55
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Psycho-Education Intervention by Midwives in Reducing Childbirth Fear in Pregnant Women

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Childbirth fear is associated with increased obstetric interventions and poor emotional and psychological health for women. The purpose of this study is to test an antenatal psycho-education intervention by midwives in reducing women's childbirth fear.

          Methods

          Women ( n = 1,410) attending three hospitals in South East Queensland, Australia, were recruited into the BELIEF trial. Participants reporting high fear were randomly allocated to intervention ( n = 170) or control ( n = 169) groups. All women received a decision-aid booklet on childbirth choices. The telephone counseling intervention was offered at 24 and 34 weeks of pregnancy. The control group received usual care offered by public maternity services. Primary outcome was reduction in childbirth fear (WDEQ-A) from second trimester to 36 weeks’ gestation. Secondary outcomes were improved childbirth self-efficacy, and reduced decisional conflict and depressive symptoms. Demographic, obstetric & psychometric measures were administered at recruitment, and 36 weeks of pregnancy.

          Results

          There were significant differences between groups on postintervention scores for fear of birth ( p < 0.001) and childbirth self-efficacy ( p = 0.002). Decisional conflict and depressive symptoms reduced but were not significant.

          Conclusion

          Psycho-education by trained midwives was effective in reducing high childbirth fear levels and increasing childbirth confidence in pregnant women. Improving antenatal emotional well-being may have wider positive social and maternity care implications for optimal childbirth experiences.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Antenatal fear of childbirth and its association with subsequent caesarean section and experience of childbirth.

          To investigate the prevalence of fear of childbirth in a nationwide sample and its association with subsequent rates of caesarean section and overall experience of childbirth. A prospective study using between-group comparisons. About 600 antenatal clinics in Sweden. A total of 2,662 women recruited at their first visit to an antenatal clinic during three predetermined weeks spread over 1 year. Postal questionnaires at 16 weeks of gestation (mean) and 2 months postpartum. Women with fear of childbirth, defined as 'very negative' feelings when thinking about the delivery in second trimester and/or having undergone counselling because of fear of childbirth later in pregnancy, were compared with those in the reference group without these characteristics. Elective and emergency caesarean section and overall childbirth experience. In total 97 women (3.6%) had very negative feelings and about half of them subsequently underwent counselling. In addition, 193 women (7.2%) who initially had more positive feelings underwent counselling later in pregnancy. In women who underwent counselling, fear of childbirth was associated with a three to six times higher rate of elective caesarean sections but not with higher rates of emergency caesarean section or negative childbirth experience. Very negative feelings without counselling were not associated with an increased caesarean section rate but were associated with a negative birth experience. At least 10% of pregnant women in Sweden suffer from fear of childbirth. Fear of childbirth in combination with counselling may increase the rate of elective caesarean sections, whereas fear without treatment may have a negative impact on the subsequent experience of childbirth.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Women's fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section--a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden.

            To investigate Swedish women's level of antenatal fear of childbirth at various gestational ages, and factors associated with intense fear and with preference for cesarean section. A cross-sectional study. All antenatal clinics in four geographical areas. Thousand six hundred and thirty-five pregnant women at various gestational ages recruited during September-October 2006. A questionnaire completed at the antenatal clinic. The women reported their appraisal of the approaching delivery according to the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ). The level of fear of childbirth and preferred mode of delivery. Mean W-DEQ score was 62.8. The prevalence of intense fear of childbirth (W-DEQ score > or =85) was 15.8% and very intense fear (tocophobia) (W-DEQ score > or =100) 5.7%. Nulliparous women had a higher mean score than parous women, but more parous women reported an intense fear. Preference for cesarean section was associated with fear of childbirth (OR 11.79, 6.1-22.59 for nulliparous and OR 8.32, 4.36-15.85 for parous women) and for parous women also with a previous cesarean section (OR 18.54, 9.55-35.97), or an instrumental vaginal delivery (OR 2.34, 1.02-5.34). The level of fear of childbirth was not associated with the gestational age. When a woman requests a cesarean section, both primary fear of birth and traumatic childbirth experiences need to be considered and dealt with. The W-DEQ can be used at any time during pregnancy in order to identify pregnant women who suffer from intense fear of childbirth.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fear of childbirth and duration of labour: a study of 2206 women with intended vaginal delivery.

              To assess the association between fear of childbirth and duration of labour. A prospective study of women from 32 weeks of gestation through to delivery. Akershus University Hospital, Norway. A total of 2206 pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy and intended vaginal delivery during the period 2008-10. Fear of childbirth was assessed by the Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire (W-DEQ) version A at 32 weeks of gestation, and defined as a W-DEQ sum score ≥ 85. Information on labour duration, use of epidural analgesia and mode of delivery was obtained from the maternal ward electronic birth records. Labour duration in hours: from 3-4 cm cervical dilatation and three uterine contractions per 10 minutes lasting ≥ 1 minute, until delivery of the child. Fear of childbirth (W-DEQ sum score ≥ 85) was present in 7.5% (165) of women. Labour duration was significantly longer in women with fear of childbirth compared with women with no such fear using a linear regression model (crude unstandardized coefficient 1.54; 95% confidence interval 0.87-2.22, corresponding to a difference of 1 hour and 32 minutes). After adjustment for parity, counselling for pregnancy concern, epidural analgesia, labour induction, labour augmentation, emergency caesarean delivery, instrumental vaginal delivery, offspring birthweight and maternal age, the difference attenuated, but remained statistically significant (adjusted unstandardized coefficient 0.78; 95% confidence interval 0.20-1.35, corresponding to a 47-minute difference). Duration of labour was longer in women with fear of childbirth than in women without fear of childbirth. © 2012 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2012 RCOG.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Birth
                Birth
                birt
                Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)
                BlackWell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                0730-7659
                1523-536X
                December 2014
                09 October 2014
                : 41
                : 4
                : 384-394
                Affiliations
                Griffith Health Institute, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Griffith University Brisbane, Qld, Australia
                Gold Coast University Hospital Parkwood, Qld, Australia
                University of Melbourne Melbourne, Vic, Australia
                Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to Jocelyn Toohill, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Griffith University, Logan Campus, University Drive, Meadowbrook. Qld 4131, Australia.

                Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Controlled Trials Registry ACTRN12612000526875.

                Article
                10.1111/birt.12136
                4257571
                25303111
                4e310e16-f244-41e3-bebf-e0d734069c13
                © 2014 The Authors. Birth Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 23 August 2014
                Categories
                Articles

                childbirth fear,midwife counseling,psycho-education,childbirth self-efficacy,depression,decisional conflict,rct

                Comments

                Comment on this article