3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A qualitative study investigating the meaning of participation to improve the measurement of this construct

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The purpose of this study was to improve the measurement of participation. Research questions were as follows: (1) What constitutes participation according to adults? (2) Do they mention participation subdomains that are not covered in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) item bank “Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities”?

          Methods

          Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 46 adults from the general population. Interviews were thematically analysed using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as conceptual framework. Thereafter, assigned codes were compared to PROMIS item bank.

          Results

          Participants mentioned a variety of participation subdomains that were meaningful to them, such as socializing and employment. All subdomains could be classified into the ICF. The following subdomains were not covered by the PROMIS item bank: acquisition of necessities, education life, economic life, community life, and religion and spirituality. Also a distinction between remunerative (i.e. paid) and non-remunerative (i.e. unpaid) employment, and domestic life was missing. Several ICF sub-codes were not mentioned, such as ceremonies.

          Conclusions

          Many participation subdomains were mentioned to be meaningful. As several of these subdomains are not covered in the PROMIS item bank, it may benefit from extension with new (patient-)reported subdomains of participation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research?

          Telephone interviews are largely neglected in the qualitative research literature and, when discussed, they are often depicted as a less attractive alternative to face-to-face interviewing. The absence of visual cues via telephone is thought to result in loss of contextual and nonverbal data and to compromise rapport, probing, and interpretation of responses. Yet, telephones may allow respondents to feel relaxed and able to disclose sensitive information, and evidence is lacking that they produce lower quality data. This apparent bias against telephone interviews contrasts with a growing interest in electronic qualitative interviews. Research is needed comparing these modalities, and examining their impact on data quality and their use for studying varying topics and populations. Such studies could contribute evidence-based guidelines for optimizing interview data. 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities.

            Although participation is an important construct and valued goal, how it is conceptualized, defined and measured varies widely. This qualitative, multi-site study sought to gain an insider perspective from people with disabilities in grounding what participation means, how to characterize it, and the barriers and supports to participation. Sixty-three people self-identifying with diverse disabilities participated in qualitative focus groups across sites. Participants conceptualized participation as a cluster of values that included active and meaningful engagement/being a part of, choice and control, access and opportunity/enfranchisement, personal and societal responsibilities, having an impact and supporting others, and social connection, inclusion and membership. No gold standard for ideal or optimal participation emerged; no one defined set or frequency of activities accounted for 'full' participation. Participants described needing to be free to define and pursue participation on their own terms rather than meeting predetermined societal norms. Participation was viewed as both a right and a responsibility, influenced by and ascribed to the person and to the society. Participation does not occur in a vacuum; the environment dynamically influences participation. Implications of this conceptual framing for assessment, research and systems level change to support participation of people with disabilities are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Patient-Reported Outcomes - Are They Living Up to Their Potential?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31 (0)24 3615524 , a.dewind@psych.ru.nl
                Journal
                Qual Life Res
                Qual Life Res
                Quality of Life Research
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                0962-9343
                1573-2649
                16 April 2019
                16 April 2019
                2019
                : 28
                : 8
                : 2233-2246
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1754 9227, GRID grid.12380.38, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, , Amsterdam UMC, VU University, ; Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000000404654431, GRID grid.5650.6, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, , Amsterdam UMC, AMC, ; Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1754 9227, GRID grid.12380.38, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, , Amsterdam UMC, VU University, ; Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [4 ]ISNI 0000000404654431, GRID grid.5650.6, Research Center for Insurance Medicine: collaboration between AMC–UMCG–UWV–VUmc, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1754 9227, GRID grid.12380.38, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, , Amsterdam UMC, VU University, ; Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1754 9227, GRID grid.12380.38, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, , Amsterdam UMC, VU University, ; Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3574-9906
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4672-9062
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6952-357X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8657-0917
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1942-6848
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8421-3630
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0461-4013
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1218-775X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2596-5055
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6828-9056
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4570-2826
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4134-4577
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2228-1187
                Article
                2179
                10.1007/s11136-019-02179-9
                6620252
                30993605
                4cec365e-48d8-4c3d-83fb-b6cd857a0401
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 4 March 2019
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

                Public health
                participation,icf,promis,measurement development,item bank,qualitative research
                Public health
                participation, icf, promis, measurement development, item bank, qualitative research

                Comments

                Comment on this article