Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society ureteroscopy global study.

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Ureteroscopy has traditionally been the preferred approach for treatment of distal and midureteral stones, with shock wave lithotripsy used for proximal ureteral stones.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Eur. Urol.

Title: European urology

ISSN (Electronic): 1873-7560

ISSN (Print): 0302-2838

Publication date (Electronic): Jul 2014

Volume: 66

Issue: 1

Affiliations

[1 ] Department of Urology, Clínica La Luz, Madrid, Spain.

[2 ] Department of Urology, Fredericia Hospital (part of Hospital Littlebelt, University of Southern Denmark), Fredericia, Denmark.

[3 ] Department of Urology, Prof. Dr. Th. Burghele Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania.

[4 ] Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

[5 ] Department of Urology, Athens Medical School, Laiko Hospital, Athens, Greece.

[6 ] Department of Urology, Shyam Urosurgical, Ahmedabad, India.

[7 ] Department of Urology, Bilim University, Istanbul, Turkey.

[8 ] Department of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.j.delarosette@amc.uva.nl.

Article

Publisher Item ID: S0302-2838(14)00023-2

DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.011

PubMed ID: 24507782

SO-VID: 4db840c2-fb19-441c-ae6c-02c2b09a19ec

History

Keywords: Complications,Treatment outcome,Ureteral stones,Ureteroscopy

Data availability:

Keywords: Complications, Treatment outcome, Ureteral stones, Ureteroscopy

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Cited by 49

See all cited by