0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Brazilian Consensus on Psoriasis 2020 and Treatment Algorithm of the Brazilian Society of Dermatology ☆☆

      brief-report
      a , * , b , c , Grupo de Trabalho do Consenso Brasileiro de Psoríase da Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia 1
      Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
      Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Método DELPHI: caracterização e potencialidades na pesquisa em Educação

          Resumo Este artigo apresenta e discute o método Delphi e suas aplicações em Educação. Trata-se de um método com grande potencial como ferramenta metodológica, amplamente usado em pesquisas de várias áreas do conhecimento, mas ainda pouco utilizado no Brasil. Parece, então, pertinente ampliar a discussão sobre suas potencialidades, de modo a subsidiar a sua utilização tanto nas pesquisas em Educação como no planejamento e na gestão educacional. Assim, por meio de uma revisão narrativa da literatura da área, pretende-se dar a conhecer suas características e pressupostos, bem como descrever seu processo de implementação e análise. Serão ainda discutidas as principais vantagens e desvantagens do método, descritas as aplicações mais comuns e apontadas as suas potencialidades nas pesquisas em Educação.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence of psoriasis in Brazil - a geographical survey.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Consensus development for healthcare professionals

              Consensus development sprang from a desire to synthesize clinician and expert opinions on clinical practice and research agendas in the 1950s. And since the American Institute of Medicine formally defined "guidelines" in 1990, there has been a proliferation of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) both formally and informally. This modern decision-making tool used by both physicians and patients, requires extensive planning to overcome the challenges of consensus development while reaping its rewards. Consensus allows for a group approach of multiple experts sharing ideas to form consensus on topics ranging from appropriateness of procedures to research agenda development. Disagreements can shed light on areas of controversy and launch further discussions. It has five main components: three inputs (defining the task, participant identification and recruitment, and information synthesis), the approach (consensus development by explicit or implicit means), and the output (dissemination of results). Each aspect requires extensive planning a priori as they influence the entire process, from how information will be interpreted, the interaction of participants, the resulting judgment, to whether there will be uptake of results. Implicit approaches utilize qualitative methods and/or a simple voting structure of majority wins, and are used in informal consensus development methods and consensus development conferences. Explicit approaches aggregate results or judgments using explicit rules set a priori with definitions of "agreement" or consensus. Because the implicit process can be more opaque, unforeseen challenges can emerge such as the undue influence of a minority. And yet, the logistics of explicit approaches may be more time consuming and not appropriate when speed is a priority. In determining which method to use, it is important to understand the pros and cons of different approaches and how it will affect the overall input, approach, and outcome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                An Bras Dermatol
                An Bras Dermatol
                Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
                Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia
                0365-0596
                1806-4841
                23 September 2021
                Nov-Dec 2021
                23 September 2021
                : 96
                : 6
                : 778-781
                Affiliations
                [a ]Dermatology Department of Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brazil
                [b ]Hospital Moinhos de Vento de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
                [c ]Instituto Bahiano de Imunoterapias, Salvador, BA, Brazil
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. rromiti@ 123456hotmail.com
                [1]

                The list of participants is available in Appendix A.

                Article
                S0365-0596(21)00215-4
                10.1016/j.abd.2021.03.007
                8790202
                34565644
                4d5dc4e6-aa34-4d8d-a6e2-26e03080667a
                © 2021 Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 20 February 2021
                : 7 March 2021
                Categories
                Research Letter

                Comments

                Comment on this article