There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
http://publicationethics.org
The basic tenet of good publication practices is faith and confidence in the peer
review process. In order to select the best quality of articles, the review and publication
process has to be transparent, methodical and impartial. All stages of this process
are explicitly built on ethical principles and informed decisions, most of which are
based on the distinctive vision of the editors. The quality of research published
in a journal depends in turn on the trust that researchers, authors and readers repose
in the editorial policies of the journal. The influence of powerful financial and
intellectual interests sometimes comes in the way of these policies. This makes it
imperative to have clear guidelines and unambiguous policies in order to ensure the
ethical treatment of all aspects of the editorial and publication processes.
What started out as an informal group of editors concerned at the increasing instances
of authors flaunting scientific integrity evolved later into the Committee on Publication
Ethics (COPE) in 1997. COPE is now a registered British charitable organization and
has a number of leading journals and editors as its members. Editors of scientific
journals are encouraged to submit issues relating to the integrity of the work submitted
for publication and the website (http://publicationethics.org) acts as a forum for
these wide-ranging discussions and their possible redressal. The summaries of all
cases and their outcomes are posted on the website and act as a guide for authors
and editors, alike.
Flowcharts on handling common publication lapses are present in a section of the website.
Seventeen different issues pertaining to misconduct are available. They provide solutions
to problems such as redundant publication, plagiarism, fabrications of data, authorship
problems, undisclosed conflict of interest, complaints against authors and reviewers
and various types of ethical indiscretions.
The section on guidelines has the code of conduct for its member editors, which encourages
them to work for improving the journal by ensuring adherence to quality, freedom of
expression, maintenance of integrity and that of adopting a stance of not letting
profits come in the way of achieving high intellectual standards. The code also advises
the members to meet the needs of the authors and readers and to publish corrections,
retractions and apologies, if required.
The research section has details of the work carried out at different places in terms
of publication misconduct by grants provided by COPE. Projects on detecting plagiarism,
author’s awareness about publication ethics have been successfully completed.
The Forum is perhaps the most interesting section of the website. It hosts all Annual
Reports between 1998 and 2008. These reports provide a summary of individual cases
linked to the actual description of problem, the advice by COPE, follow-up by the
journal and the resolution. The Cases section contains an indexed version of all cases
submitted to COPE. These reports and cases should be essential reading for all aspiring
authors and those interested in implementing good publication practices.
The Seminar section lists the content from annual seminars organized by COPE. A perusal
of the contents reveals a number of interesting cases; the 2010 seminars on plagiarism
in the electronic age, cultural differences in plagiarism and screening for plagiarism
using a web-based service are remarkable eye-openers.
The publication ethics blog allows members to post comments and to engage in discussion
on varied relevant topics. The newsletter of COPE called ‘Ethical Editing’ is also
available for download. In addition to news and reports of meetings, it has general
articles which tend to demystify some of the more daunting aspects of publication
ethics.
The contents of the website are not for the newbie, there is a distance education
course in the offing but its details are not available. The problem of misconduct
in scientific publication in the developing countries as a unique identity does not
find a place on the website. Indian journal members are primarily those from large
publishing houses. Smaller Indian journals have not been represented despite a discounted
membership rate.
The overall accent of the website is to create awareness about publication ethics
and it succeeds in doing so by its content. However, most of the text is uninspiring
and only a diehard editor will go through the website in a concerted effort to find
solutions. A more pleasing layout with visual appeal and ease of navigation would
be more appropriate for such a topical website.
Title:
Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics
Publisher:
Medknow Publications
(India
)
ISSN
(Print):
0976-500X
ISSN
(Electronic):
0976-5018
Publication date
(Print):
Jul-Dec 2010
Volume: 1
Issue: 2
Pages: 124-125
Affiliations
Section Editor, JPP
Author notes
Address for correspondence: Jatinder Singh, Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Amritsar,
India. Email:
singh.jatinder@
123456gmail.com
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction
in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.