9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Post‐traumatic stress symptoms among medical rescue workers exposed to COVID‐19 in Japan

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The novel coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) has spread throughout the world. At an early stage in Japan, health‐care professionals who belong to the Disaster Medical Assistance Team (DMAT) or the Disaster Psychiatric Assistance Team (DPAT) were engaged in rescue activities outside hospitals. DMAT members engaged in quarantine and treatment and DPAT members provided mental health care for people who might have had COVID‐19. This included quarantine and treatment for people infected with COVID‐19 on a cruise ship, the Diamond Princess. 1 It is well‐known that mental health problems have occurred among health‐care professionals responding to COVID‐19. 2 , 3 Previous studies have reported mental health problems and associated factors among health‐care professionals from infectious disease outbreaks. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 However, no studies have examined associated factors with post‐traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) among health‐care professionals who have been deployed to activities of emerging infectious diseases outside hospitals. The present study examined factors associated with PTSS among DMAT and DPAT members who have been deployed to COVID‐19‐related activities outside hospitals. DMAT and DPAT are trained medical teams with the mobility to work in an acute phase of disaster. DMAT and DPAT members (physicians, nurses, and operational coordination staff) were dispatched to COVID‐19‐related activities commencing 1 February 2020; DPAT activities ended on 6 March, and DMAT activities ended on 9 March. The recruited participants in this study, including all DMAT and DPAT members who were deployed to COVID‐19‐related activities, met the following inclusion criteria: (i) aged 18 years or older; (ii) native Japanese speaker or non‐native speaker with Japanese conversational abilities; and (iii) physically and psychologically capable of understanding and providing consent for study participation. This cross‐sectional, Internet‐based survey was conducted from 11 March to 2 April 2020. A written guide to this study was posted to the mailing list by the DMAT office or DPAT office. Participants accessed the URL in the written guide, read a detailed explanation of the study, and responded to a consent form and a questionnaire by 2 April. Outcomes of this study were evidence of PTSS. PTSS was assessed by the Impact of Event Scale‐Revised (IES‐R). Independent variables were selected based on previous studies. Peritraumatic distress was assessed by the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI), and perceived stress specific to the emerging infectious disease was assessed by the Japanese version of Stress‐Related Questions (SRQ). 8 The SRQ consists of four factors (anxiety about infection, exhaustion, workload, and feeling of being protected) and includes16 items. 5 The validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the IES‐R, the PDI, and the SRQ have been confirmed. 5 , 9 , 10 In addition, participants were asked about the variables that were identified in a previous study 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 or from our interviews with DMAT and DPAT members as associated factors for PTSS. This study was ethically approved by the research ethics committee of the Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine at the University of Tokyo (No. 2019164NI) and the research ethics committee of the National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center (No. 2019–19). We analyzed the dataset of participants who completed all questions of the self‐report questionnaire. Univariate and multiple linear regression analyses were used to examine the association of independent variables with PTSS. All analyses were conducted using spss Version 22.0 J for Windows (SPSS, Tokyo, Japan). Among 807 DMAT and DPAT members who were deployed to COVID‐19‐related activities, 414 agreed to participate in this study, and 331 (41.0%) completed all questions. Demographic characteristics are shown in Table S1. Among the participants, 105 (31.7%) had had contact with a COVID‐19 patient during deployment. The results of univariate and multiple linear regression analyses about PTSS in the participants are shown in Table 1. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that anxiety about infection assessed by the SRQ, exhaustion assessed by the SRQ, PDI, and being DMAT members were associated with PTSS. The results of a univariate regression analysis of each PDI item showed that items such as “I felt I might pass out” and “I had difficulty controlling my bowel and bladder” were strongly significantly associated with PTSS (Table S2). Table 1 Results of univariate and multiple linear regression analysis in participants (n = 331) for post‐traumatic stress symptoms Univariate regression Multiple linear regression β 95%CI P β 95%CI P Contact with a COVID‐19 patient 0.15 −2.28, 2.59 0.90 −0.49 −2.27, 1.29 0.59 Stress prior to deployment 3.15 0.73, 5.57 0.01 −1.34 −3.24, 0.57 0.17 Adequate food and sleep or rest −5.01 −7.22, −2.79 <0.001 0.16 −1.70, 2.02 0.87 Experience of stress due to lack of sufficient information sharing 3.85 1.52, 6.18 0.001 0.56 −1.26, 2.37 0.55 Troubles at home after deployment 4.84 2.51, 7.16 <0.001 1.83 −0.01, 3,67 0.05 Troubles at workplace after deployment 5.72 3.46, 7.98 <0.001 0.05 −1.81, 1.90 0.96 Opportunities to hear about deployment activities after deployment −3.96 −6.31, −1.61 0.001 −1.53 −3.28, 0.20 0.08 SRQ: Anxiety about infection 0.51 0.24, 0.77 <0.001 −0.26 −0.50, −0.03 0.03 SRQ: Exhaustion 1.59 1.26, 1.92 <0.001 0.78 0.42, 1.14 <0.001 SRQ: Workload 1.95 1.29, 2.61 <0.001 −0.03 −0.66, 0.60 0.94 SRQ: Feeling of being protected −0.92 −1.70, −0.15 0.02 0.27 −0.30, 0.84 0.35 PDI 1.00 0.89, 1.11 <0.001 0.92 0.79, 1.05 <0.001 Age −0.03 −0.16, 0.10 0.61 0.05 −0.05, 0.14 0.33 Sex 0.04 −2.56, 2.65 0.03 −1.04 −2.90, 0.82 0.27 DMAT (Reference) or DPAT −1.41 −4.18, 1.36 0.31 −2.14 −4.16, −0.12 0.04 R 2 0.55 Post‐traumatic stress symptoms were assessed by the Japanese version of the Impact of Event Scale‐Revised. CI, confidence interval; DMAT, Disaster Medical Assistance Team; DPAT, Disaster Psychiatric Assistance Team; PDI, Peritraumatic Distress Inventory; SRQ, Stress‐Related Questions. Although this study has some limitations, such as modest response rate and cross‐sectional design, the findings of the study suggest that physical exhaustion, peritraumatic distress, and activities during deployment were very important as associated factors for PTSS among medical rescue workers. To prevent mental health problems in health‐care professionals dealing with emerging infectious disease, it is essential to give them enough time for self‐care, including allowing time and physical allowances (such as adequate infection‐protection clothing) to use the bathroom. In addition, health‐care professionals may need to have their mental health checked after deployment, especially when they have had physical contact with potential patients with emerging infectious diseases. However, this needs to be further examined because univariate regression analysis did not show significant associations between being DMAT members and PTSS. These findings could be useful for establishing a system for rescue activities for infectious diseases, including COVID‐19, and for preventing mental health problems among health‐care professionals. Disclosure statement The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. All authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest in relation to the subject of the manuscript. Supporting information Table S1 Demographic characteristics of participants. Click here for additional data file. Table S2 Results of univariate regression analysis of each Peritraumatic Distress Inventory item in participants for post‐traumatic stress symptoms. Click here for additional data file.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019

          Key Points Question What factors are associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers in China who are treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Findings In this cross-sectional study of 1257 health care workers in 34 hospitals equipped with fever clinics or wards for patients with COVID-19 in multiple regions of China, a considerable proportion of health care workers reported experiencing symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and distress, especially women, nurses, those in Wuhan, and front-line health care workers directly engaged in diagnosing, treating, or providing nursing care to patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Meaning These findings suggest that, among Chinese health care workers exposed to COVID-19, women, nurses, those in Wuhan, and front-line health care workers have a high risk of developing unfavorable mental health outcomes and may need psychological support or interventions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed

            The 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pneumonia, believed to have originated in a wet market in Wuhan, Hubei province, China at the end of 2019, has gained intense attention nationwide and globally. To lower the risk of further disease transmission, the authority in Wuhan suspended public transport indefinitely from Jan 23, 2020; similar measures were adopted soon in many other cities in China. As of Jan 25, 2020, 30 Chinese provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions covering over 1·3 billion people have initiated first-level responses to major public health emergencies. A range of measures has been urgently adopted,1, 2 such as early identification and isolation of suspected and diagnosed cases, contact tracing and monitoring, collection of clinical data and biological samples from patients, dissemination of regional and national diagnostic criteria and expert treatment consensus, establishment of isolation units and hospitals, and prompt provision of medical supplies and external expert teams to Hubei province. The emergence of the 2019-nCoV pneumonia has parallels with the 2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), which was caused by another coronavirus that killed 349 of 5327 patients with confirmed infection in China. 