Efecto del uso de ultrasonido en tiempo real en la inserción del catéter venoso central

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Resumen ANTECEDENTES: la colocación del catéter venoso central es una parte esencial en el tratamiento de los pacientes en muchos escenarios clínicos. El ultrasonido en tiempo real se ha convertido en una herramienta invaluable debido a su seguridad, disponibilidad y proporciona información detallada en relación con la anatomía de los órganos internos, en la colocación de catéteres venosos centrales favorece las tasas de éxito y disminuye el número de complicaciones. OBJETIVO: determinar si la colocación de catéter venoso central guiado por ultrasonido en tiempo real disminuye el número de complicaciones en comparación con la técnica por referencias anatómicas. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: estudio observacional, ambispectivo, longitudinal en el que se seleccionaron adultos mayores de 18 años de edad que requirieron un catéter venoso central durante su hospitalización en el Hospital General Naval de Alta Especialidad (HOSGENAES) guiado por ultrasonido en tiempo real y por referencias anatómicas de enero de 2014 a febrero de 2016. Los datos se recabaron de los expedientes clínicos siempre y cuando estuvieran completos. Las variables observadas fueron el tipo de complicaciones, tipo de catéter, sitio de inserción, operador experto, servicio que instaló los catéteres venosos centrales, si fue de primera vez o subsecuente, número de intentos, accesos exitosos y los diagnósticos de ingreso, edad, género e índice de masa corporal. RESULTADOS: se incluyeron 464 pacientes de los que 351 (76%) fueron guiados por referencias anatómicas y en 113 (24%) por ultrasonido en tiempo real. Se reportaron 211 complicaciones, 84% en el grupo de referencias anatómicas y 16% en el grupo de ultrasonido en tiempo real con razón de momios (OR) de 2.36. La complicación más frecuente fue la de tipo mecánica, principalmente la mala colocación, en el grupo de referencias anatómicas representó 51% versus 12% en el grupo de ultrasonido en tiempo real con OR de 9.5. El 100% de los catéteres venosos centrales guiados por ultrasonido en tiempo real fueron exitosos vs 87% de los guiados por referencias anatómicas. CONCLUSIONES: el ultrasonido en tiempo real mejora las tasas de éxito, reduce el número de intentos y disminuye las complicaciones asociadas con la inserción de un catéter venoso central.

Translated abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND: The placement of central venous catheter (CVC) is an essential part in the management of patients in many clinical scenarios. Ultrasonography in real time (USRT) has become an invaluable tool because of its safety and availability and provides detailed information regarding the anatomy of the internal organs, in the placement of central venous catheters (CVCs) encouraging success rates and decreasing the number of complications. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the placement of central venous catheter guided by real-time ultrasound decreases the number of complications compared with the technique for anatomical references. MATERIAL AND METHOD: An observational, retrospective and prospective, longitudinal study was done selecting adults over 18 years old who required a CVC during their hospitalization at the Naval General Hospital of High Specialty (HOSGENAES), Mexico City, led by USRT and anatomical references from January 2014 to February 2016. Data were gathered from the files provided they were complete. The variables observed were the kind of complications, type of catheter insertion site, skilled operator, service that installed the CVCs, if it was first or subsequent, number of attempts, successful access and admission diagnoses, age, gender and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-four patients were included, of which 351 (76%) were guided by anatomical and 113 (24%) by USTR references. A total of 211 complications occurred; 84% in the group of anatomical references and 16% were reported in the group USTR with OR of 2.36. The most common complication was mainly mechanical type misplacement accounting for 51% in the group of anatomical references versus 12% in the USRT with OR of 9.5375. The 100% of CVCs guided by USTR were successful vs 87% guided by anatomical references. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography in real time improves success rates, reduces the number of attempts and reduces complications associated with the insertion of a central venous catheter.

Related collections

Most cited references 26

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis.

