Cannabis Vaping Among Youth and Young Adults: a Scoping Review

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review was to describe the state-of-the-literature on research specific to cannabis vaping among youth and young adults.

Recent Findings

Out of 1801 records identified, a total of 202 articles met eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review. Most of this literature (46.0% of studies) was specific to the health effects of cannabis vaping, particularly EVALI (e-cigarette and vaping associated lung injury). Other research areas identified in the review included the etiology (24.3%) and epidemiology (24.8%) of cannabis vaping, in addition to articles on regulation (8.4%) and marketing (5.5%) of the same.

Summary

Cannabis vaping is increasingly common among youth and young adults and more prevalent is settings where recreational use for adults has been legalized. The literature documents a number of negative health effects of cannabis vaping for young people, along with risk factors and reasons for the same.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40429-022-00413-y.

Related collections

Most cited references 202

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

Adrian Aldcroft, Chantelle Garritty, Simon Lewin … (2018)

Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.

0 comments Cited 6949 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.

Maria J Grant, Andrew Booth (2009)

The expansion of evidence-based practice across sectors has lead to an increasing variety of review types. However, the diversity of terminology used means that the full potential of these review types may be lost amongst a confusion of indistinct and misapplied terms. The objective of this study is to provide descriptive insight into the most common types of reviews, with illustrative examples from health and health information domains. Following scoping searches, an examination was made of the vocabulary associated with the literature of review and synthesis (literary warrant). A simple analytical framework -- Search, AppraisaL, Synthesis and Analysis (SALSA) -- was used to examine the main review types. Fourteen review types and associated methodologies were analysed against the SALSA framework, illustrating the inputs and processes of each review type. A description of the key characteristics is given, together with perceived strengths and weaknesses. A limited number of review types are currently utilized within the health information domain. Few review types possess prescribed and explicit methodologies and many fall short of being mutually exclusive. Notwithstanding such limitations, this typology provides a valuable reference point for those commissioning, conducting, supporting or interpreting reviews, both within health information and the wider health care domain.

0 comments Cited 1490 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Pulmonary Illness Related to E-Cigarette Use in Illinois and Wisconsin — Preliminary Report

Jennifer E. Layden, Isaac Ghinai, Ian W. Pray … (2019)

New England Journal of Medicine

0 comments Cited 298 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Contributors

Melissa B. Harrell: Melissa.B.Harrell@uth.tmc.edu

Journal

Journal ID (nlm-ta): Curr Addict Rep

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Curr Addict Rep

Title: Current Addiction Reports

Publisher: Springer International Publishing (Cham )

ISSN (Electronic): 2196-2952

Publication date (Electronic): 7 May 2022

Publication date PMC-release: 7 May 2022

Pages: 1-18

Affiliations

[1 ]GRID grid.468222.8, School of Public Health, , University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), ; 1616 Guadalupe St., Suite 6.300, Austin, TX 78701 USA

[2 ]Center for Research to Advance Community Health, UTHealth San Antonio, San Antonio, TX USA

Article

Publisher ID: 413

DOI: 10.1007/s40429-022-00413-y

PMC ID: 9078633

PubMed ID: 35573056

SO-VID: 4d68f78b-064b-4980-9d9a-420db645f55b

License:

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

History

Date accepted : 26 April 2022

Funding

Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000054, National Cancer Institute;

Cannabis Vaping Among Youth and Young Adults: a Scoping Review

Read this article at

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Supplementary Information

Related collections

Zoonoses

Most cited references 202

PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.

Pulmonary Illness Related to E-Cigarette Use in Illinois and Wisconsin — Preliminary Report

Author and article information

Contributors

Journal

Affiliations

Article

History

Funding

Categories

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 1,407

Cited by 7

Most referenced authors 2,701