75
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Publish your biodiversity research with us!

      Submit your article here.

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      GenSeq: An updated nomenclature and ranking for genetic sequences from type and non-type sources

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract

          An improved and expanded nomenclature for genetic sequences is introduced that corresponds with a ranking of the reliability of the taxonomic identification of the source specimens. This nomenclature is an advancement of the “Genetypes” naming system, which some have been reluctant to adopt because of the use of the “type” suffix in the terminology. In the new nomenclature, genetic sequences are labeled “genseq,” followed by a reliability ranking (e.g., 1 if the sequence is from a primary type), followed by the name of the genes from which the sequences were derived (e.g., genseq-1 16S, COI). The numbered suffix provides an indication of the likely reliability of taxonomic identification of the voucher. Included in this ranking system, in descending order of taxonomic reliability, are the following: sequences from primary types – “genseq-1,” secondary types – “genseq-2,” collection-vouchered topotypes – “genseq-3,” collection-vouchered non-types – “genseq-4,” and non-types that lack specimen vouchers but have photo vouchers – “genseq-5.” To demonstrate use of the new nomenclature, we review recently published new-species descriptions in the ichthyological literature that include DNA data and apply the GenSeq nomenclature to sequences referenced in those publications. We encourage authors to adopt the GenSeq nomenclature (note capital “G” and “S” when referring to the nomenclatural program) to provide a searchable tag (e.g., “genseq”; note lowercase “g” and “s” when referring to sequences) for genetic sequences from types and other vouchered specimens. Use of the new nomenclature and ranking system will improve integration of molecular phylogenetics and biological taxonomy and enhance the ability of researchers to assess the reliability of sequence data. We further encourage authors to update sequence information on databases such as GenBank whenever nomenclatural changes are made.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          GenBank

          GenBank (R) is a comprehensive database that contains publicly available DNA sequences for more than 205 000 named organisms, obtained primarily through submissions from individual laboratories and batch submissions from large-scale sequencing projects. Most submissions are made using the Web-based BankIt or standalone Sequin programs and accession numbers are assigned by GenBank staff upon receipt. Daily data exchange with the EMBL Data Library in Europe and the DNA Data Bank of Japan ensures worldwide coverage. GenBank is accessible through NCBI's retrieval system, Entrez, which integrates data from the major DNA and protein sequence databases along with taxonomy, genome, mapping, protein structure and domain information, and the biomedical journal literature via PubMed. BLAST provides sequence similarity searches of GenBank and other sequence databases. Complete bimonthly releases and daily updates of the GenBank database are available by FTP. To access GenBank and its related retrieval and analysis services, go to the NCBI Homepage at .
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Phylogenies without roots? A plea for the use of vouchers in molecular phylogenetic studies.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              So Many Fishes, So Little Time: An Overview of Recent Ichthyological Discovery in Continental Waters

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Zookeys
                Zookeys
                ZooKeys
                ZooKeys
                Pensoft Publishers
                1313-2989
                1313-2970
                2013
                1 November 2013
                : 346
                : 29-41
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Museum of Natural Science, Ichthyology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, 119 Foster Hall, Baton Rouge, LA USA
                [2 ]Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
                [3 ]National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC USA
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Prosanta Chakrabarty ( prosanta@ 123456lsu.edu )

                Academic editor: Richard Pyle

                Article
                10.3897/zookeys.346.5753
                3821064
                4e09e0cd-6538-4b23-b309-e777944d3945
                Prosanta Chakrabarty, Melanie Warren, Lawrence M. Page, Carole C. Baldwin

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 7 June 2013
                : 15 October 2013
                Categories
                Article

                Animal science & Zoology
                genbank,genetics,molecular phylogenetics,systematics,taxonomy
                Animal science & Zoology
                genbank, genetics, molecular phylogenetics, systematics, taxonomy

                Comments

                Comment on this article