20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mechanism of action of DSP-7888 (adegramotide/nelatimotide) Emulsion, a peptide-based therapeutic cancer vaccine with the potential to turn up the heat on non-immunoreactive tumors

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) is highly expressed in various solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. DSP-7888 (adegramotide/nelatimotide) Emulsion is an investigational therapeutic cancer vaccine comprising three synthetic epitopes derived from WT1. We evaluated the mechanism of action of DSP-7888 Emulsion, which is hypothesized to induce WT1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and helper T lymphocytes (HTLs).

          Methods

          The ability of nelatimotide and adegramotide to induce WT1-specific CD8 + T cells and CD4 + T cells was assessed in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The ability of DSP-7888 Emulsion to induce WT1-specific CTLs in vivo was assessed using human leukocyte antigen-I (HLA-I) transgenic mice. To assess how adegramotide, the helper peptide in DSP-7888 Emulsion, enhances WT1-specific CTLs, HLA-I transgenic mice were administered DSP-7888 or nelatimotide-only Emulsion. Interferon-gamma secretion under antigen stimulation by splenocytes co-cultured with or without tumor cells was then quantified. The effects of combination treatment with DSP-7888 Emulsion and an anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody on tumor volume and the frequency of tumor-infiltrating WT1-specific T cells were assessed in HLA-I transgenic mice implanted with WT1 antigen-positive tumors.

          Results

          The peptides in DSP-7888 Emulsion were shown to induce WT1-specific CTLs and HTLs in both human PBMCs and HLA-I transgenic mice. Unlike splenocytes from nelatimotide-only Emulsion-treated mice, splenocytes from DSP-7888 Emulsion-treated mice exhibited high levels of interferon-gamma secretion, including when co-cultured with tumor cells; interferon-gamma secretion was further enhanced by concomitant treatment with anti-PD-1. HLA-I transgenic mice administered DSP-7888 Emulsion plus anti-PD-1 experienced significantly greater reductions in tumor size than mice treated with either agent alone. This reduction in tumor volume was accompanied by increased numbers of tumor-infiltrating WT1-specific CTLs.

          Conclusions

          DSP-7888 Emulsion can promote both cytotoxic and helper T-cell-mediated immune responses against WT1-positive tumors. Adegramotide enhances CTL numbers, and the CTLs induced by treatment with both nelatimotide and adegramotide are capable of functioning within the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. The ability of anti-PD-1 to enhance the antitumor activity of DSP-7888 Emulsion in mice implanted with WT1-positive tumors suggests the potential for synergy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle.

          The genetic and cellular alterations that define cancer provide the immune system with the means to generate T cell responses that recognize and eradicate cancer cells. However, elimination of cancer by T cells is only one step in the Cancer-Immunity Cycle, which manages the delicate balance between the recognition of nonself and the prevention of autoimmunity. Identification of cancer cell T cell inhibitory signals, including PD-L1, has prompted the development of a new class of cancer immunotherapy that specifically hinders immune effector inhibition, reinvigorating and potentially expanding preexisting anticancer immune responses. The presence of suppressive factors in the tumor microenvironment may explain the limited activity observed with previous immune-based therapies and why these therapies may be more effective in combination with agents that target other steps of the cycle. Emerging clinical data suggest that cancer immunotherapy is likely to become a key part of the clinical management of cancer. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neoantigen vaccine generates intratumoral T cell responses in phase Ib glioblastoma trial

            Neoantigens, which are derived from tumour-specific protein-coding mutations, are exempt from central tolerance, can generate robust immune responses1,2 and can function as bona fide antigens that facilitate tumour rejection3. Here we demonstrate that a strategy that uses multi-epitope, personalized neoantigen vaccination, which has previously been tested in patients with high-risk melanoma4-6, is feasible for tumours such as glioblastoma, which typically have a relatively low mutation load1,7 and an immunologically 'cold' tumour microenvironment8. We used personalized neoantigen-targeting vaccines to immunize patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma following surgical resection and conventional radiotherapy in a phase I/Ib study. Patients who did not receive dexamethasone-a highly potent corticosteroid that is frequently prescribed to treat cerebral oedema in patients with glioblastoma-generated circulating polyfunctional neoantigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses that were enriched in a memory phenotype and showed an increase in the number of tumour-infiltrating T cells. Using single-cell T cell receptor analysis, we provide evidence that neoantigen-specific T cells from the peripheral blood can migrate into an intracranial glioblastoma tumour. Neoantigen-targeting vaccines thus have the potential to favourably alter the immune milieu of glioblastoma.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Effect of Nivolumab vs Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma : The CheckMate 143 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

