23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The evolution of larval morphology during the post-Paleozoic radiation of echinoids

      Paleobiology
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The post-Paleozoic radiation of echinoids entailed a rapid diversification not only of adult morphology, but also of larval morphology. The timing, order, and phylogenetic distribution of evolutionary transformations in echinopluteus larvae are reconstructed here under maximum parsimony assumptions from a large neontological data base. Many echinoid larval apomorphies apparently evolved within the Paleozoic stem lineage and were subsequently retained during much of the crown-group radiation. This suite of apomorphies includes most (and perhaps all) of the skeletal elements and some features of soft anatomy such as vibratile lobes. Other features apparently arose or were modified during the post-Paleozoic radiation. These include skeletal features such as arm-rod structure and length, and soft structures such as epaulettes and skeletal muscles. Transformational hypotheses of this kind can be supported or rejected with further neontological data, and many can potentially be tested from fossil evidence. Many post-Paleozoic transformations in echinopluteus structure may be adaptive. For example, increases in arm length and flattening of arm ectoderm may increase feeding rate and efficiency, and both types of transformation have occurred several times within the crown group. Relational hypotheses of this nature can be tested through comparative functional studies in extant echinoplutei. Parallel evolutionary losses of feeding in echinoplutei are accompanied by loss or modification of characteristic structures. This suggests that developmental constraints do not fully explain the conservation of these structures in planktotrophic echinoplutei. Comparisons of larval and adult morphology over congruent time intervals demonstrate that the origin of many orders was accompanied by a suite of synapomorphies in larval morphology that was subsequently conserved. Many details of echinopluteus morphology are therefore of taxonomic significance. Intraordinal patterns of larval diversity, however, vary considerably. That larval morphology has diversified independently of adult morphology indicates that mosaic evolution has occurred within the life cycle and suggests that echinoid larvae and adults can and do respond to selection independently. Taken together, these findings underscore the complex ways in which complex life cycles can evolve.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Toward Defining the Course of Evolution: Minimum Change for a Specific Tree Topology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Outgroup Analysis and Parsimony

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Reconstructing ancestral character states under Wagner parsimony

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                applab
                Paleobiology
                Paleobiology
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                0094-8373
                1938-5331
                1992
                February 8 2016
                1992
                : 18
                : 03
                : 258-287
                Article
                10.1017/S0094837300010848
                4d5f49c2-ba1f-4292-b74e-68922babe810
                © 1992
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article