10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Preoperative intravenous iron to treat anaemia before major abdominal surgery (PREVENTT): a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Preoperative anaemia affects a high proportion of patients undergoing major elective surgery and is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to test the hypothesis that intravenous iron given to anaemic patients before major open elective abdominal surgery would correct anaemia, reduce the need for blood transfusions, and improve patient outcomes.

          Methods

          In a double-blind, parallel-group randomised trial, we recruited adult participants identified with anaemia at preoperative hospital visits before elective major open abdominal surgery at 46 UK tertiary care centres. Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin less than 130 g/L for men and 120 g/L for women. We randomly allocated participants (1:1) via a secure web-based service to receive intravenous iron or placebo 10–42 days before surgery. Intravenous iron was administered as a single 1000 mg dose of ferric carboxymaltose in 100 mL normal saline, and placebo was 100 mL normal saline, both given as an infusion over 15 min. Unblinded study personnel prepared and administered the study drug; participants and other clinical and research staff were blinded to treatment allocation. Coprimary endpoints were risk of the composite outcome of blood transfusion or death, and number of blood transfusions from randomisation to 30 days postoperatively. The primary analysis included all randomly assigned patients with data available for the primary endpoints; safety analysis included all randomly assigned patients according to the treatment received. This study is registered, ISRCTN67322816, and is closed to new participants.

          Findings

          Of 487 participants randomly assigned to placebo (n=243) or intravenous iron (n=244) between Jan 6, 2014, and Sept 28, 2018, complete data for the primary endpoints were available for 474 (97%) individuals. Death or blood transfusion occurred in 67 (28%) of the 237 patients in the placebo group and 69 (29%) of the 237 patients in the intravenous iron group (risk ratio 1·03, 95% CI 0·78–1·37; p=0·84). There were 111 blood transfusions in the placebo group and 105 in the intravenous iron group (rate ratio 0·98, 95% CI 0·68–1·43; p=0·93). There were no significant differences between the two groups for any of the prespecified safety endpoints.

          Interpretation

          Preoperative intravenous iron was not superior to placebo to reduce need for blood transfusion when administered to patients with anaemia 10–42 days before elective major abdominal surgery.

          Funding

          UK National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Program.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.

            (1990)
            In the course of developing a standardised, non-disease-specific instrument for describing and valuing health states (based on the items in Table 1), the EuroQol Group (whose members are listed in the Appendix) conducted postal surveys in England, The Netherlands and Sweden which indicate a striking similarity in the relative valuations attached to 14 different health states. The data were collected using a visual analogue scale similar to a thermometer. The EuroQol instrument is intended to complement other quality-of-life measures and to facilitate the collection of a common data set for reference purposes. Others interested in participating in the extension of this work are invited to contact the EuroQol Group.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue.

              The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) is a 20-item self-report instrument designed to measure fatigue. It covers the following dimensions: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, Reduced Motivation and Reduced Activity. This new instrument was tested for its psychometric properties in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome, psychology students, medical students, army recruits and junior physicians. We determined the dimensional structure using confirmatory factor analyses (LISREL's unweighted least squares method). The hypothesized five-factor model appeared to fit the data in all samples tested (AGFIs > 0.93). The instrument was found to have good internal consistency, with an average Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.84. Construct validity was established after comparisons between and within groups, assuming differences in fatigue based on differences in circumstances and/or activity level. Convergent validity was investigated by correlating the MFI-scales with a Visual Analogue Scale measuring fatigue (0.22 < r < 0.78). Results, by and large, support the validity of the MFI.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet
                Lancet
                Lancet (London, England)
                Elsevier
                0140-6736
                1474-547X
                24 October 2020
                24 October 2020
                : 396
                : 10259
                : 1353-1361
                Affiliations
                [a ]Division of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
                [b ]Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
                [c ]Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK
                [d ]Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
                [e ]Department of Anaesthesia, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, UK
                [f ]Department of Renal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK
                [g ]NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
                [h ]Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
                [i ]School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
                [j ]University Department of Vascular Surgery, Birmingham University, Solihull Hospital, Solihull, UK
                [k ]Department of Cardiology (CVK), Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, and German Centre for Cardiovascular Research partner site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
                [l ]Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Prof Toby Richards, Division of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia toby.richards@ 123456uwa.edu.au
                Article
                S0140-6736(20)31539-7
                10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31539-7
                7581899
                32896294
                4d84525e-20eb-4b12-b0bd-3525ad011207
                © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Articles

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article