10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Significant antitumor activity for low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) with pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) immediately following progression on PD1 Ab in melanoma (MEL) in a phase II trial.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          10004

          Background: Combination PD1 + CTLA4 antibodies (Abs) shows greater response rate (RR) versus PD1 Ab alone in MEL, but RR after initial PD1 Ab progression awaits robust investigation. CTLA4 Ab alone after PD1 Ab progression has a historical RR of 13%. We report final results of the first prospective clinical trial evaluating IPI 1mg/kg + PEMBRO immediately following progression on PD1 Ab (NCT02743819). Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced MEL, no prior CTLA4 Ab for metastatic disease, and who had progressed on PD1 Ab as immediately prior therapy (or non-CTLA4 Ab combination) were eligible. Pts received PEMBRO 200 mg + IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W for 4 doses, then PEMBRO alone for up to two years. The primary endpoint was RR by irRECIST. After 35 pts, the study met its primary endpoint with 10/22 evaluable pts achieving a response. The trial was expanded to enroll a total of 70 pts in open-label accrual to further describe the RR for this regimen in an exploratory fashion. The data analysis cutoff was January 30, 2020. Results: 67/70 accrued patients were evaluable for treatment response. Prior treatments included 60 on PD1 Ab alone and 10 on PD1 Ab-based combinations. Of these, 10 pts had progressed in the adjuvant setting. Median length of treatment on prior PD1 Ab was 4.8 months. Response assessments included 4 CR, 17 PR and 16 SD for a RR of 31% (21/67) in evaluable pts, and 30% (21/70) in all enrolled pts. 4 pts with a PR and 6 with SD had unconfirmed responses making the irRECIST response rate 25% (17/67) and 24% (17/70) among evaluable and enrolled pts, respectively. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.7 mo (95% CI: 2.8-8.3) and PFS at six months was 45% (95% CI: 33%-57%). 15/70 (21%) pts experienced ≥ grade 3-4 drug-related AEs, the most common being diarrhea, rash and transaminase elevation. PD-L1 positive vs negative status from historical tumor specimens did not associate with RR. Conclusions: This is the largest prospective study of IPI 1mg/kg + PEMBRO, demonstrating significant antitumor activity and tolerability in MEL post-PD1 Ab. Clinical trial information: NCT02743819.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          May 20 2020
          May 20 2020
          : 38
          : 15_suppl
          : 10004
          Affiliations
          [1 ]University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL;
          [2 ]University of Pittsburgh, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA;
          [3 ]VCU Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA;
          [4 ]Illinois CancerCare, Peoria, IL;
          [5 ]The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL;
          [6 ]University of Chicago, Chicago, IL;
          [7 ]University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL;
          [8 ]Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL;
          [9 ]Oncology Specialists, SC, Park Ridge, IL;
          [10 ]NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL;
          [11 ]Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL;
          [12 ]Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL;
          [13 ]H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL;
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.10004
          4dfb04b3-9f07-4674-bfc0-b5e8bf79dc86
          © 2020
          History

          Quantitative & Systems biology,Biophysics
          Quantitative & Systems biology, Biophysics

          Comments

          Comment on this article