10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dosimetric evaluation of four whole brain radiation therapy approaches with hippocampus and inner ear avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost for limited brain metastases

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          To perform a dosimetric evaluation of four different simultaneous integrated boost whole brain radiotherapy modalities with hippocampus and inner ear avoidance in the treatment of limited brain metastases.

          Methods

          Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging data of 10 patients with limited (1–5) brain metastases were used to replan step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (sIMRT), dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (dIMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and helical tomotherapy (Tomo). The prescribed doses of 40–50 Gy in 10 fractions and 30 Gy in 10 fractions were simultaneously delivered to the metastatic lesions and the whole-brain volume, respectively. The hippocampal dose met the RTOG 0933 criteria for hippocampal avoidance (Dmax ≤17 Gy, D100% ≤10 Gy). The inner ear dose was restrained to Dmean ≤15 Gy. Target coverage (TC), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), maximum dose (Dmax), minimum dose (Dmin) and dose to organs at risk (OARs) were compared.

          Results

          All plans met the indicated dose restrictions. The mean percentage of planning target volume of metastases (PTVmets) coverage ranged from 97.1 to 99.4%. For planning target volume of brain (PTVbrain), Tomo provided the lowest average D2% (37.5 ± 2.8 Gy), the highest average D98% (25.2 ± 2.0 Gy), and the best TC (92.6% ± 2.1%) and CI (0.79 ± 0.06). The two fixed gantry IMRT modalities (step and shot, dynamic) provided similar PTVbrain dose homogeneity (both 0.76). Significant differences across the four approaches were observed for the maximum and minimum doses to the hippocampus and the maximum doses to the eyes, lens and optic nerves.

          Conclusion

          All four radiotherapy modalities produced acceptable treatment plans with good avoidance of the hippocampus and inner ear. Tomo obtained satisfactory PTVbrain coverage and the best homogeneity index.

          Trial registration

          Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03414944. Registered 29 January 2018

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preservation of memory with conformal avoidance of the hippocampal neural stem-cell compartment during whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (RTOG 0933): a phase II multi-institutional trial.

          Hippocampal neural stem-cell injury during whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) may play a role in memory decline. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy can be used to avoid conformally the hippocampal neural stem-cell compartment during WBRT (HA-WBRT). RTOG 0933 was a single-arm phase II study of HA-WBRT for brain metastases with prespecified comparison with a historical control of patients treated with WBRT without hippocampal avoidance. Eligible adult patients with brain metastases received HA-WBRT to 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Standardized cognitive function and quality-of-life (QOL) assessments were performed at baseline and 2, 4, and 6 months. The primary end point was the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Delayed Recall (HVLT-R DR) at 4 months. The historical control demonstrated a 30% mean relative decline in HVLT-R DR from baseline to 4 months. To detect a mean relative decline ≤ 15% in HVLT-R DR after HA-WBRT, 51 analyzable patients were required to ensure 80% statistical power with α = 0.05. Of 113 patients accrued from March 2011 through November 2012, 42 patients were analyzable at 4 months. Mean relative decline in HVLT-R DR from baseline to 4 months was 7.0% (95% CI, -4.7% to 18.7%), significantly lower in comparison with the historical control (P < .001). No decline in QOL scores was observed. Two grade 3 toxicities and no grade 4 to 5 toxicities were reported. Median survival was 6.8 months. Conformal avoidance of the hippocampus during WBRT is associated with preservation of memory and QOL as compared with historical series. © 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plans

            ✓ A conformity index is a measure of how well the volume of a radiosurgical dose distribution conforms to the size and shape of a target volume. Because the success of radiosurgery is related to the extremely conformal irradiation of the target, an accurate method for describing this parameter is important. Existing conformity ratios and indices used in radiosurgery are reviewed and criticized. It will be demonstrated that previously proposed measurements of conformity can, under certain conditions, give false perfect scores. A new conformity index is derived that gives an objective score of conformity for a treatment plan and gives no false scores. An analysis of five different treatment plans is made using both the existing scoring methods and the new conformity index.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Multi-institutional Prospective Observational Study of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients With Multiple Brain Metastases (JLGK0901 Study Update): Irradiation-related Complications and Long-term Maintenance of Mini-Mental State Examination Scores.

              The JLGK0901 study showed the noninferiority of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone as initial treatment of 5 to 10 brain metastases (BMs) compared with 2 to 4 BMs in terms of overall survival and most secondary endpoints (Lancet Oncol 2014;15:387-95). However, observation periods were not long enough to allow confirmation of the long-term safety of SRS alone in patients with 5 to 10 BMs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                xzjaj@126.com
                1016164144@qq.com
                zhaofen1029@126.com
                doctormrwu@126.com
                dpshangdzpy@163.com
                yqxdf@163.com
                wangshuzhen19820903@163.com
                zhujian.cn@163.com
                yangfengchang@163.com
                +86-531-67626931 , yuanshuanghu@sina.com
                Journal
                Radiat Oncol
                Radiat Oncol
                Radiation Oncology (London, England)
                BioMed Central (London )
                1748-717X
                15 March 2019
                15 March 2019
                2019
                : 14
                : 46
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1761 1174, GRID grid.27255.37, Shandong University, ; Jinan, 250117 Shandong China
                [2 ]GRID grid.440144.1, Department of Radiation Oncology, , Shandong Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, ; 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117 Shandong China
                Article
                1255
                10.1186/s13014-019-1255-7
                6419811
                30876444
                4cf05386-43eb-48a0-bb7a-b30a2da13265
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 10 September 2018
                : 7 March 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: the Shandong Key Research and Development Plan
                Award ID: 2017CXGC1209
                Award ID: 2017GSF18164
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: the Outstanding Youth Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
                Award ID: JQ201423
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: the Jinan Clinical Medicine Science and Technology Innovation Plan
                Award ID: 201704095
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809, National Natural Science Foundation of China;
                Award ID: 81372413
                Award ID: 81671785
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
                Award ID: 2016ZRC03118
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: the National Key Research and Development Program of China
                Award ID: 2016YFC0904700
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: the Project of Invigorating Health Care through Science, Technology and Education
                Award ID: CXTDA2017034
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                brain metastases,dosimetry,hippocampus,inner ear,intensity-modulated radiation therapy,volumetric-modulated arc therapy,tomotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article