Data for oropharyngeal leak pressure, peak inspiratory pressure, and gastric tube insertion success rate of supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic surgeries (A network meta-analysis dataset)

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

This article presents dataset of network meta-analysis (NMA) and systemic review, entitled, Comparison of supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic surgeries: A network meta-analysis Yoon SW et al., 2019. The data tables demonstrate numeric values for endpoints: oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) before and after pneumoperitoneum, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) before and after pneumoperitoneum, and gastric tube insertion success rate for each supraglottic airway device (SAD). All relevant randomized controlled trials published up to 31 March 2018 were collected from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar databases. 26 studies with a total of 2142 patients that included eight different SADs were included. The data described in this article are available as a supplementary file.

Related collections

Most cited references 4

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

A randomized comparison of the Ambu AuraGain versus the LMA supreme in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery.

Ana M. V. López, Mercè Agustí, Pedro Gambus … (2017)

Second generation supraglottic airway devices providing high seal airway pressures are suitable for patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy. We compared the seal pressure achieved by the new Ambu AuraGain™ versus LMA Supreme™ following pneumoperitoneum in the Trendelenburg position. Sixty female patients were randomly allocated to ventilation with either the AuraGain or the Supreme. A target-controlled system was used to administer total intravenous anesthesia. Intracuff pressure was maintained below 60 cm H2O. The following parameters were registered: Time, number of attempts and manoeuvres required for insertion; seal pressure and peak inspiratory pressure at four time points; ease of gastric tube insertion, flexible scope view, complications and postoperative morbidity. Both devices were quick and easily inserted, although the Supreme required less rotation manoeuvres (16 in AuraGain vs. 6 in LMA Supreme; p = 0.01). The AuraGain achieved higher seal pressures (34 ± 5 in AuraGain vs. 29 ± 5 in LMA Supreme; p = 0.0002). Following pneumoperitoneum in head-down position, peak airway pressure increased 9 ± 3 cm H2O in both groups, exceeding seal pressure in 3 patients in the Supreme group (p = 0.06). The vocal cords were seen through all AuraGain and 90% of the Supreme devices; epiglottis was often visible inside the tube (68%). No differences were found in the incidence of traces of blood on the mask or postoperative symptoms. Both devices allowed effective ventilation in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery with a low rate of complications. The Ambu AuraGain provided higher seal pressures and a clear view of glottic inlet in all patients offering the possibility to guide direct tracheal intubation if required.

0 comments Cited 9 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Standard Laryngeal Mask Airway and LMA-ProSeal during laparoscopic surgery.

Giuseppe Natalini, Piera Dell'Agnolo, Antonio Rosano … (2003)

To compare the frequency of airway seal and sore throat with the LMA-ProSeal (PLMA) and the standard Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) during laparoscopic surgery. Prospective, controlled, randomized, nonblinded clinical study. University-affiliated hospital. 60 adult, ASA physical status I, II, and III patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with general anesthesia, without contraindication to the use of the laryngeal mask. Patients were randomized to receive mechanical ventilation [tidal volume (V(T)) 7 mL/kg(-1); positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 10 cmH(2)O] through the PLMA or the standard LMA, both equipped with a gastric tube. Heart rate, arterial pressure, inspiratory and expiratory V(T), airway pressure, end-tidal CO(2) partial pressure, and pulse oximetry were recorded. The leak fraction was calculated as the difference between the inspiratory and expiratory V(T) divided by the inspiratory V(T). Postoperative sore throat frequency was scored in the recovery room ("early") and 1 week after surgery ("late"). All patients were successfully ventilated through the assigned laryngeal mask. The leak fraction was 7 +/- 3% with the LMA and 7 +/- 4% with the PLMA (p = 0.731). In one patient, the PLMA drainage tube was not patent despite a leak fraction of 5%, and there was no clinically detectable air leak. During the recovery room stay, the frequency of sore throat was scored as mild in 13% and 10% of patients with the standard LMA and the PLMA, respectively, and was absent in the remaining patients (p = 0.99, between groups). There were no differences in the frequency of sore throat between the "early" and "late" evaluations (p = 0.99). The PLMA and the LMA show similar airtight efficiency during laparoscopy. The patency of the PLMA drainage tube should always be confirmed. The sore throat evaluation performed in recovery room appears as reliable as later evaluations.

0 comments Cited 6 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

[Comparison and superiority of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway to laryngeal mask airway or tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopy].

Jing Xu, Tai-di Zhong (2010)

To compare the variations of hemodynamics or respiratory parameters and postoperative complications incidence in gynecological laparoscopy to perform Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA), Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) or Tracheal Tube (TT) and to appraise the safety or superiority SLIPA in gynecological laparoscopy.

0 comments Cited 3 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Contributors

Hyun Kang

Journal

Journal ID (nlm-ta): Data Brief

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Data Brief

Title: Data in Brief

Publisher: Elsevier

ISSN (Electronic): 2352-3409

Publication date PMC-release: 21 November 2019

Publication date Collection: February 2020

Publication date (Electronic): 21 November 2019

Volume: 28

Electronic Location Identifier: 104852

Affiliations

[1]Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, South Korea

Author notes

[∗ ]Corresponding author. roman00@ 123456naver.com

Article

Publisher ID: S2352-3409(19)31207-7 Publisher ID: 104852

DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104852

PMC ID: 6909156

SO-VID: 4d0ae9fc-70a3-439e-beb9-cbe70c9269c3

License:

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

History

Date received : 26 August 2019

Date revision received : 12 November 2019

Date accepted : 14 November 2019

Data for oropharyngeal leak pressure, peak inspiratory pressure, and gastric tube insertion success rate of supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic surgeries (A network meta-analysis dataset)

Read this article at

Abstract

Related collections

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Most cited references 4

A randomized comparison of the Ambu AuraGain versus the LMA supreme in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery.

Standard Laryngeal Mask Airway and LMA-ProSeal during laparoscopic surgery.

[Comparison and superiority of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway to laryngeal mask airway or tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopy].

Author and article information

Contributors

Journal

Affiliations

Author notes

Article

History

Categories

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 241

Most referenced authors 32