Blog
About

15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Studies of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients that combine populations that are at high and low risk for reintubation suggest that conditioned high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy after extubation improves oxygenation compared with conventional oxygen therapy. However, conclusive data about reintubation are lacking.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          JAMA
          JAMA
          American Medical Association (AMA)
          1538-3598
          0098-7484
          Apr 05 2016
          : 315
          : 13
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain.
          [2 ] Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
          [3 ] Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofia, Madrid, Spain.
          [4 ] Hospital Sant Joan de Deu-Fundació Althaia, Manresa, Spain.
          [5 ] Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain6CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
          [6 ] Hospital Son Llatzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
          [7 ] Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
          [8 ] Research Unit, Medical Council, Toledo, Spain.
          [9 ] Hospital Sant Joan de Deu-Fundació Althaia, Manresa, Spain6CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain10Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain.
          Article
          2503420
          10.1001/jama.2016.2711
          26975498

          Comments

          Comment on this article