc96b29d0
                © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                Categories
                Ostomy Care
                Custom metadata
                T
                TRUE

                colostomy,convex pouching system,convexity,ileostomy,mucocutaneous junction,mucocutaneous separation,ostomy,peristomal skin complications,postoperative,urostomy

                Comments

                Comment on this article