Daniel Hind, Neill W Calvert, Richard McWilliams … (2003)

To assess the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound guided central venous cannulation. 15 electronic bibliographic databases, covering biomedical, science, social science, health economics, and grey literature. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Populations Patients scheduled for central venous access. INTERVENTION REVIEWED: Guidance using real time two dimensional ultrasonography or Doppler needles and probes compared with the anatomical landmark method of cannulation. Risk of failed catheter placement (primary outcome), risk of complications from placement, risk of failure on first attempt at placement, number of attempts to successful catheterisation, and time (seconds) to successful catheterisation. 18 trials (1646 participants) were identified. Compared with the landmark method, real time two dimensional ultrasound guidance for cannulating the internal jugular vein in adults was associated with a significantly lower failure rate both overall (relative risk 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.33) and on the first attempt (0.59, 0.39 to 0.88). Limited evidence favoured two dimensional ultrasound guidance for subclavian vein and femoral vein procedures in adults (0.14, 0.04 to 0.57 and 0.29, 0.07 to 1.21, respectively). Three studies in infants confirmed a higher success rate with two dimensional ultrasonography for internal jugular procedures (0.15, 0.03 to 0.64). Doppler guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein in adults was more successful than the landmark method (0.39, 0.17 to 0.92), but the landmark method was more successful for subclavian vein procedures (1.48, 1.03 to 2.14). No significant difference was found between these techniques for cannulation of the internal jugular vein in infants. An indirect comparison of relative risks suggested that two dimensional ultrasonography would be more successful than Doppler guidance for subclavian vein procedures in adults (0.09, 0.02 to 0.38). Evidence supports the use of two dimensional ultrasonography for central venous cannulation.

0 comments Cited 178 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial.

B Raffy, J Y Lefrant, J-P Rigaud … (2001)

Whether venous catheterization at the femoral site is associated with an increased risk of complications compared with that at the subclavian site is debated. To compare mechanical, infectious, and thrombotic complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization. Concealed, randomized controlled clinical trial conducted between December 1997 and July 2000 at 8 intensive care units (ICUs) in France. Two hundred eighty-nine adult patients receiving a first central venous catheter. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo central venous catheterization at the femoral site (n = 145) or subclavian site (n = 144). Rate and severity of mechanical, infectious, and thrombotic complications, compared by catheterization site in 289, 270, and 223 patients, respectively. Femoral catheterization was associated with a higher incidence rate of overall infectious complications (19.8% vs 4.5%; P<.001; incidence density of 20 vs 3.7 per 1000 catheter-days) and of major infectious complications (clinical sepsis with or without bloodstream infection, 4.4% vs 1.5%; P =.07; incidence density of 4.5 vs 1.2 per 1000 catheter-days), as well as of overall thrombotic complications (21.5% vs 1.9%; P<.001) and complete thrombosis of the vessel (6% vs 0%; P =.01); rates of overall and major mechanical complications were similar between the 2 groups (17.3% vs 18.8 %; P =.74 and 1.4% vs 2.8%; P =.44, respectively). Risk factors for mechanical complications were duration of insertion (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.08 per additional minute; P<.001); insertion in 2 of the centers (OR, 4.52; 95% CI, 1.81-11.23; P =.001); and insertion during the night (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.04-4.08; P =.03). The only factor associated with infectious complications was femoral catheterization (hazard ratio [HR], 4.83; 95% CI, 1.96-11.93; P<.001); antibiotic administration via the catheter decreased risk of infectious complications (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.18-0.93; P =.03). Femoral catheterization was the only risk factor for thrombotic complications (OR, 14.42; 95% CI, 3.33-62.57; P<.001). Femoral venous catheterization is associated with a greater risk of infectious and thrombotic complications than subclavian catheterization in ICU patients.

0 comments Cited 166 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature.

C Gonzales, Gwendalyn J. Randolph, C Pribble … (1996)

To evaluate the effect of real-time ultrasound guidance using a regular or Doppler ultrasound technique for placement of central venous catheters. We searched for published and unpublished research using MEDLINE, citation review of relevant primary and review articles, conference abstracts, personal files, and contact with expert informants. From a pool of 208 randomized, controlled trials of venous and arterial catheter management, eight published randomized, controlled trials were identified. In duplicate, independently, we abstracted data on the population, intervention, outcome, and methodologic quality. Ultrasound guidance significantly decreases internal jugular and subclavian catheter placement failure (relative risk 0.32; 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.55), decreases complications during catheter placement (relative risk 0.22; 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.45), and decreases the need for multiple catheter placement attempts (relative risk 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.79) when compared with the standard landmark placement technique. When used for vessel location and catheter placement real-time, ultrasound guidance or Doppler ultrasound guidance improves success rates and decreases the complications associated with internal jugular and subclavian venous catheter placement.