2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A systematic review of sugammadex vs neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We reviewed systematically sugammadex vs neostigmine for reversing neuromuscular blockade. We included 17 randomised controlled trials with 1553 participants. Sugammadex reduced all signs of residual postoperative paralysis, relative risk (95% CI) 0.46 (0.29-0.71), p = 0.0004 and minor respiratory events, relative risk (95% CI) 0.51 (0.32-0.80), p = 0.0034. There was no difference in critical respiratory events, relative risk (95% CI) 0.13 (0.02-1.06), p = 0.06. Sugammadex reduced drug-related side-effects, relative risk (95% CI) 0.72 (0.54-0.95), p = 0.02. There was no difference in the rate of postoperative nausea or the rate of postoperative vomiting, relative risk (95% CI) 0.94 (0.79-1.13), p = 0.53, and 0.87 (0.65-1.17), p = 0.36 respectively.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Anaesthesia
          Anaesthesia
          Wiley-Blackwell
          1365-2044
          0003-2409
          Dec 2015
          : 70
          : 12
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Anaesthesia, Hospital Universitario la Paz, Madrid, Spain.
          [2 ] Department of Anaesthesia, Complutense University of Madrid, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
          [3 ] Department of Anaesthesia, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.
          [4 ] Department of Anaesthesia, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
          [5 ] Department of Consultant Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
          [6 ] Department of Colorectal Surgery, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
          [7 ] Department of Anaesthesia, Complutense University of Madrid, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
          Article
          10.1111/anae.13277
          26558858
          4e60dc01-531e-4f08-8140-ec7681650d9c
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article