              Question Does programmed cell death 1 immune checkpoint inhibition with nivolumab improve overall survival compared with bevacizumab treatment for patients with recurrent glioblastoma? Findings In this randomized phase 3 clinical trial of 369 patients diagnosed with recurrent glioblastoma treated with nivolumab, an improved survival benefit was not observed in patients who received nivolumab compared with bevacizumab-treated control patients. Meaning Additional research is needed; nivolumab monotherapy did not improve overall survival compared with bevacizumab in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. A study of nivolumab in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter is ongoing. This randomized clinical trial examines the effect of programmed cell death 1 immune checkpoint inhibition with nivolumab on overall survival for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Importance Clinical outcomes for glioblastoma remain poor. Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade has shown benefits in many cancer types. To our knowledge, data from a randomized phase 3 clinical trial evaluating a programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor therapy for glioblastoma have not been reported. Objective To determine whether single-agent PD-1 blockade with nivolumab improves survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma compared with bevacizumab. Design, Setting, and Participants In this open-label, randomized, phase 3 clinical trial, 439 patients with glioblastoma at first recurrence following standard radiation and temozolomide therapy were enrolled, and 369 were randomized. Patients were enrolled between September 2014 and May 2015. The median follow-up was 9.5 months at data cutoff of January 20, 2017. The study included 57 multicenter, multinational clinical sites. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or death. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results A total of 369 patients were randomized to nivolumab (n = 184) or bevacizumab (n = 185). The MGMT promoter was methylated in 23.4% (43/184; nivolumab) and 22.7% (42/185; bevacizumab), unmethylated in 32.1% (59/184; nivolumab) and 36.2% (67/185; bevacizumab), and not reported in remaining patients. At median follow-up of 9.5 months, median OS (mOS) was comparable between groups: nivolumab, 9.8 months (95% CI, 8.2-11.8); bevacizumab, 10.0 months (95% CI, 9.0-11.8); HR, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.83-1.30); P  = .76. The 12-month OS was 42% in both groups. The objective response rate was higher with bevacizumab (23.1%; 95% CI, 16.7%-30.5%) vs nivolumab (7.8%; 95% CI, 4.1%-13.3%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were similar between groups (nivolumab, 33/182 [18.1%]; bevacizumab, 25/165 [15.2%]), with no unexpected neurological TRAEs or deaths due to TRAEs. Conclusions and Relevance Although the primary end point was not met in this randomized clinical trial, mOS was comparable between nivolumab and bevacizumab in the overall patient population with recurrent glioblastoma. The safety profile of nivolumab in patients with glioblastoma was consistent with that in other tumor types. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02017717

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                masashi.goto@sumitomo-pharma.co.jp
                Journal
                Clin Transl Oncol
                Clin Transl Oncol
                Clinical & Translational Oncology
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1699-048X
                1699-3055
                23 September 2022
                23 September 2022
                : 1-12
                Affiliations
                GRID grid.417741.0, ISNI 0000 0004 1797 168X, Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd., ; 3-1-98, Kasugade Naka, Konohana-ku, Osaka, 554-0022 Japan
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1003-5074
                Article
                2946
                10.1007/s12094-022-02946-0
                9510518
                36138335
                4cc11465-026a-45f3-85e4-d4ca3a02eece
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 May 2022
                : 1 September 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd.
                Categories
                Research Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                dsp-7888,adegramotide,nelatimotide,therapeutic cancer vaccine,wilms' tumor 1 (wt1),immune checkpoint inhibitor,mechanism of action,tumor microenvironment,cytotoxic t lymphocytes,helper t lymphocytes

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log