3 Although the diseases have different clinical presentations,1, 4 the infectious cause, epidemiological features, fast transmission pattern, and insufficient preparedness of health authorities to address the outbreaks are similar. So far, mental health care for the patients and health professionals directly affected by the 2019-nCoV epidemic has been under-addressed, although the National Health Commission of China released the notification of basic principles for emergency psychological crisis interventions for the 2019-nCoV pneumonia on Jan 26, 2020. 5 This notification contained a reference to mental health problems and interventions that occurred during the 2003 SARS outbreak, and mentioned that mental health care should be provided for patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonitis, close contacts, suspected cases who are isolated at home, patients in fever clinics, families and friends of affected people, health professionals caring for infected patients, and the public who are in need. To date, epidemiological data on the mental health problems and psychiatric morbidity of those suspected or diagnosed with the 2019-nCoV and their treating health professionals have not been available; therefore how best to respond to challenges during the outbreak is unknown. The observations of mental health consequences and measures taken during the 2003 SARS outbreak could help inform health authorities and the public to provide mental health interventions to those who are in need. Patients with confirmed or suspected 2019-nCoV may experience fear of the consequences of infection with a potentially fatal new virus, and those in quarantine might experience boredom, loneliness, and anger. Furthermore, symptoms of the infection, such as fever, hypoxia, and cough, as well as adverse effects of treatment, such as insomnia caused by corticosteroids, could lead to worsening anxiety and mental distress. 2019-nCoV has been repeatedly described as a killer virus, for example on WeChat, which has perpetuated the sense of danger and uncertainty among health workers and the public. In the early phase of the SARS outbreak, a range of psychiatric morbidities, including persistent depression, anxiety, panic attacks, psychomotor excitement, psychotic symptoms, delirium, and even suicidality, were reported.6, 7 Mandatory contact tracing and 14 days quarantine, which form part of the public health responses to the 2019-nCoV pneumonia outbreak, could increase patients' anxiety and guilt about the effects of contagion, quarantine, and stigma on their families and friends. Health professionals, especially those working in hospitals caring for people with confirmed or suspected 2019-nCoV pneumonia, are vulnerable to both high risk of infection and mental health problems. They may also experience fear of contagion and spreading the virus to their families, friends, or colleagues. Health workers in a Beijing hospital who were quarantined, worked in high-risk clinical settings such as SARS units, or had family or friends who were infected with SARS, had substantially more post-traumatic stress symptoms than those without these experiences. 8 Health professionals who worked in SARS units and hospitals during the SARS outbreak also reported depression, anxiety, fear, and frustration.6, 9 Despite the common mental health problems and disorders found among patients and health workers in such settings, most health professionals working in isolation units and hospitals do not receive any training in providing mental health care. Timely mental health care needs to be developed urgently. Some methods used in the SARS outbreak could be helpful for the response to the 2019-nCoV outbreak. First, multidisciplinary mental health teams established by health authorities at regional and national levels (including psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, clinical psychologists, and other mental health workers) should deliver mental health support to patients and health workers. Specialised psychiatric treatments and appropriate mental health services and facilities should be provided for patients with comorbid mental disorders. Second, clear communication with regular and accurate updates about the 2019-nCoV outbreak should be provided to both health workers and patients in order to address their sense of uncertainty and fear. Treatment plans, progress reports, and health status updates should be given to both patients and their families. Third, secure services should be set up to provide psychological counselling using electronic devices and applications (such as smartphones and WeChat) for affected patients, as well as their families and members of the public. Using safe communication channels between patients and families, such as smartphone communication and WeChat, should be encouraged to decrease isolation. Fourth, suspected and diagnosed patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonia as well as health professionals working in hospitals caring for infected patients should receive regular clinical screening for depression, anxiety, and suicidality by mental health workers. Timely psychiatric treatments should be provided for those presenting with more severe mental health problems. For most patients and health workers, emotional and behavioural responses are part of an adaptive response