90
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Clinical Significance of Symptoms in Smokers with Preserved Pulmonary Function

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          Currently, the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires a ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) of less than 0.70 as assessed by spirometry after bronchodilator use. However, many smokers who do not meet this definition have respiratory symptoms.

          METHODS

          We conducted an observational study involving 2736 current or former smokers and controls who had never smoked and measured their respiratory symptoms using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT; scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms). We examined whether current or former smokers who had preserved pulmonary function as assessed by spirometry (FEV 1:FVC ≥0.70 and an FVC above the lower limit of the normal range after bronchodilator use) and had symptoms (CAT score, ≥10) had a higher risk of respiratory exacerbations than current or former smokers with preserved pulmonary function who were asymptomatic (CAT score, <10) and whether those with symptoms had different findings from the asymptomatic group with respect to the 6-minute walk distance, lung function, or high-resolution computed tomographic (HRCT) scan of the chest.

          RESULTS

          Respiratory symptoms were present in 50% of current or former smokers with preserved pulmonary function. The mean (±SD) rate of respiratory exacerbations among symptomatic current or former smokers was significantly higher than the rates among asymptomatic current or former smokers and among controls who never smoked (0.27± 0.67 vs. 0.08±0.31 and 0.03±0.21 events, respectively, per year; P<0.001 for both comparisons). Symptomatic current or former smokers, regardless of history of asthma, also had greater limitation of activity, slightly lower FEV 1, FVC, and inspiratory capacity, and greater airway-wall thickening without emphysema according to HRCT than did asymptomatic current or former smokers. Among symptomatic current or former smokers, 42% used bronchodilators and 23% used inhaled glucocorticoids.

          CONCLUSIONS

          Although they do not meet the current criteria for COPD, symptomatic current or former smokers with preserved pulmonary function have exacerbations, activity limitation, and evidence of airway disease. They currently use a range of respiratory medications without any evidence base. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health; SPIROMICS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01969344.)

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Physiology of obesity and effects on lung function.

          In obese people, the presence of adipose tissue around the rib cage and abdomen and in the visceral cavity loads the chest wall and reduces functional residual capacity (FRC). The reduction in FRC and in expiratory reserve volume is detectable, even at a modest increase in weight. However, obesity has little direct effect on airway caliber. Spirometric variables decrease in proportion to lung volumes, but are rarely below the normal range, even in the extremely obese, while reductions in expiratory flows and increases in airway resistance are largely normalized by adjusting for lung volumes. Nevertheless, the reduction in FRC has consequences for other aspects of lung function. A low FRC increases the risk of both expiratory flow limitation and airway closure. Marked reductions in expiratory reserve volume may lead to abnormalities in ventilation distribution, with closure of airways in the dependent zones of the lung and ventilation perfusion inequalities. Greater airway closure during tidal breathing is associated with lower arterial oxygen saturation in some subjects, even though lung CO-diffusing capacity is normal or increased in the obese. Bronchoconstriction has the potential to enhance the effects of obesity on airway closure and thus on ventilation distribution. Thus obesity has effects on lung function that can reduce respiratory well-being, even in the absence of specific respiratory disease, and may also exaggerate the effects of existing airway disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical and Radiologic Disease in Smokers With Normal Spirometry.

            Airflow obstruction on spirometry is universally used to define chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and current or former smokers without airflow obstruction may assume that they are disease free.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Semiparametric regression for the mean and rate functions of recurrent events

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0255562
                5985
                N Engl J Med
                N. Engl. J. Med.
                The New England journal of medicine
                0028-4793
                1533-4406
                22 July 2016
                12 May 2016
                12 November 2016
                : 374
                : 19
                : 1811-1821
                Affiliations
                Cardiovascular Research Institute (P.G.W., S.C.L.) and the Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep, and Allergy (P.G.W., S.A.C., S.C.L.), University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco; the Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Columbia University Medical Center (R.G.B.), and the Department of Medicine, Weill–Cornell Medical College (F.J.M.) — both in New York; the Department of Medicine, Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine Research, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem (E.B.), and the Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (D.C., N.A.G.) — both in North Carolina; the Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System (J.L.C.), and the Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan (J.L.C., M.K.H.) — both in Ann Arbor; the Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore (N.N.H.); the Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City (E.A.H.); the Department of Medicine, University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics, Salt Lake City (R.E.K., R.P.); the Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles (E.K., D.P.T.); the Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (S.R.); and the Clinical Discovery Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (S.R.).
                Author notes
                [*]

                A complete list of the investigators in the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS) is provided in the Supplementary Appendix, available at NEJM.org.

                Address reprint requests to Dr. Woodruff at the University of California at San Francisco, Box 0130, Rm. HSE 1305, 513 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, CA 94143, or at prescott.woodruff@ 123456ucsf.edu .
                Article
                PMC4968204 PMC4968204 4968204 nihpa802615
                10.1056/NEJMoa1505971
                4968204
                27168432
                4e0e5a91-aab1-4f53-828f-4f922090f2a4
                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article