13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Organization, Discourse Ethics and the Interpretation of “Political CSR”

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherDOAJ
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The political theory of corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims that the current social role of multinational corporations can not be described merely with the classic and economic CSR paradigms which are based on an instrumentalist view where the various corporate stakeholders are considered in decision-making only in as much as they are powerful and able to influence the profit of the corporation (Scherer and Palazzo 2011). Scherer and Palazzo suggest that the CSR activities can be discussed from an alternative perspective. Instead of analyzing corporate responsibility from an economic or an ethical point of view, they propose to embed the CSR debate in the context of the changing order of political institutions. Based on the Habermasian understanding of lifeworld and system world, the dialogues and other corporate social responsibility practices, such as voluntary programs, staff involvement and the use of social media for the purpose of stakeholder relation strengthening, are the solutions that facilitate the possibility to bring together the lifeworld and the system world through the formation of organisation’s internal openness. Thus the initiatives of stakeholder dialogues are intended to ensure that the interest alignment between companies and stakeholder organisations is between two collective agents and occurs along the mutually agreed criteria. When we take a closer look at the corporate practice, in the case of stakeholder involvement, the companies largely determine with which stakeholders to initiate dialogue. Companies that put an emphasis on environmental and social aspects are equally valued by their investors; the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (www.sustainability-indices.com) for example, grades companies from the point of view of sustainability as a stock indicator. Therefore, ethical decisions have strategic purposes too. In order to describe the characteristic patterns of companies, stakeholder relations and social responsibility, the study reviews the related concepts and theories. It then investigates how the theories of social communication can be connected to companies’ activities related to social responsibility and organizing stakeholder relations and how objectives related to the organization of stakeholder relations are present in the strategies and processes of major Hungarian companies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A STAKEHOLDER FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING AND EVALUATING CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                KOME: An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry
                Hungarian Communication Studies Association
                01 July 2017
                : 5
                : 1
                : 1-23
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Corvinus University of Budapest
                Article
                fe9d034b865e467aaa4b41c2195cbd45
                10.17646/KOME.2017.11
                4ea93c30-b562-43f3-8b85-8fba237b2bca

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                Categories
                Communication. Mass media
                P87-96

                Political & Social philosophy,General social science,Theoretical frameworks and disciplines,Communication & Media studies
                discourse ethics,stakeholder relations,political CSR,Habermas,organizational communication

                Comments

                Comment on this article