to extraordinary stress, and psychotherapy techniques such as those based on the stress-adaptation model might be helpful.7, 10 If psychotropic medications are used, such as those prescribed by psychiatrists for severe psychiatric comorbidities, 6 basic pharmacological treatment principles of ensuring minimum harm should be followed to reduce harmful effects of any interactions with 2019-nCoV and its treatments. In any biological disaster, themes of fear, uncertainty, and stigmatisation are common and may act as barriers to appropriate medical and mental health interventions. Based on experience from past serious novel pneumonia outbreaks globally and the psychosocial impact of viral epidemics, the development and implementation of mental health assessment, support, treatment, and services are crucial and pressing goals for the health response to the 2019-nCoV outbreak. © 2020 VW Pics/Science Photo Library 2020 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review and meta-analysis

              Abstract Objective To examine the psychological effects on clinicians of working to manage novel viral outbreaks, and successful measures to manage stress and psychological distress. Design Rapid review and meta-analysis. Data sources Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed/Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar, searched up to late March 2020. Eligibility criteria for study selection Any study that described the psychological reactions of healthcare staff working with patients in an outbreak of any emerging virus in any clinical setting, irrespective of any comparison with other clinicians or the general population. Results 59 papers met the inclusion criteria: 37 were of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), eight of coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19), seven of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), three each of Ebola virus disease and influenza A virus subtype H1N1, and one of influenza A virus subtype H7N9. Of the 38 studies that compared psychological outcomes of healthcare workers in direct contact with affected patients, 25 contained data that could be combined in a pairwise meta-analysis comparing healthcare workers at high and low risk of exposure. Compared with lower risk controls, staff in contact with affected patients had greater levels of both acute or post-traumatic stress (odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.28 to 2.29) and psychological distress (1.74, 1.50 to 2.03), with similar results for continuous outcomes. These findings were the same as in the other studies not included in the meta-analysis. Risk factors for psychological distress included being younger, being more junior, being the parents of dependent children, or having an infected family member. Longer quarantine, lack of practical support, and stigma also contributed. Clear communication, access to adequate personal protection, adequate rest, and both practical and psychological support were associated with reduced morbidity. Conclusions Effective interventions are available to help mitigate the psychological distress experienced by staff caring for patients in an emerging disease outbreak. These interventions were similar despite the wide range of settings and types of outbreaks covered in this review, and thus could be applicable to the current covid-19 outbreak.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                d-nishi@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp
                Journal
                Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
                Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci
                10.1111/(ISSN)1440-1819
                PCN
                Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
                John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd (Melbourne )
                1323-1316
                1440-1819
                21 July 2020
                : 10.1111/pcn.13092
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Psychiatric Nursing Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan
                [ 2 ] Disaster Medical Assistance Team Secretariat National Hospital Organization Tokyo Japan
                [ 3 ] College of Arts and Sciences J. F. Oberlin University Tokyo Japan
                [ 4 ] Department of Mental Health Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9349-3294
                Article
                PCN13092
                10.1111/pcn.13092
                7404943
                32691955
                4e9727f9-ed66-4926-a5cd-27926393aff7
                © 2020 The Authors Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences © 2020 Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 21 May 2020
                : 03 June 2020
                : 22 June 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Pages: 2, Words: 1690
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100003478;
                Award ID: 19IA201
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor
                Letters to the Editor
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.6 mode:remove_FC converted:05.08.2020

                Comments

                Comment on this article