23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A quality improvement project using a problem based post take ward round proforma based on the SOAP acronym to improve documentation in acute surgical receiving

      research-article
      ,
      Annals of Medicine and Surgery
      Elsevier
      Documentation, Proforma, Surgical receiving, SOAP acronym, Quality improvement, Audit

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Ward round documentation provides one of the most important means of communication between healthcare professionals. We aimed to establish if the use of a problem based standardised proforma can improve documentation in acute surgical receiving.

          Methods

          Gold standards were established using the RCSE record keeping guidelines. We audited documentation for seven days using the following headings: patient name/identification number, subjective findings, objective findings, clinical impression/diagnosis, plan, diet status, discharge decision, discharge planning, signature, and grade.

          After the initial audit cycle, a ward round proforma was introduced using the above headings and re-audited over a seven day period.

          Results

          The pre-intervention arm contained 50 patients and the post intervention arm contained 47. The following headings showed an improvement in documentation compliance to 100%: patient name/identification number vs 96%, subjective findings vs 84%, objective findings vs 48%, plan vs 98%, signature vs 96%, and grade vs 62%. Documentation of the clinical impression/diagnosis improved to 98% vs 30%, diet status rose to 83% vs 16%, discharge decision to 66% vs 16%, and discharge planning to 40% vs 20%.

          Conclusions

          Standardised proformas improve the documentation of post-take ward round notes. This helps to clarify the onward management plan for all aspects of a patient's care and will help avoid adverse events and litigation. This should improve the quality and safety of Patient Care.

          Highlights

          • Proformas improved documentation.

          • Clarify management plans.

          • Improve patient safety.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Standards of documentation of the surgeon-patient consultation in current surgical practice.

          This study was designed to assess the reliability of the system whereby junior doctors document the surgeon-patient consultation in general surgical practice in the UK. A prospective observational study was carried out, with an independent observer recording details of the surgeon-patient consultation and assessing the reliability of documentation. An exact record of the information given by consultants was transcribed in shorthand at the time of consultation. Data were recorded in the categories recommended for notation by the General Medical Council: clinical findings, decisions made, information given to patient and treatment prescribed. Case notes were examined within 24 h of the ward round to ascertain reliability of the documentation. The study population comprised 432 surgeon-patient consultations. There were important deficiencies in the documentation of consultants' clinical findings and management decisions. In addition, information given by consultants to the patients regarding clinical findings and treatment planned (including the need for operation) was recorded in a median of 6 per cent of consultations. This study provides objective evidence of shortfalls in the documentation of the surgeon-patient consultation process. These deficiencies are such that, under present circumstances, the requirements of the General Medical Council with respect to case note documentation are not fulfilled in this setting.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Do post-take ward round proformas improve communication and influence quality of patient care?

            The post-take ward round is a critical time for reviewing the initial history, examination and results, and the stage at which further treatment and investigations will be determined. However documentation of this ward round is often inadequate, so the benefits of decision making are lost. The documentation of 95 ward rounds was assessed for key items of information before and after the introduction of a proforma sheet. The introduction of the proforma led to a significant improvement in the documentation of a diagnosis, management plan, prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis, and resuscitation status (p<0.05), which will have a significant impact on patient care.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tomorrow's doctors: today's mistakes?

              Tomorrow's Doctors, published by the General Medical Council of the UK in December 1993, has prompted far-reaching changes to medical education in Britain. We draw attention to some inconsistencies in the document and to those aspects of it that we maintain are undesirable. We question the emphasis in Tomorrow's Doctors on change in view of the unchanging nature of the structure and function of the human body. We doubt the wisdom of exhorting students to learn through curiosity and experiment, such methods being wasteful of time and resources when used in the context of accepted core material. We do not accept that the information overload is an automatic result of traditional methods of delivering education, and we are by no means convinced that the university model is the right one for medical education. In the face of experts being unable to agree on or to define scientific method, we wonder if consideration of this is appropriate in an undergraduate medical course, and we doubt that ethics and criticism are rightly placed in the undergraduate curriculum. The drawbacks of systems-based teaching are considered in the light of the disease process, and we draw attention to the lack of evidence for the document's condemnation of departmental structures and its uncritical espousal of integration. Finally, we consider some of the ways in which these changes have affected anatomy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Ann Med Surg (Lond)
                Ann Med Surg (Lond)
                Annals of Medicine and Surgery
                Elsevier
                2049-0801
                12 December 2015
                February 2016
                12 December 2015
                : 5
                : 45-48
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Surgery, Victoria Infirmary, Langside Road, Glasgow, G42 9TY, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. rdolan@ 123456nhs.net
                Article
                S2049-0801(15)00131-4
                10.1016/j.amsu.2015.11.011
                4706565
                26858834
                4d25c180-71b8-4fd7-ac71-3bd63e871687
                © 2015 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 13 August 2015
                : 26 November 2015
                : 27 November 2015
                Categories
                Original Research

                documentation,proforma,surgical receiving,soap acronym,quality improvement,audit

                Comments

                Comment on this article